Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
michael
Participanthttp://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm
NOTE: Marginally attached workers are persons who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not looking currently for a job. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. For more information, see “BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures,” in the October 1995 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data
Participanthttp://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm
NOTE: Marginally attached workers are persons who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not looking currently for a job. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. For more information, see “BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures,” in the October 1995 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data
Participanthttp://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm
NOTE: Marginally attached workers are persons who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not looking currently for a job. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. For more information, see “BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures,” in the October 1995 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data
Participanthttp://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm
NOTE: Marginally attached workers are persons who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the recent past. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not looking currently for a job. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. For more information, see “BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures,” in the October 1995 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data
ParticipantI wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. I wonder if some will pull out the race card and say that it is racist to refer to the president as some kind of primate.
A little more to the subject… while Obama is at it, let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.
Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics!
ParticipantI wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. I wonder if some will pull out the race card and say that it is racist to refer to the president as some kind of primate.
A little more to the subject… while Obama is at it, let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.
Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics!
ParticipantI wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. I wonder if some will pull out the race card and say that it is racist to refer to the president as some kind of primate.
A little more to the subject… while Obama is at it, let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.
Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics!
ParticipantI wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. I wonder if some will pull out the race card and say that it is racist to refer to the president as some kind of primate.
A little more to the subject… while Obama is at it, let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.
Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics!
ParticipantI wonder how Obama supporters will feel when names like “Chimpy” and “Curious George” are used to describe the new president. I wonder if some will pull out the race card and say that it is racist to refer to the president as some kind of primate.
A little more to the subject… while Obama is at it, let him bring back Robert Rubin. You know the guy that sits on the Citigroup board. The guy who’s incompentency ruined Citigroup. Clinton’s former Treasury Secretary.
Clinton’s group simply rode the wave of good work that preceeded them. 12 years of Reaganomics!
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286478Participant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286771Participant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286789Participant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286817Participant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
October 12, 2008 at 6:14 PM in reply to: Thank you Clinton for the Sub-Prime Boom! 1999 NYT Article #286820Participant“I agree about the tech bubble, in the 90’s that was the time when the internet and computers became a commonplace feature in the household because technology made it affordable at that time. I don’t really see the government having to do much with that.”
What?
-
AuthorPosts