Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
meadandale
Participant[quote=CDMA ENG]
As for that guy… He killed innocent ppl… no excuse for that…[/quote]I don’t know…as far as I’m concerned, no one who works for the government is ‘innocent’. And frankly, I think that there are many more people than we want to acknowledge that are one tax audit away from becoming this guy or another McVeigh.
Participant[quote=CDMA ENG]
As for that guy… He killed innocent ppl… no excuse for that…[/quote]I don’t know…as far as I’m concerned, no one who works for the government is ‘innocent’. And frankly, I think that there are many more people than we want to acknowledge that are one tax audit away from becoming this guy or another McVeigh.
Participant[quote=CDMA ENG]
As for that guy… He killed innocent ppl… no excuse for that…[/quote]I don’t know…as far as I’m concerned, no one who works for the government is ‘innocent’. And frankly, I think that there are many more people than we want to acknowledge that are one tax audit away from becoming this guy or another McVeigh.
Participant[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.
Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.
The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]
It’s truly 1984 with this administration…
Participant[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.
Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.
The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]
It’s truly 1984 with this administration…
Participant[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.
Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.
The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]
It’s truly 1984 with this administration…
Participant[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.
Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.
The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]
It’s truly 1984 with this administration…
Participant[quote=CONCHO]It won’t be pretty if unemployment gets above 15% Official.
Certainly not, that is why the official unemployment number will never reach 15%, comrade.
The word from the Politburo is that we are on track with the current 5 year plan, production is up across all sectors.[/quote]
It’s truly 1984 with this administration…
ParticipantHuffingtonPost is about as unbiased as MSLSD. It’s not surprising they aren’t critical of this.
ParticipantHuffingtonPost is about as unbiased as MSLSD. It’s not surprising they aren’t critical of this.
ParticipantHuffingtonPost is about as unbiased as MSLSD. It’s not surprising they aren’t critical of this.
ParticipantHuffingtonPost is about as unbiased as MSLSD. It’s not surprising they aren’t critical of this.
ParticipantHuffingtonPost is about as unbiased as MSLSD. It’s not surprising they aren’t critical of this.
Participant[quote=Eugene][quote]With the unemployment rate over %12 in Klownifornia, exactly where in the private sector are these people highly sought after?[/quote]
The unemployment rate is over 12% for people without college degrees. December ’09 (nationwide) unemployment rate for people with bachelors’ degrees was 4.7%.
Everyone’s ire is understandable, but, with the city economy as bad as it is, last thing we need is incompetent leadership. And that’s what we’ll get if we try to squeeze their salaries. I’m sure that Sanders has enough connections that he can quit his job any day and jump directly into a higher management position of some private company, on a 200k+ salary.[/quote]
He’s welcome to go…and leave his pension behind.
-
AuthorPosts
