Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 28, 2010 at 1:33 PM in reply to: Government spending is more beneficial than private spending #610321September 28, 2010 at 1:33 PM in reply to: Government spending is more beneficial than private spending #610871
meadandale
Participant[quote=briansd1]eavesdropper, that was a great post.[/quote]
Except for the part where he repeatedly referred to me as an ‘ultra-conservative’…which erodes most of the credibility for the rest of the rant.
September 28, 2010 at 1:33 PM in reply to: Government spending is more beneficial than private spending #610981Participant[quote=briansd1]eavesdropper, that was a great post.[/quote]
Except for the part where he repeatedly referred to me as an ‘ultra-conservative’…which erodes most of the credibility for the rest of the rant.
September 28, 2010 at 1:33 PM in reply to: Government spending is more beneficial than private spending #611294Participant[quote=briansd1]eavesdropper, that was a great post.[/quote]
Except for the part where he repeatedly referred to me as an ‘ultra-conservative’…which erodes most of the credibility for the rest of the rant.
September 28, 2010 at 9:26 AM in reply to: Government spending is more beneficial than private spending #610024ParticipantCapitalism is bad. Socialism and Communism are much better.
The party apparatchik’s primary focus is increasing the standard of living and quality of life of the proletariat. Capitalists are greedy and just want to get rich on the back of the working class.
We’ve seen how well this superior style of government has worked several times over the last century. There’s a stunning absence of greed and corruption in socialist/communist countries where everything the government does is for the good of the people.
Workers of the World Unite!
September 28, 2010 at 9:26 AM in reply to: Government spending is more beneficial than private spending #610110ParticipantCapitalism is bad. Socialism and Communism are much better.
The party apparatchik’s primary focus is increasing the standard of living and quality of life of the proletariat. Capitalists are greedy and just want to get rich on the back of the working class.
We’ve seen how well this superior style of government has worked several times over the last century. There’s a stunning absence of greed and corruption in socialist/communist countries where everything the government does is for the good of the people.
Workers of the World Unite!
September 28, 2010 at 9:26 AM in reply to: Government spending is more beneficial than private spending #610659ParticipantCapitalism is bad. Socialism and Communism are much better.
The party apparatchik’s primary focus is increasing the standard of living and quality of life of the proletariat. Capitalists are greedy and just want to get rich on the back of the working class.
We’ve seen how well this superior style of government has worked several times over the last century. There’s a stunning absence of greed and corruption in socialist/communist countries where everything the government does is for the good of the people.
Workers of the World Unite!
September 28, 2010 at 9:26 AM in reply to: Government spending is more beneficial than private spending #610771ParticipantCapitalism is bad. Socialism and Communism are much better.
The party apparatchik’s primary focus is increasing the standard of living and quality of life of the proletariat. Capitalists are greedy and just want to get rich on the back of the working class.
We’ve seen how well this superior style of government has worked several times over the last century. There’s a stunning absence of greed and corruption in socialist/communist countries where everything the government does is for the good of the people.
Workers of the World Unite!
September 28, 2010 at 9:26 AM in reply to: Government spending is more beneficial than private spending #611082ParticipantCapitalism is bad. Socialism and Communism are much better.
The party apparatchik’s primary focus is increasing the standard of living and quality of life of the proletariat. Capitalists are greedy and just want to get rich on the back of the working class.
We’ve seen how well this superior style of government has worked several times over the last century. There’s a stunning absence of greed and corruption in socialist/communist countries where everything the government does is for the good of the people.
Workers of the World Unite!
September 23, 2010 at 6:30 AM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #608393Participant[quote=afx114]They don’t have to sign up if they don’t want do. How is this a mandate?[/quote]
Au Contraire…Obama care will be REQUIRING that every one have health insurance or they will be fined by the IRS. Period.
September 23, 2010 at 6:30 AM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #608479Participant[quote=afx114]They don’t have to sign up if they don’t want do. How is this a mandate?[/quote]
Au Contraire…Obama care will be REQUIRING that every one have health insurance or they will be fined by the IRS. Period.
September 23, 2010 at 6:30 AM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #609033Participant[quote=afx114]They don’t have to sign up if they don’t want do. How is this a mandate?[/quote]
Au Contraire…Obama care will be REQUIRING that every one have health insurance or they will be fined by the IRS. Period.
September 23, 2010 at 6:30 AM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #609142Participant[quote=afx114]They don’t have to sign up if they don’t want do. How is this a mandate?[/quote]
Au Contraire…Obama care will be REQUIRING that every one have health insurance or they will be fined by the IRS. Period.
September 23, 2010 at 6:30 AM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #609463Participant[quote=afx114]They don’t have to sign up if they don’t want do. How is this a mandate?[/quote]
Au Contraire…Obama care will be REQUIRING that every one have health insurance or they will be fined by the IRS. Period.
September 23, 2010 at 6:28 AM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #609137Participant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=enron_by_the_sea] . . . Like it or not – the future of our healthcare is HSA+HDHP and some bargaining with your favorite doctor.
I am in the 5th stage of Anger-Denial-Bargaining-Depression-Acceptance cycle of this issue. Most of the country seems to be in stages 2 and 3.[/quote]
enron, I don’t have an HSA, but have a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) which I used to think was “affordable.”[/quote]
If you have a HDHP it is likely an HSA qualifying plan…in which case you would be foolish not to take advantage of this and contribute pretax dollars to your HSA account that you can then use for any of your health related expenses. The annual max contribution is now almost $3k. If you have a plan with a deductible in the $3-4k range, one year of contributions gives you basically all the money you’d need to pay the deductible in the event you have a major health event (hospitalization, etc).
-
AuthorPosts
