Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
meadandale
ParticipantSo, by your logic, you see nothing wrong with someone going out and maxing out their credit cards right before they go to declare bankruptcy?
ParticipantSo, by your logic, you see nothing wrong with someone going out and maxing out their credit cards right before they go to declare bankruptcy?
ParticipantSo, by your logic, you see nothing wrong with someone going out and maxing out their credit cards right before they go to declare bankruptcy?
Participant“you have to admit though, his points are true and factual…”
Which is surprising considering how poor the spelling and grammar are consistently throughout the listing.
Participant“you have to admit though, his points are true and factual…”
Which is surprising considering how poor the spelling and grammar are consistently throughout the listing.
Participant“you have to admit though, his points are true and factual…”
Which is surprising considering how poor the spelling and grammar are consistently throughout the listing.
Participant“you have to admit though, his points are true and factual…”
Which is surprising considering how poor the spelling and grammar are consistently throughout the listing.
Participant“you have to admit though, his points are true and factual…”
Which is surprising considering how poor the spelling and grammar are consistently throughout the listing.
Participant“Now the FB is left holding the bag and is only taking what legally belongs to them”
I have a few problems with this. First, you state several times that the FB is THE VICTIM. I disagree with this. Then you make the assumption that the FB legally OWNS all the ‘upgrades’ that they are taking back. If they can’t make the mortgage payment, what makes you think that did any of this remodeling with their own cash? It was likely borrowed money that they got via a HELOC, cash back at escrow or a refinance.
Edit: looks like the last sale on this house was in 2001 for $325k (per zillow). I’m now strongly convinced that our FB here did a couple of withdrawals from the house ATM and is now upside down in the house and decided to just walk.
I’m even more convinced now than I was before that these people are a couple of tools.
Participant“Now the FB is left holding the bag and is only taking what legally belongs to them”
I have a few problems with this. First, you state several times that the FB is THE VICTIM. I disagree with this. Then you make the assumption that the FB legally OWNS all the ‘upgrades’ that they are taking back. If they can’t make the mortgage payment, what makes you think that did any of this remodeling with their own cash? It was likely borrowed money that they got via a HELOC, cash back at escrow or a refinance.
Edit: looks like the last sale on this house was in 2001 for $325k (per zillow). I’m now strongly convinced that our FB here did a couple of withdrawals from the house ATM and is now upside down in the house and decided to just walk.
I’m even more convinced now than I was before that these people are a couple of tools.
Participant“Now the FB is left holding the bag and is only taking what legally belongs to them”
I have a few problems with this. First, you state several times that the FB is THE VICTIM. I disagree with this. Then you make the assumption that the FB legally OWNS all the ‘upgrades’ that they are taking back. If they can’t make the mortgage payment, what makes you think that did any of this remodeling with their own cash? It was likely borrowed money that they got via a HELOC, cash back at escrow or a refinance.
Edit: looks like the last sale on this house was in 2001 for $325k (per zillow). I’m now strongly convinced that our FB here did a couple of withdrawals from the house ATM and is now upside down in the house and decided to just walk.
I’m even more convinced now than I was before that these people are a couple of tools.
Participant“Now the FB is left holding the bag and is only taking what legally belongs to them”
I have a few problems with this. First, you state several times that the FB is THE VICTIM. I disagree with this. Then you make the assumption that the FB legally OWNS all the ‘upgrades’ that they are taking back. If they can’t make the mortgage payment, what makes you think that did any of this remodeling with their own cash? It was likely borrowed money that they got via a HELOC, cash back at escrow or a refinance.
Edit: looks like the last sale on this house was in 2001 for $325k (per zillow). I’m now strongly convinced that our FB here did a couple of withdrawals from the house ATM and is now upside down in the house and decided to just walk.
I’m even more convinced now than I was before that these people are a couple of tools.
Participant“Now the FB is left holding the bag and is only taking what legally belongs to them”
I have a few problems with this. First, you state several times that the FB is THE VICTIM. I disagree with this. Then you make the assumption that the FB legally OWNS all the ‘upgrades’ that they are taking back. If they can’t make the mortgage payment, what makes you think that did any of this remodeling with their own cash? It was likely borrowed money that they got via a HELOC, cash back at escrow or a refinance.
Edit: looks like the last sale on this house was in 2001 for $325k (per zillow). I’m now strongly convinced that our FB here did a couple of withdrawals from the house ATM and is now upside down in the house and decided to just walk.
I’m even more convinced now than I was before that these people are a couple of tools.
ParticipantI’ll agree it’s a gray area.
However, consider what people would normally take with them if they were selling the house and the bank wasn’t taking it away. If they are taking stuff that would normally convey with the residence then it seems pretty shady.
-
AuthorPosts
