Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 10, 2009 at 5:25 PM in reply to: Weird..I didn’t apply for a reassessment, but got it anyway. #428548July 10, 2009 at 5:25 PM in reply to: Weird..I didn’t apply for a reassessment, but got it anyway. #428838
meadandale
ParticipantI got a notice of reassessment as well. It was the real deal. The dropped the assessment by about $35k.
July 10, 2009 at 5:25 PM in reply to: Weird..I didn’t apply for a reassessment, but got it anyway. #428908ParticipantI got a notice of reassessment as well. It was the real deal. The dropped the assessment by about $35k.
July 10, 2009 at 5:25 PM in reply to: Weird..I didn’t apply for a reassessment, but got it anyway. #429070ParticipantI got a notice of reassessment as well. It was the real deal. The dropped the assessment by about $35k.
ParticipantThey make a friggin mess everywhere with the little red berries. I used to park my truck under one and the whole bed was filled with cast offs from the tree: leaves and berries.
They are kind of like Jacaranda….pretty to look at but I wouldn’t want one in my yard.
ParticipantThey make a friggin mess everywhere with the little red berries. I used to park my truck under one and the whole bed was filled with cast offs from the tree: leaves and berries.
They are kind of like Jacaranda….pretty to look at but I wouldn’t want one in my yard.
ParticipantThey make a friggin mess everywhere with the little red berries. I used to park my truck under one and the whole bed was filled with cast offs from the tree: leaves and berries.
They are kind of like Jacaranda….pretty to look at but I wouldn’t want one in my yard.
ParticipantThey make a friggin mess everywhere with the little red berries. I used to park my truck under one and the whole bed was filled with cast offs from the tree: leaves and berries.
They are kind of like Jacaranda….pretty to look at but I wouldn’t want one in my yard.
ParticipantThey make a friggin mess everywhere with the little red berries. I used to park my truck under one and the whole bed was filled with cast offs from the tree: leaves and berries.
They are kind of like Jacaranda….pretty to look at but I wouldn’t want one in my yard.
July 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM in reply to: OT: “Bank of America sets cutoff for redeeming California IOUs” #426154Participant[quote=nostradamus]Under the policy, the state won’t redeem such IOUs without a notarized bill of sale signed by the payee whose name appears on the IOU[/quote]
Well that right there is a reason not to pay par value for the IOU’s as the transaction is going to cost the buyer money unless the seller pays the notary fees….
July 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM in reply to: OT: “Bank of America sets cutoff for redeeming California IOUs” #426384Participant[quote=nostradamus]Under the policy, the state won’t redeem such IOUs without a notarized bill of sale signed by the payee whose name appears on the IOU[/quote]
Well that right there is a reason not to pay par value for the IOU’s as the transaction is going to cost the buyer money unless the seller pays the notary fees….
July 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM in reply to: OT: “Bank of America sets cutoff for redeeming California IOUs” #426669Participant[quote=nostradamus]Under the policy, the state won’t redeem such IOUs without a notarized bill of sale signed by the payee whose name appears on the IOU[/quote]
Well that right there is a reason not to pay par value for the IOU’s as the transaction is going to cost the buyer money unless the seller pays the notary fees….
July 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM in reply to: OT: “Bank of America sets cutoff for redeeming California IOUs” #426740Participant[quote=nostradamus]Under the policy, the state won’t redeem such IOUs without a notarized bill of sale signed by the payee whose name appears on the IOU[/quote]
Well that right there is a reason not to pay par value for the IOU’s as the transaction is going to cost the buyer money unless the seller pays the notary fees….
July 7, 2009 at 9:28 AM in reply to: OT: “Bank of America sets cutoff for redeeming California IOUs” #426903Participant[quote=nostradamus]Under the policy, the state won’t redeem such IOUs without a notarized bill of sale signed by the payee whose name appears on the IOU[/quote]
Well that right there is a reason not to pay par value for the IOU’s as the transaction is going to cost the buyer money unless the seller pays the notary fees….
July 7, 2009 at 9:26 AM in reply to: OT: “Bank of America sets cutoff for redeeming California IOUs” #426735Participant[quote=flu]Well looks like you already have some idiots out in full force…
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/wan/1255994019.html
Apparently, some idiots think that 3.75% is worth taking on the risk of an IOU at par value…
Did you get an IOU from CA instead of cash? I am looking to buy some and will pay face value. Please send a photo so I can verify the IOU and so that I know how much your IOU is for.
Thanks!
Um, for 3.75% only, I’ll pass.[/quote]
Considering that my CD’s are currently paying about 1% and my money market accounts are paying about 0.25%, 3.75% is a nice tidy return for an essentially no risk short term investment. I’m not sure how this is ‘stupid’.
-
AuthorPosts
