Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
luchabee
ParticipantYes, there is some language in the law about reasonable wear and tear concerning a tenancy.
(My two cents: just clean it very well and take a lot of photos in case you have to go to small claims.)
Everything you need to know is probably in these pamphlets from the CA Department of Real Estate:
luchabee
ParticipantYes, there is some language in the law about reasonable wear and tear concerning a tenancy.
(My two cents: just clean it very well and take a lot of photos in case you have to go to small claims.)
Everything you need to know is probably in these pamphlets from the CA Department of Real Estate:
luchabee
ParticipantYes, there is some language in the law about reasonable wear and tear concerning a tenancy.
(My two cents: just clean it very well and take a lot of photos in case you have to go to small claims.)
Everything you need to know is probably in these pamphlets from the CA Department of Real Estate:
luchabee
ParticipantYes, there is some language in the law about reasonable wear and tear concerning a tenancy.
(My two cents: just clean it very well and take a lot of photos in case you have to go to small claims.)
Everything you need to know is probably in these pamphlets from the CA Department of Real Estate:
luchabee
ParticipantAs a very proud member of the Christian Right, I’m pretty sure we will not be picking Palin again.
I’d put my money on Huckabee, Romney (long-shot), or some other new business-friendly candidate.
Palin was a terrible pick on so many levels, including her accent and lack of academic and business credentials. Sorry, I doubt the Democrats will have Palin to kick around this time.
I do think it is hilarious about the canard of the Republican Party becoming more conservative. If anything under Bush, we got more liberal, as least with respect to government spending. Moroever, the Democrat Party is hardly the Democrat Party of Kennedy.
luchabee
ParticipantAs a very proud member of the Christian Right, I’m pretty sure we will not be picking Palin again.
I’d put my money on Huckabee, Romney (long-shot), or some other new business-friendly candidate.
Palin was a terrible pick on so many levels, including her accent and lack of academic and business credentials. Sorry, I doubt the Democrats will have Palin to kick around this time.
I do think it is hilarious about the canard of the Republican Party becoming more conservative. If anything under Bush, we got more liberal, as least with respect to government spending. Moroever, the Democrat Party is hardly the Democrat Party of Kennedy.
luchabee
ParticipantAs a very proud member of the Christian Right, I’m pretty sure we will not be picking Palin again.
I’d put my money on Huckabee, Romney (long-shot), or some other new business-friendly candidate.
Palin was a terrible pick on so many levels, including her accent and lack of academic and business credentials. Sorry, I doubt the Democrats will have Palin to kick around this time.
I do think it is hilarious about the canard of the Republican Party becoming more conservative. If anything under Bush, we got more liberal, as least with respect to government spending. Moroever, the Democrat Party is hardly the Democrat Party of Kennedy.
luchabee
ParticipantAs a very proud member of the Christian Right, I’m pretty sure we will not be picking Palin again.
I’d put my money on Huckabee, Romney (long-shot), or some other new business-friendly candidate.
Palin was a terrible pick on so many levels, including her accent and lack of academic and business credentials. Sorry, I doubt the Democrats will have Palin to kick around this time.
I do think it is hilarious about the canard of the Republican Party becoming more conservative. If anything under Bush, we got more liberal, as least with respect to government spending. Moroever, the Democrat Party is hardly the Democrat Party of Kennedy.
luchabee
ParticipantAs a very proud member of the Christian Right, I’m pretty sure we will not be picking Palin again.
I’d put my money on Huckabee, Romney (long-shot), or some other new business-friendly candidate.
Palin was a terrible pick on so many levels, including her accent and lack of academic and business credentials. Sorry, I doubt the Democrats will have Palin to kick around this time.
I do think it is hilarious about the canard of the Republican Party becoming more conservative. If anything under Bush, we got more liberal, as least with respect to government spending. Moroever, the Democrat Party is hardly the Democrat Party of Kennedy.
luchabee
Participant[quote=4plexowner]A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasure. A. Tyler
If I understand correctly, our founding fathers did not create a democracy, they created a republic where the only people who could vote were property owners
I believe democracy is workable IF the vote is limited to stake-holders – once non-stake-holders are allowed to vote, Mr. Tyler’s quote above becomes true
Not sure how to define ‘stake-holder’ in today’s society – much easier to define who is NOT a stake-holder but I don’t want to get the bleeding-heart liberals spun up[/quote]
Yes, I heard a recent stat that 40% of US citizens don’t pay a single cent in taxes, yet they can vote themselves new, costly government programs.
At a state level, I think the prime example was the approval of the high-speed rail system up to S.F., costing us billions. When this was approved, I knew for sure that we were all doomed.
I can’t wait for the next proposisition mandating that all children get their own pony.
luchabee
Participant[quote=4plexowner]A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasure. A. Tyler
If I understand correctly, our founding fathers did not create a democracy, they created a republic where the only people who could vote were property owners
I believe democracy is workable IF the vote is limited to stake-holders – once non-stake-holders are allowed to vote, Mr. Tyler’s quote above becomes true
Not sure how to define ‘stake-holder’ in today’s society – much easier to define who is NOT a stake-holder but I don’t want to get the bleeding-heart liberals spun up[/quote]
Yes, I heard a recent stat that 40% of US citizens don’t pay a single cent in taxes, yet they can vote themselves new, costly government programs.
At a state level, I think the prime example was the approval of the high-speed rail system up to S.F., costing us billions. When this was approved, I knew for sure that we were all doomed.
I can’t wait for the next proposisition mandating that all children get their own pony.
luchabee
Participant[quote=4plexowner]A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasure. A. Tyler
If I understand correctly, our founding fathers did not create a democracy, they created a republic where the only people who could vote were property owners
I believe democracy is workable IF the vote is limited to stake-holders – once non-stake-holders are allowed to vote, Mr. Tyler’s quote above becomes true
Not sure how to define ‘stake-holder’ in today’s society – much easier to define who is NOT a stake-holder but I don’t want to get the bleeding-heart liberals spun up[/quote]
Yes, I heard a recent stat that 40% of US citizens don’t pay a single cent in taxes, yet they can vote themselves new, costly government programs.
At a state level, I think the prime example was the approval of the high-speed rail system up to S.F., costing us billions. When this was approved, I knew for sure that we were all doomed.
I can’t wait for the next proposisition mandating that all children get their own pony.
luchabee
Participant[quote=4plexowner]A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasure. A. Tyler
If I understand correctly, our founding fathers did not create a democracy, they created a republic where the only people who could vote were property owners
I believe democracy is workable IF the vote is limited to stake-holders – once non-stake-holders are allowed to vote, Mr. Tyler’s quote above becomes true
Not sure how to define ‘stake-holder’ in today’s society – much easier to define who is NOT a stake-holder but I don’t want to get the bleeding-heart liberals spun up[/quote]
Yes, I heard a recent stat that 40% of US citizens don’t pay a single cent in taxes, yet they can vote themselves new, costly government programs.
At a state level, I think the prime example was the approval of the high-speed rail system up to S.F., costing us billions. When this was approved, I knew for sure that we were all doomed.
I can’t wait for the next proposisition mandating that all children get their own pony.
luchabee
Participant[quote=4plexowner]A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasure. A. Tyler
If I understand correctly, our founding fathers did not create a democracy, they created a republic where the only people who could vote were property owners
I believe democracy is workable IF the vote is limited to stake-holders – once non-stake-holders are allowed to vote, Mr. Tyler’s quote above becomes true
Not sure how to define ‘stake-holder’ in today’s society – much easier to define who is NOT a stake-holder but I don’t want to get the bleeding-heart liberals spun up[/quote]
Yes, I heard a recent stat that 40% of US citizens don’t pay a single cent in taxes, yet they can vote themselves new, costly government programs.
At a state level, I think the prime example was the approval of the high-speed rail system up to S.F., costing us billions. When this was approved, I knew for sure that we were all doomed.
I can’t wait for the next proposisition mandating that all children get their own pony.
-
AuthorPosts
