Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 7, 2007 at 10:07 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111366December 7, 2007 at 10:07 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111484
lendingbubblecontinues
Participantthe whole point is: don’t buy a house that has mello roos
shame on any buyer who doesn’t force the builder to eat the costs of improvements/infrastructure/new schools, etc.
oh, and if the market is so hot that the builder would laugh at you for suggesting that he pay his own costs for these things….ding, ding, ding: the market is overheated and you should not buy…nothing left to discuss on this one
December 7, 2007 at 10:07 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111518Participantthe whole point is: don’t buy a house that has mello roos
shame on any buyer who doesn’t force the builder to eat the costs of improvements/infrastructure/new schools, etc.
oh, and if the market is so hot that the builder would laugh at you for suggesting that he pay his own costs for these things….ding, ding, ding: the market is overheated and you should not buy…nothing left to discuss on this one
December 7, 2007 at 10:07 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111535Participantthe whole point is: don’t buy a house that has mello roos
shame on any buyer who doesn’t force the builder to eat the costs of improvements/infrastructure/new schools, etc.
oh, and if the market is so hot that the builder would laugh at you for suggesting that he pay his own costs for these things….ding, ding, ding: the market is overheated and you should not buy…nothing left to discuss on this one
December 7, 2007 at 10:07 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111559Participantthe whole point is: don’t buy a house that has mello roos
shame on any buyer who doesn’t force the builder to eat the costs of improvements/infrastructure/new schools, etc.
oh, and if the market is so hot that the builder would laugh at you for suggesting that he pay his own costs for these things….ding, ding, ding: the market is overheated and you should not buy…nothing left to discuss on this one
December 7, 2007 at 9:30 AM in reply to: Just bought a new house, questions on finance and home inspection #111301Participantpk92108–
Way to cheer on the newest member of the GF/FB club! May I assume that the “pk” portion of your handle refers to when you bought your home: the peak??
December 7, 2007 at 9:30 AM in reply to: Just bought a new house, questions on finance and home inspection #111420Participantpk92108–
Way to cheer on the newest member of the GF/FB club! May I assume that the “pk” portion of your handle refers to when you bought your home: the peak??
December 7, 2007 at 9:30 AM in reply to: Just bought a new house, questions on finance and home inspection #111452Participantpk92108–
Way to cheer on the newest member of the GF/FB club! May I assume that the “pk” portion of your handle refers to when you bought your home: the peak??
December 7, 2007 at 9:30 AM in reply to: Just bought a new house, questions on finance and home inspection #111468Participantpk92108–
Way to cheer on the newest member of the GF/FB club! May I assume that the “pk” portion of your handle refers to when you bought your home: the peak??
December 7, 2007 at 9:30 AM in reply to: Just bought a new house, questions on finance and home inspection #111492Participantpk92108–
Way to cheer on the newest member of the GF/FB club! May I assume that the “pk” portion of your handle refers to when you bought your home: the peak??
December 7, 2007 at 7:27 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111226Participanton Mello-Roos:
even with Mello_Roos, Californians are paying maximum of roughly 2% property tax…take a look at some of the other “blue” states property tax rates and you’ll see just how good we’ve got it here.
How about the buyer refusing to pay the Mello_Roos? Seems that is where your argument should be directed.
December 7, 2007 at 7:27 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111343Participanton Mello-Roos:
even with Mello_Roos, Californians are paying maximum of roughly 2% property tax…take a look at some of the other “blue” states property tax rates and you’ll see just how good we’ve got it here.
How about the buyer refusing to pay the Mello_Roos? Seems that is where your argument should be directed.
December 7, 2007 at 7:27 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111377Participanton Mello-Roos:
even with Mello_Roos, Californians are paying maximum of roughly 2% property tax…take a look at some of the other “blue” states property tax rates and you’ll see just how good we’ve got it here.
How about the buyer refusing to pay the Mello_Roos? Seems that is where your argument should be directed.
December 7, 2007 at 7:27 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111393Participanton Mello-Roos:
even with Mello_Roos, Californians are paying maximum of roughly 2% property tax…take a look at some of the other “blue” states property tax rates and you’ll see just how good we’ve got it here.
How about the buyer refusing to pay the Mello_Roos? Seems that is where your argument should be directed.
December 7, 2007 at 7:27 AM in reply to: If California is so worried about Real Estate then why don’t they #111419Participanton Mello-Roos:
even with Mello_Roos, Californians are paying maximum of roughly 2% property tax…take a look at some of the other “blue” states property tax rates and you’ll see just how good we’ve got it here.
How about the buyer refusing to pay the Mello_Roos? Seems that is where your argument should be directed.
-
AuthorPosts
