[larrylujack]

Its because Democrats actually want the illegals here so they can vote and the immigrants know it.

wow, that’s pretty ignorant considering you need to be a US citizen to vote.
you sound like a loser skin head.
lotsa luck, and btw, George Bushs’ army needs persons in Iraq so feel free to join the military and be a hero.

[larrylujack]

the only difference between Hillary and Obama is rhetorical.
let’s face it, vote for either and the war in Iraq drones on and the bleeding of our tax dollars to the tune of over 100,00 dollars per minute continues unabated,
or, vote for McCain if you really really like the Iraq war and wish it to in fact escalate, whom also by the way has absolutely no plan to deal with the recession. whoopeee, screw the liberals, McCain loves war.
What a pathetic choice.
has anybody made the connection between the billions of dollars flushed away in Iraq and the current economic meltdown combined with the inflation numbers increasing? Like I said months ago, it is post Vietnam war all over again.
frankly, Ron Paul or John Edwards would have been better than any of the current crop of corporate schills and warmongers that are the leading candidates of our so-called democracy. face it, more than 2/3 of Americans oppose the Iraq war yet we still are there, is that a functioning, healthy democracy? I think not….we are fooling ourselves

Americans deserve what they get and will get it (bend over and smile) and no candidate really is being honest about the issues, its all about change, but really, what are they specifically proposing changing? Actually, nothing, sadly.
same war, same corporate interests running the show, and the beat goes on….
LL

[larrylujack]

the only difference between Hillary and Obama is rhetorical.
let’s face it, vote for either and the war in Iraq drones on and the bleeding of our tax dollars to the tune of over 100,00 dollars per minute continues unabated,
or, vote for McCain if you really really like the Iraq war and wish it to in fact escalate, whom also by the way has absolutely no plan to deal with the recession. whoopeee, screw the liberals, McCain loves war.
What a pathetic choice.
has anybody made the connection between the billions of dollars flushed away in Iraq and the current economic meltdown combined with the inflation numbers increasing? Like I said months ago, it is post Vietnam war all over again.
frankly, Ron Paul or John Edwards would have been better than any of the current crop of corporate schills and warmongers that are the leading candidates of our so-called democracy. face it, more than 2/3 of Americans oppose the Iraq war yet we still are there, is that a functioning, healthy democracy? I think not….we are fooling ourselves

Americans deserve what they get and will get it (bend over and smile) and no candidate really is being honest about the issues, its all about change, but really, what are they specifically proposing changing? Actually, nothing, sadly.
same war, same corporate interests running the show, and the beat goes on….
LL

[larrylujack]

the only difference between Hillary and Obama is rhetorical.
let’s face it, vote for either and the war in Iraq drones on and the bleeding of our tax dollars to the tune of over 100,00 dollars per minute continues unabated,
or, vote for McCain if you really really like the Iraq war and wish it to in fact escalate, whom also by the way has absolutely no plan to deal with the recession. whoopeee, screw the liberals, McCain loves war.
What a pathetic choice.
has anybody made the connection between the billions of dollars flushed away in Iraq and the current economic meltdown combined with the inflation numbers increasing? Like I said months ago, it is post Vietnam war all over again.
frankly, Ron Paul or John Edwards would have been better than any of the current crop of corporate schills and warmongers that are the leading candidates of our so-called democracy. face it, more than 2/3 of Americans oppose the Iraq war yet we still are there, is that a functioning, healthy democracy? I think not….we are fooling ourselves

Americans deserve what they get and will get it (bend over and smile) and no candidate really is being honest about the issues, its all about change, but really, what are they specifically proposing changing? Actually, nothing, sadly.
same war, same corporate interests running the show, and the beat goes on….
LL

[larrylujack]

the only difference between Hillary and Obama is rhetorical.
let’s face it, vote for either and the war in Iraq drones on and the bleeding of our tax dollars to the tune of over 100,00 dollars per minute continues unabated,
or, vote for McCain if you really really like the Iraq war and wish it to in fact escalate, whom also by the way has absolutely no plan to deal with the recession. whoopeee, screw the liberals, McCain loves war.
What a pathetic choice.
has anybody made the connection between the billions of dollars flushed away in Iraq and the current economic meltdown combined with the inflation numbers increasing? Like I said months ago, it is post Vietnam war all over again.
frankly, Ron Paul or John Edwards would have been better than any of the current crop of corporate schills and warmongers that are the leading candidates of our so-called democracy. face it, more than 2/3 of Americans oppose the Iraq war yet we still are there, is that a functioning, healthy democracy? I think not….we are fooling ourselves

Americans deserve what they get and will get it (bend over and smile) and no candidate really is being honest about the issues, its all about change, but really, what are they specifically proposing changing? Actually, nothing, sadly.
same war, same corporate interests running the show, and the beat goes on….
LL

[larrylujack]

the only difference between Hillary and Obama is rhetorical.
let’s face it, vote for either and the war in Iraq drones on and the bleeding of our tax dollars to the tune of over 100,00 dollars per minute continues unabated,
or, vote for McCain if you really really like the Iraq war and wish it to in fact escalate, whom also by the way has absolutely no plan to deal with the recession. whoopeee, screw the liberals, McCain loves war.
What a pathetic choice.
has anybody made the connection between the billions of dollars flushed away in Iraq and the current economic meltdown combined with the inflation numbers increasing? Like I said months ago, it is post Vietnam war all over again.
frankly, Ron Paul or John Edwards would have been better than any of the current crop of corporate schills and warmongers that are the leading candidates of our so-called democracy. face it, more than 2/3 of Americans oppose the Iraq war yet we still are there, is that a functioning, healthy democracy? I think not….we are fooling ourselves

Americans deserve what they get and will get it (bend over and smile) and no candidate really is being honest about the issues, its all about change, but really, what are they specifically proposing changing? Actually, nothing, sadly.
same war, same corporate interests running the show, and the beat goes on….
LL

[larrylujack]

I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.

 

Agreed, the establishment politicos and its cheerleading corporate media and DC establishment class don't want a grass roots movement for Ron Paul, John Edwards or Mike Huckabee for that matter. These candidates are loose canons that question some of the corporate doctrine that rules this country. That is why the Chris Matthews and pundit class media (who are almost always wrong, BTW) more than anything want to rush the primaries and coronate their favorites, MCcain, Romney or Obama, and less so Hillary even though she is also a corporate mouthpiece. the fact is that a real outsider has a very tough row to go against the millions of dollars being provided by the insurance, wall street and defense bomb the hell out of em, we got a good contract in Iraq, dollars.
sadly, the beat goes on….

[larrylujack]

I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.

 

Agreed, the establishment politicos and its cheerleading corporate media and DC establishment class don't want a grass roots movement for Ron Paul, John Edwards or Mike Huckabee for that matter. These candidates are loose canons that question some of the corporate doctrine that rules this country. That is why the Chris Matthews and pundit class media (who are almost always wrong, BTW) more than anything want to rush the primaries and coronate their favorites, MCcain, Romney or Obama, and less so Hillary even though she is also a corporate mouthpiece. the fact is that a real outsider has a very tough row to go against the millions of dollars being provided by the insurance, wall street and defense bomb the hell out of em, we got a good contract in Iraq, dollars.
sadly, the beat goes on….

[larrylujack]

I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.

 

Agreed, the establishment politicos and its cheerleading corporate media and DC establishment class don't want a grass roots movement for Ron Paul, John Edwards or Mike Huckabee for that matter. These candidates are loose canons that question some of the corporate doctrine that rules this country. That is why the Chris Matthews and pundit class media (who are almost always wrong, BTW) more than anything want to rush the primaries and coronate their favorites, MCcain, Romney or Obama, and less so Hillary even though she is also a corporate mouthpiece. the fact is that a real outsider has a very tough row to go against the millions of dollars being provided by the insurance, wall street and defense bomb the hell out of em, we got a good contract in Iraq, dollars.
sadly, the beat goes on….

[larrylujack]

I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.

 

Agreed, the establishment politicos and its cheerleading corporate media and DC establishment class don't want a grass roots movement for Ron Paul, John Edwards or Mike Huckabee for that matter. These candidates are loose canons that question some of the corporate doctrine that rules this country. That is why the Chris Matthews and pundit class media (who are almost always wrong, BTW) more than anything want to rush the primaries and coronate their favorites, MCcain, Romney or Obama, and less so Hillary even though she is also a corporate mouthpiece. the fact is that a real outsider has a very tough row to go against the millions of dollars being provided by the insurance, wall street and defense bomb the hell out of em, we got a good contract in Iraq, dollars.
sadly, the beat goes on….

[larrylujack]

I am noticing massive institutional resistance to the grassroots-favored candidates on both the right and the left… neither Ron Paul, nor Gravel and Kucinich are getting any respect from the establishment, nor equal opportunity to go to the debates. Edwards is barely getting the time of day.

 

Agreed, the establishment politicos and its cheerleading corporate media and DC establishment class don't want a grass roots movement for Ron Paul, John Edwards or Mike Huckabee for that matter. These candidates are loose canons that question some of the corporate doctrine that rules this country. That is why the Chris Matthews and pundit class media (who are almost always wrong, BTW) more than anything want to rush the primaries and coronate their favorites, MCcain, Romney or Obama, and less so Hillary even though she is also a corporate mouthpiece. the fact is that a real outsider has a very tough row to go against the millions of dollars being provided by the insurance, wall street and defense bomb the hell out of em, we got a good contract in Iraq, dollars.
sadly, the beat goes on….

[larrylujack]

it may not be illegal but it is retarded. a corporation ostensibly needs to be a going concern, not just a way to shield assets from creditors.
besides, you don’t own a business or home anyway so what is the point, are you a deadbeat trying to hide your assets from creditors? If so, in a lawsuit a plaintiff against you could simply pierce the corporate shield anyway so you will derive no benefit.
oh, I would not take any more advice from your so-called friend who suggested the idea as the idea is terribly stupid.

[larrylujack]

it may not be illegal but it is retarded. a corporation ostensibly needs to be a going concern, not just a way to shield assets from creditors.
besides, you don’t own a business or home anyway so what is the point, are you a deadbeat trying to hide your assets from creditors? If so, in a lawsuit a plaintiff against you could simply pierce the corporate shield anyway so you will derive no benefit.
oh, I would not take any more advice from your so-called friend who suggested the idea as the idea is terribly stupid.

[larrylujack]

it may not be illegal but it is retarded. a corporation ostensibly needs to be a going concern, not just a way to shield assets from creditors.
besides, you don’t own a business or home anyway so what is the point, are you a deadbeat trying to hide your assets from creditors? If so, in a lawsuit a plaintiff against you could simply pierce the corporate shield anyway so you will derive no benefit.
oh, I would not take any more advice from your so-called friend who suggested the idea as the idea is terribly stupid.

[larrylujack]

it may not be illegal but it is retarded. a corporation ostensibly needs to be a going concern, not just a way to shield assets from creditors.
besides, you don’t own a business or home anyway so what is the point, are you a deadbeat trying to hide your assets from creditors? If so, in a lawsuit a plaintiff against you could simply pierce the corporate shield anyway so you will derive no benefit.
oh, I would not take any more advice from your so-called friend who suggested the idea as the idea is terribly stupid.

[Author]

Posts