[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]

Apparently you aren’t as hard on the UC management as you are on the private sector management who’s salaries you want to cap:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/01/18/BAI0UH3QH.DTL

http://articles.latimes.com/2006/feb/16/local/me-cap16
[/quote]

Show me a government employee the bankrupted his organization and still got paid 20 million dollars a year and you might have a point.

Are you living under a f*cking rock?

Seriously.

And I’m perfectly happy with *all* executive compensation being capped at 5X the lowest salaried employee.

I am nothing if not consistent.

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]

Apparently you aren’t as hard on the UC management as you are on the private sector management who’s salaries you want to cap:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/01/18/BAI0UH3QH.DTL

http://articles.latimes.com/2006/feb/16/local/me-cap16
[/quote]

Show me a government employee the bankrupted his organization and still got paid 20 million dollars a year and you might have a point.

Are you living under a f*cking rock?

Seriously.

And I’m perfectly happy with *all* executive compensation being capped at 5X the lowest salaried employee.

I am nothing if not consistent.

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]

Apparently you aren’t as hard on the UC management as you are on the private sector management who’s salaries you want to cap:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/01/18/BAI0UH3QH.DTL

http://articles.latimes.com/2006/feb/16/local/me-cap16
[/quote]

Show me a government employee the bankrupted his organization and still got paid 20 million dollars a year and you might have a point.

Are you living under a f*cking rock?

Seriously.

And I’m perfectly happy with *all* executive compensation being capped at 5X the lowest salaried employee.

I am nothing if not consistent.

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]

Apparently you aren’t as hard on the UC management as you are on the private sector management who’s salaries you want to cap:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/01/18/BAI0UH3QH.DTL

http://articles.latimes.com/2006/feb/16/local/me-cap16
[/quote]

Show me a government employee the bankrupted his organization and still got paid 20 million dollars a year and you might have a point.

Are you living under a f*cking rock?

Seriously.

And I’m perfectly happy with *all* executive compensation being capped at 5X the lowest salaried employee.

I am nothing if not consistent.

[kewp]

[quote=meadandale]

Apparently you aren’t as hard on the UC management as you are on the private sector management who’s salaries you want to cap:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/01/18/BAI0UH3QH.DTL

http://articles.latimes.com/2006/feb/16/local/me-cap16
[/quote]

Show me a government employee the bankrupted his organization and still got paid 20 million dollars a year and you might have a point.

Are you living under a f*cking rock?

Seriously.

And I’m perfectly happy with *all* executive compensation being capped at 5X the lowest salaried employee.

I am nothing if not consistent.

[kewp]

[quote=sdduuuude]Well, at least we can agree on that.[/quote]

I think if we sat down over a beer you would discover we agree on most things.

My general philosophy is that the state should only intrude on the free market in two cases.

1. Eliminate (or at least reduce) fraud.

2. Manage externialities.

Other than that, stay out.

If you saw the internals of UC financing you would understand its basically a private school that is subsidized somewhat via the state. Much of our income is from tuition and donations, just like private schools.

[kewp]

[quote=sdduuuude]Well, at least we can agree on that.[/quote]

I think if we sat down over a beer you would discover we agree on most things.

My general philosophy is that the state should only intrude on the free market in two cases.

1. Eliminate (or at least reduce) fraud.

2. Manage externialities.

Other than that, stay out.

If you saw the internals of UC financing you would understand its basically a private school that is subsidized somewhat via the state. Much of our income is from tuition and donations, just like private schools.

[kewp]

[quote=sdduuuude]Well, at least we can agree on that.[/quote]

I think if we sat down over a beer you would discover we agree on most things.

My general philosophy is that the state should only intrude on the free market in two cases.

1. Eliminate (or at least reduce) fraud.

2. Manage externialities.

Other than that, stay out.

If you saw the internals of UC financing you would understand its basically a private school that is subsidized somewhat via the state. Much of our income is from tuition and donations, just like private schools.

[kewp]

[quote=sdduuuude]Well, at least we can agree on that.[/quote]

I think if we sat down over a beer you would discover we agree on most things.

My general philosophy is that the state should only intrude on the free market in two cases.

1. Eliminate (or at least reduce) fraud.

2. Manage externialities.

Other than that, stay out.

If you saw the internals of UC financing you would understand its basically a private school that is subsidized somewhat via the state. Much of our income is from tuition and donations, just like private schools.

[kewp]

[quote=sdduuuude]Well, at least we can agree on that.[/quote]

I think if we sat down over a beer you would discover we agree on most things.

My general philosophy is that the state should only intrude on the free market in two cases.

1. Eliminate (or at least reduce) fraud.

2. Manage externialities.

Other than that, stay out.

If you saw the internals of UC financing you would understand its basically a private school that is subsidized somewhat via the state. Much of our income is from tuition and donations, just like private schools.

[kewp]

[quote=paramount]From Cramer:
3. Enough of the hysteria: there will be no depression.
[/quote]

Oh great, its a sure thing now.

And according to shadowstats, we’ve been in a recession since December 05.

I have to admit, it sure doesn’t feel like one. Things are slowing down a bit in the city, but businesses still seem pretty busy.

Is the worst yet to come?

[kewp]

[quote=paramount]From Cramer:
3. Enough of the hysteria: there will be no depression.
[/quote]

Oh great, its a sure thing now.

And according to shadowstats, we’ve been in a recession since December 05.

I have to admit, it sure doesn’t feel like one. Things are slowing down a bit in the city, but businesses still seem pretty busy.

Is the worst yet to come?

[kewp]

[quote=paramount]From Cramer:
3. Enough of the hysteria: there will be no depression.
[/quote]

Oh great, its a sure thing now.

And according to shadowstats, we’ve been in a recession since December 05.

I have to admit, it sure doesn’t feel like one. Things are slowing down a bit in the city, but businesses still seem pretty busy.

Is the worst yet to come?

[kewp]

[quote=paramount]From Cramer:
3. Enough of the hysteria: there will be no depression.
[/quote]

Oh great, its a sure thing now.

And according to shadowstats, we’ve been in a recession since December 05.

I have to admit, it sure doesn’t feel like one. Things are slowing down a bit in the city, but businesses still seem pretty busy.

Is the worst yet to come?

[kewp]

[quote=paramount]From Cramer:
3. Enough of the hysteria: there will be no depression.
[/quote]

Oh great, its a sure thing now.

And according to shadowstats, we’ve been in a recession since December 05.

I have to admit, it sure doesn’t feel like one. Things are slowing down a bit in the city, but businesses still seem pretty busy.

Is the worst yet to come?

[Author]

Posts