Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
jstoeszParticipant
[quote=pri_dk][quote=jstoesz]Got to love data.[/quote]
I do love data.But your link has none to support your bogus association between the left and the truthers.
The smoke is just getting thicker.[/quote]
I am quoting here from the 2nd wiki link…
“Thirty-five percent (35%) of Democrats believe he did know, 39% say he did not know, and 26% are not sure.” and “Republicans reject that view and, by a 7-to-1 margin, say the President did not know in advance about the attacks.
jstoeszParticipant[quote=Shadowfax][quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
I didn’t see anything there that was uncivil…[/quote]
[quote=Shadowfax]I hope you are not sending your kids to a catholic school, cause then I could say that most of your school’s leaders do believe in homosexuality. But they choose to educate people about in private. (Yes, I have issues with people in leadership taking advantage of kids like that and then LYING about it or covering it up. If you are gay, be gay. Don’t hide behind a psalter then abuse boys in your “spiritual care”.)[/quote]
kids never get raped at public schools…
jstoeszParticipant[quote=Shadowfax][quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
I didn’t see anything there that was uncivil…[/quote]
[quote=Shadowfax]I hope you are not sending your kids to a catholic school, cause then I could say that most of your school’s leaders do believe in homosexuality. But they choose to educate people about in private. (Yes, I have issues with people in leadership taking advantage of kids like that and then LYING about it or covering it up. If you are gay, be gay. Don’t hide behind a psalter then abuse boys in your “spiritual care”.)[/quote]
kids never get raped at public schools…
jstoeszParticipant[quote=Shadowfax][quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
I didn’t see anything there that was uncivil…[/quote]
[quote=Shadowfax]I hope you are not sending your kids to a catholic school, cause then I could say that most of your school’s leaders do believe in homosexuality. But they choose to educate people about in private. (Yes, I have issues with people in leadership taking advantage of kids like that and then LYING about it or covering it up. If you are gay, be gay. Don’t hide behind a psalter then abuse boys in your “spiritual care”.)[/quote]
kids never get raped at public schools…
jstoeszParticipant[quote=Shadowfax][quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
I didn’t see anything there that was uncivil…[/quote]
[quote=Shadowfax]I hope you are not sending your kids to a catholic school, cause then I could say that most of your school’s leaders do believe in homosexuality. But they choose to educate people about in private. (Yes, I have issues with people in leadership taking advantage of kids like that and then LYING about it or covering it up. If you are gay, be gay. Don’t hide behind a psalter then abuse boys in your “spiritual care”.)[/quote]
kids never get raped at public schools…
jstoeszParticipant[quote=Shadowfax][quote=jstoesz]There goes that civil discourse…
Have a nice day.[/quote]
I didn’t see anything there that was uncivil…[/quote]
[quote=Shadowfax]I hope you are not sending your kids to a catholic school, cause then I could say that most of your school’s leaders do believe in homosexuality. But they choose to educate people about in private. (Yes, I have issues with people in leadership taking advantage of kids like that and then LYING about it or covering it up. If you are gay, be gay. Don’t hide behind a psalter then abuse boys in your “spiritual care”.)[/quote]
kids never get raped at public schools…
jstoeszParticipantInstead of responding to the main thesis of my post, why not just go for a floating tertiary sentence? It is so much easier.
I was attempting to reframe the argument. To get to a simpler basis, but you do not want to engage with me. I do not wish to talk about the merits of any of these topics. There will always be disagreements abut curriculum specifically, but why do we even need to have them.
I could go on a long tirade about renters and prop taxes here, but that would not be to the point.
jstoeszParticipantInstead of responding to the main thesis of my post, why not just go for a floating tertiary sentence? It is so much easier.
I was attempting to reframe the argument. To get to a simpler basis, but you do not want to engage with me. I do not wish to talk about the merits of any of these topics. There will always be disagreements abut curriculum specifically, but why do we even need to have them.
I could go on a long tirade about renters and prop taxes here, but that would not be to the point.
jstoeszParticipantInstead of responding to the main thesis of my post, why not just go for a floating tertiary sentence? It is so much easier.
I was attempting to reframe the argument. To get to a simpler basis, but you do not want to engage with me. I do not wish to talk about the merits of any of these topics. There will always be disagreements abut curriculum specifically, but why do we even need to have them.
I could go on a long tirade about renters and prop taxes here, but that would not be to the point.
jstoeszParticipantInstead of responding to the main thesis of my post, why not just go for a floating tertiary sentence? It is so much easier.
I was attempting to reframe the argument. To get to a simpler basis, but you do not want to engage with me. I do not wish to talk about the merits of any of these topics. There will always be disagreements abut curriculum specifically, but why do we even need to have them.
I could go on a long tirade about renters and prop taxes here, but that would not be to the point.
jstoeszParticipantInstead of responding to the main thesis of my post, why not just go for a floating tertiary sentence? It is so much easier.
I was attempting to reframe the argument. To get to a simpler basis, but you do not want to engage with me. I do not wish to talk about the merits of any of these topics. There will always be disagreements abut curriculum specifically, but why do we even need to have them.
I could go on a long tirade about renters and prop taxes here, but that would not be to the point.
jstoeszParticipantduplicate
jstoeszParticipantduplicate
jstoeszParticipantduplicate
-
AuthorPosts