[jmpman]

1) This site kept me from buying in San Diego at the peak of the market.
2) Some guru advised that 2011/2012 would be the bottom of the market (back in 2008). 3) Another brilliant individual suggested that the best way to buy a foreclosure was to find the house you want, then approach the listing agent (when you don’t have a real estate agent) and ask them to represent you. They aren’t allowed, and will decline. You follow up with the question – Do you know someone who can represent me? Of course they do, and it’s likely their best friend.

I made at least $300k from the advice on here, and kept from losing an equal amount. Overall a major win. Thanks!

[jmpman]

By that same logic, if you were a realtor representing an individual, and your brother made a higher offer, don’t you have an obligation to disclose the lower offer to your client? I see no difference between a lending institution and an individual when it comes to the realtor’s ethical obligation.

[jmpman]

By that same logic, if you were a realtor representing an individual, and your brother made a higher offer, don’t you have an obligation to disclose the lower offer to your client? I see no difference between a lending institution and an individual when it comes to the realtor’s ethical obligation.

[jmpman]

By that same logic, if you were a realtor representing an individual, and your brother made a higher offer, don’t you have an obligation to disclose the lower offer to your client? I see no difference between a lending institution and an individual when it comes to the realtor’s ethical obligation.

[jmpman]

By that same logic, if you were a realtor representing an individual, and your brother made a higher offer, don’t you have an obligation to disclose the lower offer to your client? I see no difference between a lending institution and an individual when it comes to the realtor’s ethical obligation.

[jmpman]

By that same logic, if you were a realtor representing an individual, and your brother made a higher offer, don’t you have an obligation to disclose the lower offer to your client? I see no difference between a lending institution and an individual when it comes to the realtor’s ethical obligation.

[jmpman]

Mr Paulson’s going to have an live chat session on Friday:

Friday at 1:00 PM EST
Henry Paulson
Secretary of the Treasury

Ask a question:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/question.html

😉

[jmpman]

Mr Paulson’s going to have an live chat session on Friday:

Friday at 1:00 PM EST
Henry Paulson
Secretary of the Treasury

Ask a question:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/question.html

😉

[jmpman]

Mr Paulson’s going to have an live chat session on Friday:

Friday at 1:00 PM EST
Henry Paulson
Secretary of the Treasury

Ask a question:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/question.html

😉

[jmpman]

Mr Paulson’s going to have an live chat session on Friday:

Friday at 1:00 PM EST
Henry Paulson
Secretary of the Treasury

Ask a question:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/question.html

😉

[jmpman]

Mr Paulson’s going to have an live chat session on Friday:

Friday at 1:00 PM EST
Henry Paulson
Secretary of the Treasury

Ask a question:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/ask/question.html

😉

[jmpman]

The Whitehouse is so concerned for these people with resetting ARMs. This new policy implies that the govt thinks these people should be saved from themselves.

I propose the govt goes one step further, and completely eliminates the ability to finance using ARMs. This will further save the American people from their inability to make sound financial decisions.

Then, maybe I’ll be able to afford a house with a 30 year fixed… bringing true long term stability to the American people.

Seriously though… what would eliminating all but 30 year fixed mortgages do to the housing market?

I’m fine with that type of government intervention.

[jmpman]

The Whitehouse is so concerned for these people with resetting ARMs. This new policy implies that the govt thinks these people should be saved from themselves.

I propose the govt goes one step further, and completely eliminates the ability to finance using ARMs. This will further save the American people from their inability to make sound financial decisions.

Then, maybe I’ll be able to afford a house with a 30 year fixed… bringing true long term stability to the American people.

Seriously though… what would eliminating all but 30 year fixed mortgages do to the housing market?

I’m fine with that type of government intervention.

[jmpman]

The Whitehouse is so concerned for these people with resetting ARMs. This new policy implies that the govt thinks these people should be saved from themselves.

I propose the govt goes one step further, and completely eliminates the ability to finance using ARMs. This will further save the American people from their inability to make sound financial decisions.

Then, maybe I’ll be able to afford a house with a 30 year fixed… bringing true long term stability to the American people.

Seriously though… what would eliminating all but 30 year fixed mortgages do to the housing market?

I’m fine with that type of government intervention.

[jmpman]

The Whitehouse is so concerned for these people with resetting ARMs. This new policy implies that the govt thinks these people should be saved from themselves.

I propose the govt goes one step further, and completely eliminates the ability to finance using ARMs. This will further save the American people from their inability to make sound financial decisions.

Then, maybe I’ll be able to afford a house with a 30 year fixed… bringing true long term stability to the American people.

Seriously though… what would eliminating all but 30 year fixed mortgages do to the housing market?

I’m fine with that type of government intervention.

[Author]

Posts