[jficquette]

[quote=partypup]”Maybe you’re right about housing & economics losing traction, but it’s sort of sad that people like jficquette & partyup have hijacked this site. I have to admit that jficquette is entertaining in an off-color sort of way at times (partyup just flat out rambles), but I do miss the well articulated, fact-based arguments we used to frequently see not that long ago.”

Actually, I have only posted one thread in the entire two years I have been visiting this site. And I have only responded to about five threads, in total. Does this qualify as “highjacking” an entire site?[/quote]

Anytime you tell the truth on a forum dominated by Democrats its called “Hijacking”.

Democrats have a hard time with the truth because it doesn’t fit their world view as dictated to them by Chris Mattrews, Network news, CNN, New York Times etc.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=partypup]”Maybe you’re right about housing & economics losing traction, but it’s sort of sad that people like jficquette & partyup have hijacked this site. I have to admit that jficquette is entertaining in an off-color sort of way at times (partyup just flat out rambles), but I do miss the well articulated, fact-based arguments we used to frequently see not that long ago.”

Actually, I have only posted one thread in the entire two years I have been visiting this site. And I have only responded to about five threads, in total. Does this qualify as “highjacking” an entire site?[/quote]

Anytime you tell the truth on a forum dominated by Democrats its called “Hijacking”.

Democrats have a hard time with the truth because it doesn’t fit their world view as dictated to them by Chris Mattrews, Network news, CNN, New York Times etc.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=partypup]”Maybe you’re right about housing & economics losing traction, but it’s sort of sad that people like jficquette & partyup have hijacked this site. I have to admit that jficquette is entertaining in an off-color sort of way at times (partyup just flat out rambles), but I do miss the well articulated, fact-based arguments we used to frequently see not that long ago.”

Actually, I have only posted one thread in the entire two years I have been visiting this site. And I have only responded to about five threads, in total. Does this qualify as “highjacking” an entire site?[/quote]

Anytime you tell the truth on a forum dominated by Democrats its called “Hijacking”.

Democrats have a hard time with the truth because it doesn’t fit their world view as dictated to them by Chris Mattrews, Network news, CNN, New York Times etc.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=partypup]”Maybe you’re right about housing & economics losing traction, but it’s sort of sad that people like jficquette & partyup have hijacked this site. I have to admit that jficquette is entertaining in an off-color sort of way at times (partyup just flat out rambles), but I do miss the well articulated, fact-based arguments we used to frequently see not that long ago.”

Actually, I have only posted one thread in the entire two years I have been visiting this site. And I have only responded to about five threads, in total. Does this qualify as “highjacking” an entire site?[/quote]

Anytime you tell the truth on a forum dominated by Democrats its called “Hijacking”.

Democrats have a hard time with the truth because it doesn’t fit their world view as dictated to them by Chris Mattrews, Network news, CNN, New York Times etc.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=partypup]”Maybe you’re right about housing & economics losing traction, but it’s sort of sad that people like jficquette & partyup have hijacked this site. I have to admit that jficquette is entertaining in an off-color sort of way at times (partyup just flat out rambles), but I do miss the well articulated, fact-based arguments we used to frequently see not that long ago.”

Actually, I have only posted one thread in the entire two years I have been visiting this site. And I have only responded to about five threads, in total. Does this qualify as “highjacking” an entire site?[/quote]

Anytime you tell the truth on a forum dominated by Democrats its called “Hijacking”.

Democrats have a hard time with the truth because it doesn’t fit their world view as dictated to them by Chris Mattrews, Network news, CNN, New York Times etc.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=equalizer]John,

Those national polls on who is doing a good job are worthless. Those same 90% are the ones that say the rep for their district is doing a good job. Its the same national polls on the pres elec, its the electoral college not popular vote, otherwise we’d all be driving smart cars under Gore. The press is too stupid or more likely is too broke to conduct 50 state polls to get real data.

intrade (UK futures site banned in this country by the nanny pukes in DC) has McCain at only 31% chance of winning, while the University of Iowa elections market (open to US with limit of $500) has McCain at 35%.
You can clean up at the IOWA site, the odds are SO WRONG; once we get in there the odd in Oct will go 50-50. Sure thing John, easy 500.

http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/quotes/Pres08_Quotes.html

For those outside USA:
http://www.intrade.com/#

[/quote]

I just trying to make the point that people talk about how poorly Bush does in the poll while ignoring that 4 times more people think Bush is doing is a good job vs those that think Congress is doing a good job.

I have a friend who traded political futures based in London. I am not sure if they are more then one future to trade or not or if he traded the one that you have linked. At one time the futures he traded had Hillary with a lock on the nomination with Obama round 2%.

I agree with the odds being off. Buying McCain at 31% would be a gift.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=equalizer]John,

Those national polls on who is doing a good job are worthless. Those same 90% are the ones that say the rep for their district is doing a good job. Its the same national polls on the pres elec, its the electoral college not popular vote, otherwise we’d all be driving smart cars under Gore. The press is too stupid or more likely is too broke to conduct 50 state polls to get real data.

intrade (UK futures site banned in this country by the nanny pukes in DC) has McCain at only 31% chance of winning, while the University of Iowa elections market (open to US with limit of $500) has McCain at 35%.
You can clean up at the IOWA site, the odds are SO WRONG; once we get in there the odd in Oct will go 50-50. Sure thing John, easy 500.

http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/quotes/Pres08_Quotes.html

For those outside USA:
http://www.intrade.com/#

[/quote]

I just trying to make the point that people talk about how poorly Bush does in the poll while ignoring that 4 times more people think Bush is doing is a good job vs those that think Congress is doing a good job.

I have a friend who traded political futures based in London. I am not sure if they are more then one future to trade or not or if he traded the one that you have linked. At one time the futures he traded had Hillary with a lock on the nomination with Obama round 2%.

I agree with the odds being off. Buying McCain at 31% would be a gift.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=equalizer]John,

Those national polls on who is doing a good job are worthless. Those same 90% are the ones that say the rep for their district is doing a good job. Its the same national polls on the pres elec, its the electoral college not popular vote, otherwise we’d all be driving smart cars under Gore. The press is too stupid or more likely is too broke to conduct 50 state polls to get real data.

intrade (UK futures site banned in this country by the nanny pukes in DC) has McCain at only 31% chance of winning, while the University of Iowa elections market (open to US with limit of $500) has McCain at 35%.
You can clean up at the IOWA site, the odds are SO WRONG; once we get in there the odd in Oct will go 50-50. Sure thing John, easy 500.

http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/quotes/Pres08_Quotes.html

For those outside USA:
http://www.intrade.com/#

[/quote]

I just trying to make the point that people talk about how poorly Bush does in the poll while ignoring that 4 times more people think Bush is doing is a good job vs those that think Congress is doing a good job.

I have a friend who traded political futures based in London. I am not sure if they are more then one future to trade or not or if he traded the one that you have linked. At one time the futures he traded had Hillary with a lock on the nomination with Obama round 2%.

I agree with the odds being off. Buying McCain at 31% would be a gift.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=equalizer]John,

Those national polls on who is doing a good job are worthless. Those same 90% are the ones that say the rep for their district is doing a good job. Its the same national polls on the pres elec, its the electoral college not popular vote, otherwise we’d all be driving smart cars under Gore. The press is too stupid or more likely is too broke to conduct 50 state polls to get real data.

intrade (UK futures site banned in this country by the nanny pukes in DC) has McCain at only 31% chance of winning, while the University of Iowa elections market (open to US with limit of $500) has McCain at 35%.
You can clean up at the IOWA site, the odds are SO WRONG; once we get in there the odd in Oct will go 50-50. Sure thing John, easy 500.

http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/quotes/Pres08_Quotes.html

For those outside USA:
http://www.intrade.com/#

[/quote]

I just trying to make the point that people talk about how poorly Bush does in the poll while ignoring that 4 times more people think Bush is doing is a good job vs those that think Congress is doing a good job.

I have a friend who traded political futures based in London. I am not sure if they are more then one future to trade or not or if he traded the one that you have linked. At one time the futures he traded had Hillary with a lock on the nomination with Obama round 2%.

I agree with the odds being off. Buying McCain at 31% would be a gift.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=equalizer]John,

Those national polls on who is doing a good job are worthless. Those same 90% are the ones that say the rep for their district is doing a good job. Its the same national polls on the pres elec, its the electoral college not popular vote, otherwise we’d all be driving smart cars under Gore. The press is too stupid or more likely is too broke to conduct 50 state polls to get real data.

intrade (UK futures site banned in this country by the nanny pukes in DC) has McCain at only 31% chance of winning, while the University of Iowa elections market (open to US with limit of $500) has McCain at 35%.
You can clean up at the IOWA site, the odds are SO WRONG; once we get in there the odd in Oct will go 50-50. Sure thing John, easy 500.

http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/quotes/Pres08_Quotes.html

For those outside USA:
http://www.intrade.com/#

[/quote]

I just trying to make the point that people talk about how poorly Bush does in the poll while ignoring that 4 times more people think Bush is doing is a good job vs those that think Congress is doing a good job.

I have a friend who traded political futures based in London. I am not sure if they are more then one future to trade or not or if he traded the one that you have linked. At one time the futures he traded had Hillary with a lock on the nomination with Obama round 2%.

I agree with the odds being off. Buying McCain at 31% would be a gift.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]I’m not talking about this specific issue. Which I have my own issues on how it is presented to the public. It’s all of your post’s. You stance on oil, GW and Obama is right out of right wing talk radio playbook.

Show some individuality.

This planet is an ecological disaster on many levels and would take many many books for you to understand the breadth of problems. GW is not the scariest monster at our villages door. At least not in the respect that we can do anything about it.

The decline of world oil production will take care of even the most aggressive climate scientists wishes on carbon reduction. We should start terminal decline somewhere between late 09 to mid 2011. However, it renders our fractional reserve, grow or die, fiat based economic model useless.

[/quote]

Peak oil is another myth. The world will have quit using fossil fuels for primary electrical generation way before we quit looking for new reserves.

Democrats use peak oil as an excuse to prevent exploration of new reserves in America. They rather pretend there is no oil to find.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]I’m not talking about this specific issue. Which I have my own issues on how it is presented to the public. It’s all of your post’s. You stance on oil, GW and Obama is right out of right wing talk radio playbook.

Show some individuality.

This planet is an ecological disaster on many levels and would take many many books for you to understand the breadth of problems. GW is not the scariest monster at our villages door. At least not in the respect that we can do anything about it.

The decline of world oil production will take care of even the most aggressive climate scientists wishes on carbon reduction. We should start terminal decline somewhere between late 09 to mid 2011. However, it renders our fractional reserve, grow or die, fiat based economic model useless.

[/quote]

Peak oil is another myth. The world will have quit using fossil fuels for primary electrical generation way before we quit looking for new reserves.

Democrats use peak oil as an excuse to prevent exploration of new reserves in America. They rather pretend there is no oil to find.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]I’m not talking about this specific issue. Which I have my own issues on how it is presented to the public. It’s all of your post’s. You stance on oil, GW and Obama is right out of right wing talk radio playbook.

Show some individuality.

This planet is an ecological disaster on many levels and would take many many books for you to understand the breadth of problems. GW is not the scariest monster at our villages door. At least not in the respect that we can do anything about it.

The decline of world oil production will take care of even the most aggressive climate scientists wishes on carbon reduction. We should start terminal decline somewhere between late 09 to mid 2011. However, it renders our fractional reserve, grow or die, fiat based economic model useless.

[/quote]

Peak oil is another myth. The world will have quit using fossil fuels for primary electrical generation way before we quit looking for new reserves.

Democrats use peak oil as an excuse to prevent exploration of new reserves in America. They rather pretend there is no oil to find.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]I’m not talking about this specific issue. Which I have my own issues on how it is presented to the public. It’s all of your post’s. You stance on oil, GW and Obama is right out of right wing talk radio playbook.

Show some individuality.

This planet is an ecological disaster on many levels and would take many many books for you to understand the breadth of problems. GW is not the scariest monster at our villages door. At least not in the respect that we can do anything about it.

The decline of world oil production will take care of even the most aggressive climate scientists wishes on carbon reduction. We should start terminal decline somewhere between late 09 to mid 2011. However, it renders our fractional reserve, grow or die, fiat based economic model useless.

[/quote]

Peak oil is another myth. The world will have quit using fossil fuels for primary electrical generation way before we quit looking for new reserves.

Democrats use peak oil as an excuse to prevent exploration of new reserves in America. They rather pretend there is no oil to find.

John

[jficquette]

[quote=arraya]I’m not talking about this specific issue. Which I have my own issues on how it is presented to the public. It’s all of your post’s. You stance on oil, GW and Obama is right out of right wing talk radio playbook.

Show some individuality.

This planet is an ecological disaster on many levels and would take many many books for you to understand the breadth of problems. GW is not the scariest monster at our villages door. At least not in the respect that we can do anything about it.

The decline of world oil production will take care of even the most aggressive climate scientists wishes on carbon reduction. We should start terminal decline somewhere between late 09 to mid 2011. However, it renders our fractional reserve, grow or die, fiat based economic model useless.

[/quote]

Peak oil is another myth. The world will have quit using fossil fuels for primary electrical generation way before we quit looking for new reserves.

Democrats use peak oil as an excuse to prevent exploration of new reserves in America. They rather pretend there is no oil to find.

John

[Author]

Posts