[jeeman]

Yes, i agree with SDRealtor. It was a “sugar-high”, and the positive GDP is mostly just growth in the government.

That is not growth, since government can only grow by taxing a growing private sector or by borrowing from foreigners (i.e. the Chinese). We have to pay all of this back one day. Obama has increased our debt in 2 years more than Bush did in all 8 of his years!

[jeeman]

Yes, i agree with SDRealtor. It was a “sugar-high”, and the positive GDP is mostly just growth in the government.

That is not growth, since government can only grow by taxing a growing private sector or by borrowing from foreigners (i.e. the Chinese). We have to pay all of this back one day. Obama has increased our debt in 2 years more than Bush did in all 8 of his years!

[jeeman]

Yes, i agree with SDRealtor. It was a “sugar-high”, and the positive GDP is mostly just growth in the government.

That is not growth, since government can only grow by taxing a growing private sector or by borrowing from foreigners (i.e. the Chinese). We have to pay all of this back one day. Obama has increased our debt in 2 years more than Bush did in all 8 of his years!

[jeeman]

I remember that 20 years ago, there was an environmental movement to demonize those people who use paper, because it’s destroying our forests. They pushed plastic. Now these same are demonizing those who use plastic, and are pushing paper.

Now I just ask for one of each, so I can destroy this earth in both ways equally.

[jeeman]

I remember that 20 years ago, there was an environmental movement to demonize those people who use paper, because it’s destroying our forests. They pushed plastic. Now these same are demonizing those who use plastic, and are pushing paper.

Now I just ask for one of each, so I can destroy this earth in both ways equally.

[jeeman]

I remember that 20 years ago, there was an environmental movement to demonize those people who use paper, because it’s destroying our forests. They pushed plastic. Now these same are demonizing those who use plastic, and are pushing paper.

Now I just ask for one of each, so I can destroy this earth in both ways equally.

[jeeman]

I remember that 20 years ago, there was an environmental movement to demonize those people who use paper, because it’s destroying our forests. They pushed plastic. Now these same are demonizing those who use plastic, and are pushing paper.

Now I just ask for one of each, so I can destroy this earth in both ways equally.

[jeeman]

I remember that 20 years ago, there was an environmental movement to demonize those people who use paper, because it’s destroying our forests. They pushed plastic. Now these same are demonizing those who use plastic, and are pushing paper.

Now I just ask for one of each, so I can destroy this earth in both ways equally.

[jeeman]

Money supply + credit = inflation.

Credit has been dialed back big time in the last couple of years, and demand has dropped due to that (for homes, cars, TVs, etc).

Look at 1996-2008: the money supply was fairly constant, hovering about $800B, but credit was getting looser and looser, increasing money velocity, and we had inflation.

So money supply alone would not cause inflation.

[jeeman]

Money supply + credit = inflation.

Credit has been dialed back big time in the last couple of years, and demand has dropped due to that (for homes, cars, TVs, etc).

Look at 1996-2008: the money supply was fairly constant, hovering about $800B, but credit was getting looser and looser, increasing money velocity, and we had inflation.

So money supply alone would not cause inflation.

[jeeman]

Money supply + credit = inflation.

Credit has been dialed back big time in the last couple of years, and demand has dropped due to that (for homes, cars, TVs, etc).

Look at 1996-2008: the money supply was fairly constant, hovering about $800B, but credit was getting looser and looser, increasing money velocity, and we had inflation.

So money supply alone would not cause inflation.

[jeeman]

Money supply + credit = inflation.

Credit has been dialed back big time in the last couple of years, and demand has dropped due to that (for homes, cars, TVs, etc).

Look at 1996-2008: the money supply was fairly constant, hovering about $800B, but credit was getting looser and looser, increasing money velocity, and we had inflation.

So money supply alone would not cause inflation.

[jeeman]

Money supply + credit = inflation.

Credit has been dialed back big time in the last couple of years, and demand has dropped due to that (for homes, cars, TVs, etc).

Look at 1996-2008: the money supply was fairly constant, hovering about $800B, but credit was getting looser and looser, increasing money velocity, and we had inflation.

So money supply alone would not cause inflation.

[jeeman]

jpinpb, lol, it isn’t as sweet, probably because the sweet doesn’t linger on the tongue. But it is almost all guilt free. 1/2 cup is 18g carbs, and I max out at 1/2 cup. Oh well, maybe one day he will see how important his health is.

[jeeman]

jpinpb, lol, it isn’t as sweet, probably because the sweet doesn’t linger on the tongue. But it is almost all guilt free. 1/2 cup is 18g carbs, and I max out at 1/2 cup. Oh well, maybe one day he will see how important his health is.

[Author]

Posts