[investor]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]

hahaha, that’s a really good one.

That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.

That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.

[investor]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]

hahaha, that’s a really good one.

That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.

That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.

[investor]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]

hahaha, that’s a really good one.

That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.

That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.

[investor]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]

hahaha, that’s a really good one.

That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.

That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.

[investor]

[quote=briansd1][quote=pjwal]Leftists can never argue policy during a general election, so they always spit out crap like this.[/quote]

hahaha, that’s a really good one.

That’s why conservatives wave the flag and the cross rather than focus on policy.

That’s they they malign immigrants by passing unconstitutional laws such as Prop 187 and SB1070 to energize their base.[/quote]
No conservatives I know are maligning immigrants, they just want our laws followed. It is the left side (and unfortunatly some on the right) who want to ignore immigration laws just for political gains with hispanic voters. That is corruption. I personally am not against 10 million hispanic immigrants, but you have to screen them for criminal activity and for health reasons, just like all immigrants are/should be. And, you have to address the other non-hispanic immigrants that have been waiting so long to immigrate to the US.

[investor]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.

[investor]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.

[investor]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.

[investor]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.

[investor]

[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood]Brian,

Thanks for the information. It’s obvious that Whitman would have this person deported if she could. If Whitman is treating a loyal servant who worked for her for 9 years like garbage, imagine how she will treat the common California voter.

Hopefully California voters will have the good sense not to vote into office someone who would only represent the top 0.0001% of income earners while treating the rest of us like her own personal trash can.[/quote]
BGIG: The reason why this is coming out is to influence the election against whitman. You are falling for propaganda BGIG. Unless of course, you don’t want whitman and all you care about is stopping whitman, not putting reports into perspective.

[investor]

I don’t see a revolution either but I do see a situation so bad that there is a wide spread call to change the system to a more equitable one. (Flat tax, term limits on congress people, balanced budget mandatory, replacing the dollar with another currency, …)The book “aftershock” by weinamer (or something close to that) spells it all out. I am a little surprised that greenspan is saying something similar to what aftershock says. ( If you read between greenspan’s words). This is the first time I have heard a mainstream economist reference a catastrophe if the debt load isn’t reduced. In short, aftershock says that we are in for a dollar bubble which leads to a Treasury bond bubble/default.

[investor]

I don’t see a revolution either but I do see a situation so bad that there is a wide spread call to change the system to a more equitable one. (Flat tax, term limits on congress people, balanced budget mandatory, replacing the dollar with another currency, …)The book “aftershock” by weinamer (or something close to that) spells it all out. I am a little surprised that greenspan is saying something similar to what aftershock says. ( If you read between greenspan’s words). This is the first time I have heard a mainstream economist reference a catastrophe if the debt load isn’t reduced. In short, aftershock says that we are in for a dollar bubble which leads to a Treasury bond bubble/default.

[investor]

I don’t see a revolution either but I do see a situation so bad that there is a wide spread call to change the system to a more equitable one. (Flat tax, term limits on congress people, balanced budget mandatory, replacing the dollar with another currency, …)The book “aftershock” by weinamer (or something close to that) spells it all out. I am a little surprised that greenspan is saying something similar to what aftershock says. ( If you read between greenspan’s words). This is the first time I have heard a mainstream economist reference a catastrophe if the debt load isn’t reduced. In short, aftershock says that we are in for a dollar bubble which leads to a Treasury bond bubble/default.

[investor]

I don’t see a revolution either but I do see a situation so bad that there is a wide spread call to change the system to a more equitable one. (Flat tax, term limits on congress people, balanced budget mandatory, replacing the dollar with another currency, …)The book “aftershock” by weinamer (or something close to that) spells it all out. I am a little surprised that greenspan is saying something similar to what aftershock says. ( If you read between greenspan’s words). This is the first time I have heard a mainstream economist reference a catastrophe if the debt load isn’t reduced. In short, aftershock says that we are in for a dollar bubble which leads to a Treasury bond bubble/default.

[investor]

I don’t see a revolution either but I do see a situation so bad that there is a wide spread call to change the system to a more equitable one. (Flat tax, term limits on congress people, balanced budget mandatory, replacing the dollar with another currency, …)The book “aftershock” by weinamer (or something close to that) spells it all out. I am a little surprised that greenspan is saying something similar to what aftershock says. ( If you read between greenspan’s words). This is the first time I have heard a mainstream economist reference a catastrophe if the debt load isn’t reduced. In short, aftershock says that we are in for a dollar bubble which leads to a Treasury bond bubble/default.

[Author]

Posts