[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative.
[/quote]
I find that anyone who uses the 1st grade technique of rewording/restructuring a ‘name/callsign’ in a vain attempt to discredit someone through insinuation is boorish and immature at best. It also demonstrates someone who has a lack of intellect for skillful verbal jousting. A person using their non-financial degrees to make $550k/year in the real-estate business would have the ability for some nice snappy comebacks.

Using “UC of degenerate”.. that is weak, comes from an elementary school yard, and belongs on an elementary school yard.

I will readily admit that I am not up to “Allan from Fallbrook’s” skill though.[/quote]
So, you guys can throw all the bombs you want and I can’t? Is that it?

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative.
[/quote]
I find that anyone who uses the 1st grade technique of rewording/restructuring a ‘name/callsign’ in a vain attempt to discredit someone through insinuation is boorish and immature at best. It also demonstrates someone who has a lack of intellect for skillful verbal jousting. A person using their non-financial degrees to make $550k/year in the real-estate business would have the ability for some nice snappy comebacks.

Using “UC of degenerate”.. that is weak, comes from an elementary school yard, and belongs on an elementary school yard.

I will readily admit that I am not up to “Allan from Fallbrook’s” skill though.[/quote]
So, you guys can throw all the bombs you want and I can’t? Is that it?

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative.
[/quote]
I find that anyone who uses the 1st grade technique of rewording/restructuring a ‘name/callsign’ in a vain attempt to discredit someone through insinuation is boorish and immature at best. It also demonstrates someone who has a lack of intellect for skillful verbal jousting. A person using their non-financial degrees to make $550k/year in the real-estate business would have the ability for some nice snappy comebacks.

Using “UC of degenerate”.. that is weak, comes from an elementary school yard, and belongs on an elementary school yard.

I will readily admit that I am not up to “Allan from Fallbrook’s” skill though.[/quote]
So, you guys can throw all the bombs you want and I can’t? Is that it?

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative.
[/quote]
I find that anyone who uses the 1st grade technique of rewording/restructuring a ‘name/callsign’ in a vain attempt to discredit someone through insinuation is boorish and immature at best. It also demonstrates someone who has a lack of intellect for skillful verbal jousting. A person using their non-financial degrees to make $550k/year in the real-estate business would have the ability for some nice snappy comebacks.

Using “UC of degenerate”.. that is weak, comes from an elementary school yard, and belongs on an elementary school yard.

I will readily admit that I am not up to “Allan from Fallbrook’s” skill though.[/quote]
So, you guys can throw all the bombs you want and I can’t? Is that it?

[investor]

[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
UC of degenerate: If this is what you call “not sliming” then I would hate to see what you call negative.
[/quote]
I find that anyone who uses the 1st grade technique of rewording/restructuring a ‘name/callsign’ in a vain attempt to discredit someone through insinuation is boorish and immature at best. It also demonstrates someone who has a lack of intellect for skillful verbal jousting. A person using their non-financial degrees to make $550k/year in the real-estate business would have the ability for some nice snappy comebacks.

Using “UC of degenerate”.. that is weak, comes from an elementary school yard, and belongs on an elementary school yard.

I will readily admit that I am not up to “Allan from Fallbrook’s” skill though.[/quote]
So, you guys can throw all the bombs you want and I can’t? Is that it?

[investor]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=investor][quote=FormerSanDiegan]I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.[/quote]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses? Same stupid method as Allen from Fallbrook and davelj.Why don’t you get back to the topic?[/quote]

I don’t know what you are talking about. I was not pointing out any typos, simply just typing what came to mind after reading through (well, skimming through) this thread. I made a post about … well… about posting nothing, but you still seemed to find fault with it and put me into a category of people who according to you use “stupid methods.” As far as I can tell the topic here is how people respond to other people on this blog, their qualifications and degrees and their personal beliefs on how one should or should not respond to post with or without cogent thought. In that vein I am simply trying to post thoughts in those same areas and trying to fit in with this thread since it is the hottest thread on the board the last couple of days.

Anyway, I think the motivation for creating a conspiracy that is ultamately hatched long after you are dead (like the Federal Reserve in 1913) is so that you can create mystery and aura about yourself and give nutty authors stuff to write about.

In that vein, so far I have no offers from anyone to join my club in which club members will conspire to rule the universe. The plan will take some time and the expected fruition will be in 2108 or 2109.
We lay the ground work now to destroy the economy of the entire universe (not just Earth, we have to think big here because it’s in the future), while enriching our members. The plan will take some time to hatch, but in the end our members will rule the financial universe. If all goes well the plan will run its course by 2107 or 2109 at the latest.
Who’s with me ?[/quote]
And I’m sure that your sarcasm isn’t intended either. It does contribute to the original topic of this thread doesn’t it? THIS IS A BLOG, NOT A PUBLISHED PAPER.I’m not the one who said that the central banking is a conspiracy. Just wanted to get others opinion on what griffin said. But, a lot of you folks like to throw bombs instead of debating what griffin said. I applaud allen for being willing to take the subject at hand to heart and be willing to further study it. He is the only one on this entire thread that seems to be willing to do that. By the way, your nick name is “creep who left”. congrats!

[investor]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=investor][quote=FormerSanDiegan]I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.[/quote]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses? Same stupid method as Allen from Fallbrook and davelj.Why don’t you get back to the topic?[/quote]

I don’t know what you are talking about. I was not pointing out any typos, simply just typing what came to mind after reading through (well, skimming through) this thread. I made a post about … well… about posting nothing, but you still seemed to find fault with it and put me into a category of people who according to you use “stupid methods.” As far as I can tell the topic here is how people respond to other people on this blog, their qualifications and degrees and their personal beliefs on how one should or should not respond to post with or without cogent thought. In that vein I am simply trying to post thoughts in those same areas and trying to fit in with this thread since it is the hottest thread on the board the last couple of days.

Anyway, I think the motivation for creating a conspiracy that is ultamately hatched long after you are dead (like the Federal Reserve in 1913) is so that you can create mystery and aura about yourself and give nutty authors stuff to write about.

In that vein, so far I have no offers from anyone to join my club in which club members will conspire to rule the universe. The plan will take some time and the expected fruition will be in 2108 or 2109.
We lay the ground work now to destroy the economy of the entire universe (not just Earth, we have to think big here because it’s in the future), while enriching our members. The plan will take some time to hatch, but in the end our members will rule the financial universe. If all goes well the plan will run its course by 2107 or 2109 at the latest.
Who’s with me ?[/quote]
And I’m sure that your sarcasm isn’t intended either. It does contribute to the original topic of this thread doesn’t it? THIS IS A BLOG, NOT A PUBLISHED PAPER.I’m not the one who said that the central banking is a conspiracy. Just wanted to get others opinion on what griffin said. But, a lot of you folks like to throw bombs instead of debating what griffin said. I applaud allen for being willing to take the subject at hand to heart and be willing to further study it. He is the only one on this entire thread that seems to be willing to do that. By the way, your nick name is “creep who left”. congrats!

[investor]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=investor][quote=FormerSanDiegan]I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.[/quote]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses? Same stupid method as Allen from Fallbrook and davelj.Why don’t you get back to the topic?[/quote]

I don’t know what you are talking about. I was not pointing out any typos, simply just typing what came to mind after reading through (well, skimming through) this thread. I made a post about … well… about posting nothing, but you still seemed to find fault with it and put me into a category of people who according to you use “stupid methods.” As far as I can tell the topic here is how people respond to other people on this blog, their qualifications and degrees and their personal beliefs on how one should or should not respond to post with or without cogent thought. In that vein I am simply trying to post thoughts in those same areas and trying to fit in with this thread since it is the hottest thread on the board the last couple of days.

Anyway, I think the motivation for creating a conspiracy that is ultamately hatched long after you are dead (like the Federal Reserve in 1913) is so that you can create mystery and aura about yourself and give nutty authors stuff to write about.

In that vein, so far I have no offers from anyone to join my club in which club members will conspire to rule the universe. The plan will take some time and the expected fruition will be in 2108 or 2109.
We lay the ground work now to destroy the economy of the entire universe (not just Earth, we have to think big here because it’s in the future), while enriching our members. The plan will take some time to hatch, but in the end our members will rule the financial universe. If all goes well the plan will run its course by 2107 or 2109 at the latest.
Who’s with me ?[/quote]
And I’m sure that your sarcasm isn’t intended either. It does contribute to the original topic of this thread doesn’t it? THIS IS A BLOG, NOT A PUBLISHED PAPER.I’m not the one who said that the central banking is a conspiracy. Just wanted to get others opinion on what griffin said. But, a lot of you folks like to throw bombs instead of debating what griffin said. I applaud allen for being willing to take the subject at hand to heart and be willing to further study it. He is the only one on this entire thread that seems to be willing to do that. By the way, your nick name is “creep who left”. congrats!

[investor]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=investor][quote=FormerSanDiegan]I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.[/quote]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses? Same stupid method as Allen from Fallbrook and davelj.Why don’t you get back to the topic?[/quote]

I don’t know what you are talking about. I was not pointing out any typos, simply just typing what came to mind after reading through (well, skimming through) this thread. I made a post about … well… about posting nothing, but you still seemed to find fault with it and put me into a category of people who according to you use “stupid methods.” As far as I can tell the topic here is how people respond to other people on this blog, their qualifications and degrees and their personal beliefs on how one should or should not respond to post with or without cogent thought. In that vein I am simply trying to post thoughts in those same areas and trying to fit in with this thread since it is the hottest thread on the board the last couple of days.

Anyway, I think the motivation for creating a conspiracy that is ultamately hatched long after you are dead (like the Federal Reserve in 1913) is so that you can create mystery and aura about yourself and give nutty authors stuff to write about.

In that vein, so far I have no offers from anyone to join my club in which club members will conspire to rule the universe. The plan will take some time and the expected fruition will be in 2108 or 2109.
We lay the ground work now to destroy the economy of the entire universe (not just Earth, we have to think big here because it’s in the future), while enriching our members. The plan will take some time to hatch, but in the end our members will rule the financial universe. If all goes well the plan will run its course by 2107 or 2109 at the latest.
Who’s with me ?[/quote]
And I’m sure that your sarcasm isn’t intended either. It does contribute to the original topic of this thread doesn’t it? THIS IS A BLOG, NOT A PUBLISHED PAPER.I’m not the one who said that the central banking is a conspiracy. Just wanted to get others opinion on what griffin said. But, a lot of you folks like to throw bombs instead of debating what griffin said. I applaud allen for being willing to take the subject at hand to heart and be willing to further study it. He is the only one on this entire thread that seems to be willing to do that. By the way, your nick name is “creep who left”. congrats!

[investor]

[quote=FormerSanDiegan][quote=investor][quote=FormerSanDiegan]I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.[/quote]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses? Same stupid method as Allen from Fallbrook and davelj.Why don’t you get back to the topic?[/quote]

I don’t know what you are talking about. I was not pointing out any typos, simply just typing what came to mind after reading through (well, skimming through) this thread. I made a post about … well… about posting nothing, but you still seemed to find fault with it and put me into a category of people who according to you use “stupid methods.” As far as I can tell the topic here is how people respond to other people on this blog, their qualifications and degrees and their personal beliefs on how one should or should not respond to post with or without cogent thought. In that vein I am simply trying to post thoughts in those same areas and trying to fit in with this thread since it is the hottest thread on the board the last couple of days.

Anyway, I think the motivation for creating a conspiracy that is ultamately hatched long after you are dead (like the Federal Reserve in 1913) is so that you can create mystery and aura about yourself and give nutty authors stuff to write about.

In that vein, so far I have no offers from anyone to join my club in which club members will conspire to rule the universe. The plan will take some time and the expected fruition will be in 2108 or 2109.
We lay the ground work now to destroy the economy of the entire universe (not just Earth, we have to think big here because it’s in the future), while enriching our members. The plan will take some time to hatch, but in the end our members will rule the financial universe. If all goes well the plan will run its course by 2107 or 2109 at the latest.
Who’s with me ?[/quote]
And I’m sure that your sarcasm isn’t intended either. It does contribute to the original topic of this thread doesn’t it? THIS IS A BLOG, NOT A PUBLISHED PAPER.I’m not the one who said that the central banking is a conspiracy. Just wanted to get others opinion on what griffin said. But, a lot of you folks like to throw bombs instead of debating what griffin said. I applaud allen for being willing to take the subject at hand to heart and be willing to further study it. He is the only one on this entire thread that seems to be willing to do that. By the way, your nick name is “creep who left”. congrats!

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I am a conservative, not a soros lover. Davelj jumps to invalid assumptions when he says that. But that doesn’t bother davelj. [/quote]

I find it humorous that you’re the only person who hasn’t figured this out: My references to George Soros have NOTHING to do with your politics. It’s a reference to your screen name “investor”. I envision you envisioning yourself flying off to Davos in your imaginary private jet to cavort with other Investors and Very Important People (with multiple Doctorates) at Davos and Gstaad. And that makes me chuckle.[/quote]
So, the only famous person you connect me with is a far left socialist and you say that it is because he is an investor? No way am I buying that. In fact, I have a nick name for davelj, Dave who Loves to Jump to conclusions. I think that it most appropriate, don’t you?

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I am a conservative, not a soros lover. Davelj jumps to invalid assumptions when he says that. But that doesn’t bother davelj. [/quote]

I find it humorous that you’re the only person who hasn’t figured this out: My references to George Soros have NOTHING to do with your politics. It’s a reference to your screen name “investor”. I envision you envisioning yourself flying off to Davos in your imaginary private jet to cavort with other Investors and Very Important People (with multiple Doctorates) at Davos and Gstaad. And that makes me chuckle.[/quote]
So, the only famous person you connect me with is a far left socialist and you say that it is because he is an investor? No way am I buying that. In fact, I have a nick name for davelj, Dave who Loves to Jump to conclusions. I think that it most appropriate, don’t you?

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I am a conservative, not a soros lover. Davelj jumps to invalid assumptions when he says that. But that doesn’t bother davelj. [/quote]

I find it humorous that you’re the only person who hasn’t figured this out: My references to George Soros have NOTHING to do with your politics. It’s a reference to your screen name “investor”. I envision you envisioning yourself flying off to Davos in your imaginary private jet to cavort with other Investors and Very Important People (with multiple Doctorates) at Davos and Gstaad. And that makes me chuckle.[/quote]
So, the only famous person you connect me with is a far left socialist and you say that it is because he is an investor? No way am I buying that. In fact, I have a nick name for davelj, Dave who Loves to Jump to conclusions. I think that it most appropriate, don’t you?

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I am a conservative, not a soros lover. Davelj jumps to invalid assumptions when he says that. But that doesn’t bother davelj. [/quote]

I find it humorous that you’re the only person who hasn’t figured this out: My references to George Soros have NOTHING to do with your politics. It’s a reference to your screen name “investor”. I envision you envisioning yourself flying off to Davos in your imaginary private jet to cavort with other Investors and Very Important People (with multiple Doctorates) at Davos and Gstaad. And that makes me chuckle.[/quote]
So, the only famous person you connect me with is a far left socialist and you say that it is because he is an investor? No way am I buying that. In fact, I have a nick name for davelj, Dave who Loves to Jump to conclusions. I think that it most appropriate, don’t you?

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I am a conservative, not a soros lover. Davelj jumps to invalid assumptions when he says that. But that doesn’t bother davelj. [/quote]

I find it humorous that you’re the only person who hasn’t figured this out: My references to George Soros have NOTHING to do with your politics. It’s a reference to your screen name “investor”. I envision you envisioning yourself flying off to Davos in your imaginary private jet to cavort with other Investors and Very Important People (with multiple Doctorates) at Davos and Gstaad. And that makes me chuckle.[/quote]
So, the only famous person you connect me with is a far left socialist and you say that it is because he is an investor? No way am I buying that. In fact, I have a nick name for davelj, Dave who Loves to Jump to conclusions. I think that it most appropriate, don’t you?

[Author]

Posts