Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
gverdi
ParticipantGot a gem in Santee:
http://www.sdlookup.com/MLS-072059857-9723_Roe_Dr_Santee_CA_92071
August 27, 2007 at 10:19 PM in reply to: San Diego year over year inventories down for third month in a row #81851ParticipantHehehehe … MLS … NAR …
Don’t know how they keep inventory data these days 😉 !!
Anyway, based on ziprelty’s data, today’s inventory is 23444 which is actually HIGHER then 2006 peak inventory which was 23385 achieved in July 2006:
http://www.ziprealty.com/registration/register.jsp?metro=sandiego
More details here:
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2007/01/tracking-san-diego.htmlI guess it all depends from where you get the data … 😉
August 27, 2007 at 10:19 PM in reply to: San Diego year over year inventories down for third month in a row #81986ParticipantHehehehe … MLS … NAR …
Don’t know how they keep inventory data these days 😉 !!
Anyway, based on ziprelty’s data, today’s inventory is 23444 which is actually HIGHER then 2006 peak inventory which was 23385 achieved in July 2006:
http://www.ziprealty.com/registration/register.jsp?metro=sandiego
More details here:
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2007/01/tracking-san-diego.htmlI guess it all depends from where you get the data … 😉
August 27, 2007 at 10:19 PM in reply to: San Diego year over year inventories down for third month in a row #82003ParticipantHehehehe … MLS … NAR …
Don’t know how they keep inventory data these days 😉 !!
Anyway, based on ziprelty’s data, today’s inventory is 23444 which is actually HIGHER then 2006 peak inventory which was 23385 achieved in July 2006:
http://www.ziprealty.com/registration/register.jsp?metro=sandiego
More details here:
http://bubbletracking.blogspot.com/2007/01/tracking-san-diego.htmlI guess it all depends from where you get the data … 😉
Participantsdr,
The numbers I posted are real and includes SFA/Condos.
I did not see any devastation but I merely computed the TOTAL 92130 closed sales for these months/years.
Participantsdr,
The numbers I posted are real and includes SFA/Condos.
I did not see any devastation but I merely computed the TOTAL 92130 closed sales for these months/years.
ParticipantDeleted
ParticipantDeleted
ParticipantCB, these are the April closed sales for previous years in 92130:
Apr. 2006: 121
Apr. 2005: 122
Apr. 2004: 54The 2007 numbers also include new houses which were sold through MLS which was not the case when the market was hot and the speculators were scooping up the houses straight from the developer.
ParticipantCB, these are the April closed sales for previous years in 92130:
Apr. 2006: 121
Apr. 2005: 122
Apr. 2004: 54The 2007 numbers also include new houses which were sold through MLS which was not the case when the market was hot and the speculators were scooping up the houses straight from the developer.
ParticipantLong time reader… first post.
Sales are dwindling faster then someone thinks. Even Carmel Valley-92130 (sdrealtor’s belleweather) it’s feeling the pain. Here are the number of monthly closed sales in 92130:
Jan. 2007: 57 sales
Feb. 2007: 72 sales
Mar. 2007: 137 sales
Apr. 2007: 74 salesI’m waiting until all the May late reports get posted but if
somebody have the final May number for 92130 please post.The “spring kick” it’s over!
ParticipantLong time reader… first post.
Sales are dwindling faster then someone thinks. Even Carmel Valley-92130 (sdrealtor’s belleweather) it’s feeling the pain. Here are the number of monthly closed sales in 92130:
Jan. 2007: 57 sales
Feb. 2007: 72 sales
Mar. 2007: 137 sales
Apr. 2007: 74 salesI’m waiting until all the May late reports get posted but if
somebody have the final May number for 92130 please post.The “spring kick” it’s over!
-
AuthorPosts
