[gn]

Eugene,

Thanks for the good explanation. I didn’t know that a school district would bus students from as far away from Scripps as from “south of the 8”. I thought the district would go to nearby areas like Mira Mesa/Sorrento Valley or Tierra Santa. Does anyone know how a school district would go about doing this ? Previously, I like Scripps a lot but this issue concerns me.

Enron,

I think you are right about the difference between north & south Scripps. I know a parent who lives in Mira Mesa & tried to get her son into Dingeman, but she couldn’t. He ended up going to Jerabek.

[gn]

Eugene,

Thanks for the good explanation. I didn’t know that a school district would bus students from as far away from Scripps as from “south of the 8”. I thought the district would go to nearby areas like Mira Mesa/Sorrento Valley or Tierra Santa. Does anyone know how a school district would go about doing this ? Previously, I like Scripps a lot but this issue concerns me.

Enron,

I think you are right about the difference between north & south Scripps. I know a parent who lives in Mira Mesa & tried to get her son into Dingeman, but she couldn’t. He ended up going to Jerabek.

[gn]

Eugene,

Thanks for the good explanation. I didn’t know that a school district would bus students from as far away from Scripps as from “south of the 8”. I thought the district would go to nearby areas like Mira Mesa/Sorrento Valley or Tierra Santa. Does anyone know how a school district would go about doing this ? Previously, I like Scripps a lot but this issue concerns me.

Enron,

I think you are right about the difference between north & south Scripps. I know a parent who lives in Mira Mesa & tried to get her son into Dingeman, but she couldn’t. He ended up going to Jerabek.

[gn]

Eugene,

Thanks for the good explanation. I didn’t know that a school district would bus students from as far away from Scripps as from “south of the 8”. I thought the district would go to nearby areas like Mira Mesa/Sorrento Valley or Tierra Santa. Does anyone know how a school district would go about doing this ? Previously, I like Scripps a lot but this issue concerns me.

Enron,

I think you are right about the difference between north & south Scripps. I know a parent who lives in Mira Mesa & tried to get her son into Dingeman, but she couldn’t. He ended up going to Jerabek.

[gn]

Eugene,

Thanks for the good explanation. I didn’t know that a school district would bus students from as far away from Scripps as from “south of the 8”. I thought the district would go to nearby areas like Mira Mesa/Sorrento Valley or Tierra Santa. Does anyone know how a school district would go about doing this ? Previously, I like Scripps a lot but this issue concerns me.

Enron,

I think you are right about the difference between north & south Scripps. I know a parent who lives in Mira Mesa & tried to get her son into Dingeman, but she couldn’t. He ended up going to Jerabek.

[gn]

ocrenter,

Is this because in the older parts of Scripps, the children of the homeowners are growing out of school age ? If that is true, then other neighborhoods like Carmel Valley would have the same problem, wouldn’t they ?

[gn]

ocrenter,

Is this because in the older parts of Scripps, the children of the homeowners are growing out of school age ? If that is true, then other neighborhoods like Carmel Valley would have the same problem, wouldn’t they ?

[gn]

ocrenter,

Is this because in the older parts of Scripps, the children of the homeowners are growing out of school age ? If that is true, then other neighborhoods like Carmel Valley would have the same problem, wouldn’t they ?

[gn]

ocrenter,

Is this because in the older parts of Scripps, the children of the homeowners are growing out of school age ? If that is true, then other neighborhoods like Carmel Valley would have the same problem, wouldn’t they ?

[gn]

ocrenter,

Is this because in the older parts of Scripps, the children of the homeowners are growing out of school age ? If that is true, then other neighborhoods like Carmel Valley would have the same problem, wouldn’t they ?

[gn]

[quote=analyst]The typical situation would be that the new terms do not include a principle reduction. Usually some amount of principle is set to an interest rate of zero and a payment rate of zero, but is still due, hopefully to be collected in the future after values rise again.

The lender will now collect a substantial payment instead of zero. The gutted mark-to-market rules allow the lender to avoid writing down the asset value and capital value.[/quote]

I’m with analyst. That 200k was just set aside by the lender, not completely forgiven.

sdrealtor, why don’t you read the loan docs.

[gn]

[quote=analyst]The typical situation would be that the new terms do not include a principle reduction. Usually some amount of principle is set to an interest rate of zero and a payment rate of zero, but is still due, hopefully to be collected in the future after values rise again.

The lender will now collect a substantial payment instead of zero. The gutted mark-to-market rules allow the lender to avoid writing down the asset value and capital value.[/quote]

I’m with analyst. That 200k was just set aside by the lender, not completely forgiven.

sdrealtor, why don’t you read the loan docs.

[gn]

[quote=analyst]The typical situation would be that the new terms do not include a principle reduction. Usually some amount of principle is set to an interest rate of zero and a payment rate of zero, but is still due, hopefully to be collected in the future after values rise again.

The lender will now collect a substantial payment instead of zero. The gutted mark-to-market rules allow the lender to avoid writing down the asset value and capital value.[/quote]

I’m with analyst. That 200k was just set aside by the lender, not completely forgiven.

sdrealtor, why don’t you read the loan docs.

[gn]

[quote=analyst]The typical situation would be that the new terms do not include a principle reduction. Usually some amount of principle is set to an interest rate of zero and a payment rate of zero, but is still due, hopefully to be collected in the future after values rise again.

The lender will now collect a substantial payment instead of zero. The gutted mark-to-market rules allow the lender to avoid writing down the asset value and capital value.[/quote]

I’m with analyst. That 200k was just set aside by the lender, not completely forgiven.

sdrealtor, why don’t you read the loan docs.

[gn]

[quote=analyst]The typical situation would be that the new terms do not include a principle reduction. Usually some amount of principle is set to an interest rate of zero and a payment rate of zero, but is still due, hopefully to be collected in the future after values rise again.

The lender will now collect a substantial payment instead of zero. The gutted mark-to-market rules allow the lender to avoid writing down the asset value and capital value.[/quote]

I’m with analyst. That 200k was just set aside by the lender, not completely forgiven.

sdrealtor, why don’t you read the loan docs.

[Author]

Posts