Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM in reply to: Gary Shilling On Why Underwater Homeowners Will Double From 23% to 40% Shortly #622054October 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM in reply to: Gary Shilling On Why Underwater Homeowners Will Double From 23% to 40% Shortly #622137
gandalf
ParticipantIt’s really genuinely amazing to me how much prices have dropped from the peak in nominal terms. More than I expected, I thought things would be stickier. They are in some places, certain neighborhoods.
Overall, this is just an epic business cycle, historic boom and a catastrophic bust, one for the ages. It’s a curse to be born in interesting times.
Honestly not sure what happens from here, dollar crisis at some point tops the list. Easy to see it deteriorating further, especially with joblessness. Genuine broad-based recovery will take another couple of years, at least.
October 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM in reply to: Gary Shilling On Why Underwater Homeowners Will Double From 23% to 40% Shortly #622697ParticipantIt’s really genuinely amazing to me how much prices have dropped from the peak in nominal terms. More than I expected, I thought things would be stickier. They are in some places, certain neighborhoods.
Overall, this is just an epic business cycle, historic boom and a catastrophic bust, one for the ages. It’s a curse to be born in interesting times.
Honestly not sure what happens from here, dollar crisis at some point tops the list. Easy to see it deteriorating further, especially with joblessness. Genuine broad-based recovery will take another couple of years, at least.
October 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM in reply to: Gary Shilling On Why Underwater Homeowners Will Double From 23% to 40% Shortly #622821ParticipantIt’s really genuinely amazing to me how much prices have dropped from the peak in nominal terms. More than I expected, I thought things would be stickier. They are in some places, certain neighborhoods.
Overall, this is just an epic business cycle, historic boom and a catastrophic bust, one for the ages. It’s a curse to be born in interesting times.
Honestly not sure what happens from here, dollar crisis at some point tops the list. Easy to see it deteriorating further, especially with joblessness. Genuine broad-based recovery will take another couple of years, at least.
October 23, 2010 at 10:03 PM in reply to: Gary Shilling On Why Underwater Homeowners Will Double From 23% to 40% Shortly #623139ParticipantIt’s really genuinely amazing to me how much prices have dropped from the peak in nominal terms. More than I expected, I thought things would be stickier. They are in some places, certain neighborhoods.
Overall, this is just an epic business cycle, historic boom and a catastrophic bust, one for the ages. It’s a curse to be born in interesting times.
Honestly not sure what happens from here, dollar crisis at some point tops the list. Easy to see it deteriorating further, especially with joblessness. Genuine broad-based recovery will take another couple of years, at least.
Participantjstoesz – with all due respect, you’re missing the point. Religion is already taught in public school — as part of various history, culture, social studies curricula. Christianity receives ample coverage.
The issue with Christine O’Donnell, with the Texas School Board, with the psychotic facist Christian right-wing base, is they want to teach the Biblical Creation Story as SCIENCE. That was context of O’Donnell’s remarks during the debate, Intelligent Design in Science Class. That is the issue.
Genesis is not Science. The Earth is more than 6,000 years old. Religion and faith, by definition, do not lend themselves to Scientific Inquiry. If we believe the Bible and practice Christianity, faith and the nature of God is not something that can be experimentally ‘proven’ or ‘disproven’.
Teaching Adam and Eve in Science Class is not a CHOICE that broadens one’s horizons. It’s a bastardization of truth, education and knowledge. It’s completely NOT SCIENCE. It’s the opposite, it’s untrue, and it’s STOOPID.
My objections aren’t a ‘liberal’ thing, or an ‘anti-Christian’ thing, or a ‘secular humanism’ thing. It’s an objection to stupidity. The truth is not relative here.
Participantjstoesz – with all due respect, you’re missing the point. Religion is already taught in public school — as part of various history, culture, social studies curricula. Christianity receives ample coverage.
The issue with Christine O’Donnell, with the Texas School Board, with the psychotic facist Christian right-wing base, is they want to teach the Biblical Creation Story as SCIENCE. That was context of O’Donnell’s remarks during the debate, Intelligent Design in Science Class. That is the issue.
Genesis is not Science. The Earth is more than 6,000 years old. Religion and faith, by definition, do not lend themselves to Scientific Inquiry. If we believe the Bible and practice Christianity, faith and the nature of God is not something that can be experimentally ‘proven’ or ‘disproven’.
Teaching Adam and Eve in Science Class is not a CHOICE that broadens one’s horizons. It’s a bastardization of truth, education and knowledge. It’s completely NOT SCIENCE. It’s the opposite, it’s untrue, and it’s STOOPID.
My objections aren’t a ‘liberal’ thing, or an ‘anti-Christian’ thing, or a ‘secular humanism’ thing. It’s an objection to stupidity. The truth is not relative here.
Participantjstoesz – with all due respect, you’re missing the point. Religion is already taught in public school — as part of various history, culture, social studies curricula. Christianity receives ample coverage.
The issue with Christine O’Donnell, with the Texas School Board, with the psychotic facist Christian right-wing base, is they want to teach the Biblical Creation Story as SCIENCE. That was context of O’Donnell’s remarks during the debate, Intelligent Design in Science Class. That is the issue.
Genesis is not Science. The Earth is more than 6,000 years old. Religion and faith, by definition, do not lend themselves to Scientific Inquiry. If we believe the Bible and practice Christianity, faith and the nature of God is not something that can be experimentally ‘proven’ or ‘disproven’.
Teaching Adam and Eve in Science Class is not a CHOICE that broadens one’s horizons. It’s a bastardization of truth, education and knowledge. It’s completely NOT SCIENCE. It’s the opposite, it’s untrue, and it’s STOOPID.
My objections aren’t a ‘liberal’ thing, or an ‘anti-Christian’ thing, or a ‘secular humanism’ thing. It’s an objection to stupidity. The truth is not relative here.
Participantjstoesz – with all due respect, you’re missing the point. Religion is already taught in public school — as part of various history, culture, social studies curricula. Christianity receives ample coverage.
The issue with Christine O’Donnell, with the Texas School Board, with the psychotic facist Christian right-wing base, is they want to teach the Biblical Creation Story as SCIENCE. That was context of O’Donnell’s remarks during the debate, Intelligent Design in Science Class. That is the issue.
Genesis is not Science. The Earth is more than 6,000 years old. Religion and faith, by definition, do not lend themselves to Scientific Inquiry. If we believe the Bible and practice Christianity, faith and the nature of God is not something that can be experimentally ‘proven’ or ‘disproven’.
Teaching Adam and Eve in Science Class is not a CHOICE that broadens one’s horizons. It’s a bastardization of truth, education and knowledge. It’s completely NOT SCIENCE. It’s the opposite, it’s untrue, and it’s STOOPID.
My objections aren’t a ‘liberal’ thing, or an ‘anti-Christian’ thing, or a ‘secular humanism’ thing. It’s an objection to stupidity. The truth is not relative here.
Participantjstoesz – with all due respect, you’re missing the point. Religion is already taught in public school — as part of various history, culture, social studies curricula. Christianity receives ample coverage.
The issue with Christine O’Donnell, with the Texas School Board, with the psychotic facist Christian right-wing base, is they want to teach the Biblical Creation Story as SCIENCE. That was context of O’Donnell’s remarks during the debate, Intelligent Design in Science Class. That is the issue.
Genesis is not Science. The Earth is more than 6,000 years old. Religion and faith, by definition, do not lend themselves to Scientific Inquiry. If we believe the Bible and practice Christianity, faith and the nature of God is not something that can be experimentally ‘proven’ or ‘disproven’.
Teaching Adam and Eve in Science Class is not a CHOICE that broadens one’s horizons. It’s a bastardization of truth, education and knowledge. It’s completely NOT SCIENCE. It’s the opposite, it’s untrue, and it’s STOOPID.
My objections aren’t a ‘liberal’ thing, or an ‘anti-Christian’ thing, or a ‘secular humanism’ thing. It’s an objection to stupidity. The truth is not relative here.
ParticipantExcellent comments, eaves. Very insightful, arraya.
American Taliban, Muslim Jihadis, no difference.
ParticipantExcellent comments, eaves. Very insightful, arraya.
American Taliban, Muslim Jihadis, no difference.
ParticipantExcellent comments, eaves. Very insightful, arraya.
American Taliban, Muslim Jihadis, no difference.
ParticipantExcellent comments, eaves. Very insightful, arraya.
American Taliban, Muslim Jihadis, no difference.
ParticipantExcellent comments, eaves. Very insightful, arraya.
American Taliban, Muslim Jihadis, no difference.
-
AuthorPosts
