Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM in reply to: Going on the radio this afternoon… quick questions for the piggs #673263March 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM in reply to: Going on the radio this afternoon… quick questions for the piggs #673321
gandalf
ParticipantWhat an excellent thread!
Income figures, plus availability and cost of credit. My guess, I think 1999-2000 baseline is about right.
Lots of ‘noise’ in the system still.
Also, I think it’s not just median incomes, as income and wealth distribution is continuing to skew upwards. (I suspect that’s why we’re still doing alright here in my zip code.)
Appreciate comparing notes. Thanks all.
March 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM in reply to: Going on the radio this afternoon… quick questions for the piggs #673932ParticipantWhat an excellent thread!
Income figures, plus availability and cost of credit. My guess, I think 1999-2000 baseline is about right.
Lots of ‘noise’ in the system still.
Also, I think it’s not just median incomes, as income and wealth distribution is continuing to skew upwards. (I suspect that’s why we’re still doing alright here in my zip code.)
Appreciate comparing notes. Thanks all.
March 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM in reply to: Going on the radio this afternoon… quick questions for the piggs #674069ParticipantWhat an excellent thread!
Income figures, plus availability and cost of credit. My guess, I think 1999-2000 baseline is about right.
Lots of ‘noise’ in the system still.
Also, I think it’s not just median incomes, as income and wealth distribution is continuing to skew upwards. (I suspect that’s why we’re still doing alright here in my zip code.)
Appreciate comparing notes. Thanks all.
March 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM in reply to: Going on the radio this afternoon… quick questions for the piggs #674416ParticipantWhat an excellent thread!
Income figures, plus availability and cost of credit. My guess, I think 1999-2000 baseline is about right.
Lots of ‘noise’ in the system still.
Also, I think it’s not just median incomes, as income and wealth distribution is continuing to skew upwards. (I suspect that’s why we’re still doing alright here in my zip code.)
Appreciate comparing notes. Thanks all.
ParticipantNo, no, no — no, TG. Get a hold of yourself, man…
The dude had sex with his girlfriend. What’s the big deal?! By any reasonable measure, he’s not going to hell.
As for BYU’s honor code, it’s not all that. If we’ve learned anything from preachy moral people, they’re usually the opposite.
From #3 in the country, to ass-whooping from NM…
Woot!
ParticipantNo, no, no — no, TG. Get a hold of yourself, man…
The dude had sex with his girlfriend. What’s the big deal?! By any reasonable measure, he’s not going to hell.
As for BYU’s honor code, it’s not all that. If we’ve learned anything from preachy moral people, they’re usually the opposite.
From #3 in the country, to ass-whooping from NM…
Woot!
ParticipantNo, no, no — no, TG. Get a hold of yourself, man…
The dude had sex with his girlfriend. What’s the big deal?! By any reasonable measure, he’s not going to hell.
As for BYU’s honor code, it’s not all that. If we’ve learned anything from preachy moral people, they’re usually the opposite.
From #3 in the country, to ass-whooping from NM…
Woot!
ParticipantNo, no, no — no, TG. Get a hold of yourself, man…
The dude had sex with his girlfriend. What’s the big deal?! By any reasonable measure, he’s not going to hell.
As for BYU’s honor code, it’s not all that. If we’ve learned anything from preachy moral people, they’re usually the opposite.
From #3 in the country, to ass-whooping from NM…
Woot!
ParticipantNo, no, no — no, TG. Get a hold of yourself, man…
The dude had sex with his girlfriend. What’s the big deal?! By any reasonable measure, he’s not going to hell.
As for BYU’s honor code, it’s not all that. If we’ve learned anything from preachy moral people, they’re usually the opposite.
From #3 in the country, to ass-whooping from NM…
Woot!
Participant[quote=frenchlambda]
Why does a simple question about the iPad need to become a political issue?[/quote]Yeah, that’s pretty much what I thought too.
What can you say? Lots of douchebags out there.
With the iPad2, yeah, looking forward to the release. We’re using them for work — surprisingly. Useful device. I don’t like the platform though. Apple is kind of a ball-twister.
Participant[quote=frenchlambda]
Why does a simple question about the iPad need to become a political issue?[/quote]Yeah, that’s pretty much what I thought too.
What can you say? Lots of douchebags out there.
With the iPad2, yeah, looking forward to the release. We’re using them for work — surprisingly. Useful device. I don’t like the platform though. Apple is kind of a ball-twister.
Participant[quote=frenchlambda]
Why does a simple question about the iPad need to become a political issue?[/quote]Yeah, that’s pretty much what I thought too.
What can you say? Lots of douchebags out there.
With the iPad2, yeah, looking forward to the release. We’re using them for work — surprisingly. Useful device. I don’t like the platform though. Apple is kind of a ball-twister.
Participant[quote=frenchlambda]
Why does a simple question about the iPad need to become a political issue?[/quote]Yeah, that’s pretty much what I thought too.
What can you say? Lots of douchebags out there.
With the iPad2, yeah, looking forward to the release. We’re using them for work — surprisingly. Useful device. I don’t like the platform though. Apple is kind of a ball-twister.
Participant[quote=frenchlambda]
Why does a simple question about the iPad need to become a political issue?[/quote]Yeah, that’s pretty much what I thought too.
What can you say? Lots of douchebags out there.
With the iPad2, yeah, looking forward to the release. We’re using them for work — surprisingly. Useful device. I don’t like the platform though. Apple is kind of a ball-twister.
-
AuthorPosts
