Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
gandalf
ParticipantGreat discussion, enjoyed reading. One of the best FP threads in a long while.
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]The problem with allowing the Europeans to “own” this, is that they won’t. And we all know it. Why? Because they’re bigger pussies than Obama.
[/quote]That made me laugh.
ParticipantGreat discussion, enjoyed reading. One of the best FP threads in a long while.
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]The problem with allowing the Europeans to “own” this, is that they won’t. And we all know it. Why? Because they’re bigger pussies than Obama.
[/quote]That made me laugh.
ParticipantGreat discussion, enjoyed reading. One of the best FP threads in a long while.
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]The problem with allowing the Europeans to “own” this, is that they won’t. And we all know it. Why? Because they’re bigger pussies than Obama.
[/quote]That made me laugh.
ParticipantGreat discussion, enjoyed reading. One of the best FP threads in a long while.
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]The problem with allowing the Europeans to “own” this, is that they won’t. And we all know it. Why? Because they’re bigger pussies than Obama.
[/quote]That made me laugh.
Participant[quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.
Participant[quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.
Participant[quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.
Participant[quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.
Participant[quote=paramount]I would say no more than 90% of our financial problems were caused by the public employee unions in California.[/quote]
Back it up, paramount. Bring facts.
Or were you just ‘making shit up’?
I see some problems with public unions, what’s happened here in the City of San Diego is corrupt to the core.
But compared to getting gang-raped by the financial industry, the problems are minor. Do the math. As a matter of proportion, we have bigger problems than unions.
Right-wing populists, tea partiers, should be upset with wall street, banks and corporations. Instead they bitch to no end about liberals, unions and hollywood.
Entire generation of clueless idiots re-living Vietnam while corporations and robber barons plunder the country into oblivion.
March 17, 2011 at 10:19 PM in reply to: OT – Should the government fund the press, the arts and the sciences? #678180ParticipantI have a different take. Consuming media isn’t like buying goods in a grocery store. It’s a different market model.
The costs of production, broadcast, etc. are heavily financed and paid for by corporate marketing and advertisers, and increasingly, by powerful, well-capitalized interests that have a stake in influencing how you view the world.
Couple million dollars for public radio? It’s peanuts. Who cares?
A couple TRILLION for CitiBank, Goldman and Chase? Believe me, NPR isn’t the problem. Wall Street is THE PROBLEM. The undue power and influence of corporations in THE PROBLEM. We’ll never get accurate truthful information on any of this from a corporate press driven by ratings, profits and ideology.
March 17, 2011 at 10:19 PM in reply to: OT – Should the government fund the press, the arts and the sciences? #678236ParticipantI have a different take. Consuming media isn’t like buying goods in a grocery store. It’s a different market model.
The costs of production, broadcast, etc. are heavily financed and paid for by corporate marketing and advertisers, and increasingly, by powerful, well-capitalized interests that have a stake in influencing how you view the world.
Couple million dollars for public radio? It’s peanuts. Who cares?
A couple TRILLION for CitiBank, Goldman and Chase? Believe me, NPR isn’t the problem. Wall Street is THE PROBLEM. The undue power and influence of corporations in THE PROBLEM. We’ll never get accurate truthful information on any of this from a corporate press driven by ratings, profits and ideology.
March 17, 2011 at 10:19 PM in reply to: OT – Should the government fund the press, the arts and the sciences? #678837ParticipantI have a different take. Consuming media isn’t like buying goods in a grocery store. It’s a different market model.
The costs of production, broadcast, etc. are heavily financed and paid for by corporate marketing and advertisers, and increasingly, by powerful, well-capitalized interests that have a stake in influencing how you view the world.
Couple million dollars for public radio? It’s peanuts. Who cares?
A couple TRILLION for CitiBank, Goldman and Chase? Believe me, NPR isn’t the problem. Wall Street is THE PROBLEM. The undue power and influence of corporations in THE PROBLEM. We’ll never get accurate truthful information on any of this from a corporate press driven by ratings, profits and ideology.
March 17, 2011 at 10:19 PM in reply to: OT – Should the government fund the press, the arts and the sciences? #678972ParticipantI have a different take. Consuming media isn’t like buying goods in a grocery store. It’s a different market model.
The costs of production, broadcast, etc. are heavily financed and paid for by corporate marketing and advertisers, and increasingly, by powerful, well-capitalized interests that have a stake in influencing how you view the world.
Couple million dollars for public radio? It’s peanuts. Who cares?
A couple TRILLION for CitiBank, Goldman and Chase? Believe me, NPR isn’t the problem. Wall Street is THE PROBLEM. The undue power and influence of corporations in THE PROBLEM. We’ll never get accurate truthful information on any of this from a corporate press driven by ratings, profits and ideology.
March 17, 2011 at 10:19 PM in reply to: OT – Should the government fund the press, the arts and the sciences? #679315ParticipantI have a different take. Consuming media isn’t like buying goods in a grocery store. It’s a different market model.
The costs of production, broadcast, etc. are heavily financed and paid for by corporate marketing and advertisers, and increasingly, by powerful, well-capitalized interests that have a stake in influencing how you view the world.
Couple million dollars for public radio? It’s peanuts. Who cares?
A couple TRILLION for CitiBank, Goldman and Chase? Believe me, NPR isn’t the problem. Wall Street is THE PROBLEM. The undue power and influence of corporations in THE PROBLEM. We’ll never get accurate truthful information on any of this from a corporate press driven by ratings, profits and ideology.
-
AuthorPosts
