Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
gandalf
ParticipantAllan, you’re raising the level of dialogue here, a class act. Have to break right now, family time for rest of day. I’ll try to follow-up later, hopefully this evening. Good questions, BTW. What I was hoping for when I started the thread…
BTW, I believe Obama’s position on Pakistan is that he would send troops in-country if there was actionable intelligence on Al Qaeda, which is a bit different from out-and-out attacking Pakistan. I could be wrong. I’ll double-check later.
Best,
GParticipantAllan, you’re raising the level of dialogue here, a class act. Have to break right now, family time for rest of day. I’ll try to follow-up later, hopefully this evening. Good questions, BTW. What I was hoping for when I started the thread…
BTW, I believe Obama’s position on Pakistan is that he would send troops in-country if there was actionable intelligence on Al Qaeda, which is a bit different from out-and-out attacking Pakistan. I could be wrong. I’ll double-check later.
Best,
GParticipantAllan, you’re raising the level of dialogue here, a class act. Have to break right now, family time for rest of day. I’ll try to follow-up later, hopefully this evening. Good questions, BTW. What I was hoping for when I started the thread…
BTW, I believe Obama’s position on Pakistan is that he would send troops in-country if there was actionable intelligence on Al Qaeda, which is a bit different from out-and-out attacking Pakistan. I could be wrong. I’ll double-check later.
Best,
GParticipantAllan, you’re raising the level of dialogue here, a class act. Have to break right now, family time for rest of day. I’ll try to follow-up later, hopefully this evening. Good questions, BTW. What I was hoping for when I started the thread…
BTW, I believe Obama’s position on Pakistan is that he would send troops in-country if there was actionable intelligence on Al Qaeda, which is a bit different from out-and-out attacking Pakistan. I could be wrong. I’ll double-check later.
Best,
GParticipantThat’s well-said, aecetia. Not-so-crazy ramblings.
ParticipantThat’s well-said, aecetia. Not-so-crazy ramblings.
ParticipantThat’s well-said, aecetia. Not-so-crazy ramblings.
ParticipantThat’s well-said, aecetia. Not-so-crazy ramblings.
ParticipantThat’s well-said, aecetia. Not-so-crazy ramblings.
ParticipantWell okay, casca. Sounds good to me.
surveyor, looks fine. Off-topic, but that’s okay.
* * *
Anybody care to comment on the article?
The premise is that Obama’s foreign policy positions are more pragmatic and conservative than Bush/McCain with the ideology and interventionism that characterizes republican foreign policy positions in recent years.
Thoughts about Obama’s positions in the historical framework of US foreign policy?
ParticipantWell okay, casca. Sounds good to me.
surveyor, looks fine. Off-topic, but that’s okay.
* * *
Anybody care to comment on the article?
The premise is that Obama’s foreign policy positions are more pragmatic and conservative than Bush/McCain with the ideology and interventionism that characterizes republican foreign policy positions in recent years.
Thoughts about Obama’s positions in the historical framework of US foreign policy?
ParticipantWell okay, casca. Sounds good to me.
surveyor, looks fine. Off-topic, but that’s okay.
* * *
Anybody care to comment on the article?
The premise is that Obama’s foreign policy positions are more pragmatic and conservative than Bush/McCain with the ideology and interventionism that characterizes republican foreign policy positions in recent years.
Thoughts about Obama’s positions in the historical framework of US foreign policy?
ParticipantWell okay, casca. Sounds good to me.
surveyor, looks fine. Off-topic, but that’s okay.
* * *
Anybody care to comment on the article?
The premise is that Obama’s foreign policy positions are more pragmatic and conservative than Bush/McCain with the ideology and interventionism that characterizes republican foreign policy positions in recent years.
Thoughts about Obama’s positions in the historical framework of US foreign policy?
ParticipantWell okay, casca. Sounds good to me.
surveyor, looks fine. Off-topic, but that’s okay.
* * *
Anybody care to comment on the article?
The premise is that Obama’s foreign policy positions are more pragmatic and conservative than Bush/McCain with the ideology and interventionism that characterizes republican foreign policy positions in recent years.
Thoughts about Obama’s positions in the historical framework of US foreign policy?
-
AuthorPosts
