Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
gandalf
Participantmeadandale, on a more level note, you may be correct. The next four years are going to be enormously challenging, whether it’s McCain or Obama (both of whom are more than qualified to serve, BTW). Our country is in a deep hole on a number of issues — the economy, energy, foreign policy, terrorism, corruption, legal/judicial, etc. I hope we’re able to make progress.
gandalf
Participantmeadandale, on a more level note, you may be correct. The next four years are going to be enormously challenging, whether it’s McCain or Obama (both of whom are more than qualified to serve, BTW). Our country is in a deep hole on a number of issues — the economy, energy, foreign policy, terrorism, corruption, legal/judicial, etc. I hope we’re able to make progress.
gandalf
Participantmeadandale, on a more level note, you may be correct. The next four years are going to be enormously challenging, whether it’s McCain or Obama (both of whom are more than qualified to serve, BTW). Our country is in a deep hole on a number of issues — the economy, energy, foreign policy, terrorism, corruption, legal/judicial, etc. I hope we’re able to make progress.
gandalf
Participantmeadandale, on a more level note, you may be correct. The next four years are going to be enormously challenging, whether it’s McCain or Obama (both of whom are more than qualified to serve, BTW). Our country is in a deep hole on a number of issues — the economy, energy, foreign policy, terrorism, corruption, legal/judicial, etc. I hope we’re able to make progress.
gandalf
Participantcasca: To what do you attribute this statement?
“There are breathtaking gaps in the education of the man who has never had a job…”
What facts? Backup your statement. There is no basis.
In the same post, you rail about registering ‘negros’ to vote, as if there’s something wrong with that. BTW, I haven’t heard anybody use the term ‘negro’ in ages.
You can call it character and patriotism, whatever helps you rationalize it. I call it partisan and racist.
gandalf
Participantcasca: To what do you attribute this statement?
“There are breathtaking gaps in the education of the man who has never had a job…”
What facts? Backup your statement. There is no basis.
In the same post, you rail about registering ‘negros’ to vote, as if there’s something wrong with that. BTW, I haven’t heard anybody use the term ‘negro’ in ages.
You can call it character and patriotism, whatever helps you rationalize it. I call it partisan and racist.
gandalf
Participantcasca: To what do you attribute this statement?
“There are breathtaking gaps in the education of the man who has never had a job…”
What facts? Backup your statement. There is no basis.
In the same post, you rail about registering ‘negros’ to vote, as if there’s something wrong with that. BTW, I haven’t heard anybody use the term ‘negro’ in ages.
You can call it character and patriotism, whatever helps you rationalize it. I call it partisan and racist.
gandalf
Participantcasca: To what do you attribute this statement?
“There are breathtaking gaps in the education of the man who has never had a job…”
What facts? Backup your statement. There is no basis.
In the same post, you rail about registering ‘negros’ to vote, as if there’s something wrong with that. BTW, I haven’t heard anybody use the term ‘negro’ in ages.
You can call it character and patriotism, whatever helps you rationalize it. I call it partisan and racist.
gandalf
Participantcasca: To what do you attribute this statement?
“There are breathtaking gaps in the education of the man who has never had a job…”
What facts? Backup your statement. There is no basis.
In the same post, you rail about registering ‘negros’ to vote, as if there’s something wrong with that. BTW, I haven’t heard anybody use the term ‘negro’ in ages.
You can call it character and patriotism, whatever helps you rationalize it. I call it partisan and racist.
gandalf
ParticipantWow. Is this correct? I haven’t had time to read up on the specifics. So we’re essentially providing guarantees on the payment streams of all of these securities? That’s amazing.
Where do we get the money to cover this? The news outlets were talking about $25B as cost of Fannie/Freddie bailout. The cost of what you’re describing doesn’t sound even close to $25B. More like $1-2T. Your take as well?
gandalf
ParticipantWow. Is this correct? I haven’t had time to read up on the specifics. So we’re essentially providing guarantees on the payment streams of all of these securities? That’s amazing.
Where do we get the money to cover this? The news outlets were talking about $25B as cost of Fannie/Freddie bailout. The cost of what you’re describing doesn’t sound even close to $25B. More like $1-2T. Your take as well?
gandalf
ParticipantWow. Is this correct? I haven’t had time to read up on the specifics. So we’re essentially providing guarantees on the payment streams of all of these securities? That’s amazing.
Where do we get the money to cover this? The news outlets were talking about $25B as cost of Fannie/Freddie bailout. The cost of what you’re describing doesn’t sound even close to $25B. More like $1-2T. Your take as well?
gandalf
ParticipantWow. Is this correct? I haven’t had time to read up on the specifics. So we’re essentially providing guarantees on the payment streams of all of these securities? That’s amazing.
Where do we get the money to cover this? The news outlets were talking about $25B as cost of Fannie/Freddie bailout. The cost of what you’re describing doesn’t sound even close to $25B. More like $1-2T. Your take as well?
gandalf
ParticipantWow. Is this correct? I haven’t had time to read up on the specifics. So we’re essentially providing guarantees on the payment streams of all of these securities? That’s amazing.
Where do we get the money to cover this? The news outlets were talking about $25B as cost of Fannie/Freddie bailout. The cost of what you’re describing doesn’t sound even close to $25B. More like $1-2T. Your take as well?
-
AuthorPosts
