Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 24, 2010 at 7:33 AM in reply to: FHA ‘Short-Refi Program’ debt relief for underwater homeowners #609524September 24, 2010 at 7:33 AM in reply to: FHA ‘Short-Refi Program’ debt relief for underwater homeowners #609845
(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=BigGovernmentIsGood][quote=jficquette]I don’t know how or who really. Surely somebody would do a no doc for a high down payment and great credit. Shoot, make it 50% down. They can make money off of that.
John[/quote]
I ran a few searches, and it looks like no-doc is still around. It’s just much tougher to get one these days than it used to be.[/quote]
What do you mean by tougher ? More documentation ? More downpayment ? Higher credit score ?
September 22, 2010 at 1:56 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #608048(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=briansd1]
I always felt that married employees with kids were getting unfair benefits. They are getting benefits that cost more than for single employees. Employees with multiple kids are getting more benefits.I think that employer health care contribution should be the same amount for single or married employees. Anything over and above an amount should be picked up by the employee.
[/quote]
Great idea. When you start a company you should make this your policy.
September 22, 2010 at 1:56 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #608134(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=briansd1]
I always felt that married employees with kids were getting unfair benefits. They are getting benefits that cost more than for single employees. Employees with multiple kids are getting more benefits.I think that employer health care contribution should be the same amount for single or married employees. Anything over and above an amount should be picked up by the employee.
[/quote]
Great idea. When you start a company you should make this your policy.
September 22, 2010 at 1:56 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #608687(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=briansd1]
I always felt that married employees with kids were getting unfair benefits. They are getting benefits that cost more than for single employees. Employees with multiple kids are getting more benefits.I think that employer health care contribution should be the same amount for single or married employees. Anything over and above an amount should be picked up by the employee.
[/quote]
Great idea. When you start a company you should make this your policy.
September 22, 2010 at 1:56 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #608797(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=briansd1]
I always felt that married employees with kids were getting unfair benefits. They are getting benefits that cost more than for single employees. Employees with multiple kids are getting more benefits.I think that employer health care contribution should be the same amount for single or married employees. Anything over and above an amount should be picked up by the employee.
[/quote]
Great idea. When you start a company you should make this your policy.
September 22, 2010 at 1:56 PM in reply to: OT: Anyone hear the NPR interview about the person getting dependant care coverage from parents #609114(former)FormerSanDiegan
Participant[quote=briansd1]
I always felt that married employees with kids were getting unfair benefits. They are getting benefits that cost more than for single employees. Employees with multiple kids are getting more benefits.I think that employer health care contribution should be the same amount for single or married employees. Anything over and above an amount should be picked up by the employee.
[/quote]
Great idea. When you start a company you should make this your policy.
September 22, 2010 at 1:44 PM in reply to: Ok, Now that I’ve sold my home…I can’t find a decent rental now! #608023(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantI assume you are moving from a more expensive/urban region (e.g. San Diego or LA).
Since you will be new to the area, the best approach might be to consider temprarily renting an apartment, while you find a more ideal rental property.
September 22, 2010 at 1:44 PM in reply to: Ok, Now that I’ve sold my home…I can’t find a decent rental now! #608109(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantI assume you are moving from a more expensive/urban region (e.g. San Diego or LA).
Since you will be new to the area, the best approach might be to consider temprarily renting an apartment, while you find a more ideal rental property.
September 22, 2010 at 1:44 PM in reply to: Ok, Now that I’ve sold my home…I can’t find a decent rental now! #608661(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantI assume you are moving from a more expensive/urban region (e.g. San Diego or LA).
Since you will be new to the area, the best approach might be to consider temprarily renting an apartment, while you find a more ideal rental property.
September 22, 2010 at 1:44 PM in reply to: Ok, Now that I’ve sold my home…I can’t find a decent rental now! #608772(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantI assume you are moving from a more expensive/urban region (e.g. San Diego or LA).
Since you will be new to the area, the best approach might be to consider temprarily renting an apartment, while you find a more ideal rental property.
September 22, 2010 at 1:44 PM in reply to: Ok, Now that I’ve sold my home…I can’t find a decent rental now! #609089(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantI assume you are moving from a more expensive/urban region (e.g. San Diego or LA).
Since you will be new to the area, the best approach might be to consider temprarily renting an apartment, while you find a more ideal rental property.
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantMaking strategic changes, based on careful tax planning is prudent.
Letting tax policy drive your investments is the tail wagging the dog.
Making drastic changes based on potential future changes (real or imagined) is futile.
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantMaking strategic changes, based on careful tax planning is prudent.
Letting tax policy drive your investments is the tail wagging the dog.
Making drastic changes based on potential future changes (real or imagined) is futile.
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantMaking strategic changes, based on careful tax planning is prudent.
Letting tax policy drive your investments is the tail wagging the dog.
Making drastic changes based on potential future changes (real or imagined) is futile.
-
AuthorPosts
