Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
felix
ParticipantAnd Obama is the guy who based an entire speech on the French national motto, Liberté, égalité, fraternité and couldn’t remember the line without a teleprompter. That had some in his European audience recently laughing at him and prompting French President Sarkozy to question not only Obama’s intelligence but that of the American people who voted for him.
So much for the world-wide respect Obama was supposed to get us.
There are so many Obama gaffes they are had to choose from but how about saying he visited 57 states. As dumb as some may think W was I think he knows how many states we have. Even most Jay(Leno) Walk All stars can tell you there are 50 states.
And you are making something about not knowing the difference between Shia and Sunni?
felix
ParticipantAnd Obama is the guy who based an entire speech on the French national motto, Liberté, égalité, fraternité and couldn’t remember the line without a teleprompter. That had some in his European audience recently laughing at him and prompting French President Sarkozy to question not only Obama’s intelligence but that of the American people who voted for him.
So much for the world-wide respect Obama was supposed to get us.
There are so many Obama gaffes they are had to choose from but how about saying he visited 57 states. As dumb as some may think W was I think he knows how many states we have. Even most Jay(Leno) Walk All stars can tell you there are 50 states.
And you are making something about not knowing the difference between Shia and Sunni?
felix
ParticipantAnd Obama is the guy who based an entire speech on the French national motto, Liberté, égalité, fraternité and couldn’t remember the line without a teleprompter. That had some in his European audience recently laughing at him and prompting French President Sarkozy to question not only Obama’s intelligence but that of the American people who voted for him.
So much for the world-wide respect Obama was supposed to get us.
There are so many Obama gaffes they are had to choose from but how about saying he visited 57 states. As dumb as some may think W was I think he knows how many states we have. Even most Jay(Leno) Walk All stars can tell you there are 50 states.
And you are making something about not knowing the difference between Shia and Sunni?
felix
ParticipantAnd Obama is the guy who based an entire speech on the French national motto, Liberté, égalité, fraternité and couldn’t remember the line without a teleprompter. That had some in his European audience recently laughing at him and prompting French President Sarkozy to question not only Obama’s intelligence but that of the American people who voted for him.
So much for the world-wide respect Obama was supposed to get us.
There are so many Obama gaffes they are had to choose from but how about saying he visited 57 states. As dumb as some may think W was I think he knows how many states we have. Even most Jay(Leno) Walk All stars can tell you there are 50 states.
And you are making something about not knowing the difference between Shia and Sunni?
June 11, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: Pivotal Day in US History Supreme Court says FU to Contract Law #413727felix
ParticipantI’m not sure whose side to be on in this fight. There seems to be conflicting issues involved.
On the one hand it would seem that precedent was on the bondholders side given that historically bondholders are at the top of the list when paying creditors. However, the government just pumped a sizable amount of cash into Chrysler. So if the bondholders were to be benefactors/recipients of tax payer largess then that would muddy the waters a bit for me.
Perhaps someone can explain.
June 11, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: Pivotal Day in US History Supreme Court says FU to Contract Law #413966felix
ParticipantI’m not sure whose side to be on in this fight. There seems to be conflicting issues involved.
On the one hand it would seem that precedent was on the bondholders side given that historically bondholders are at the top of the list when paying creditors. However, the government just pumped a sizable amount of cash into Chrysler. So if the bondholders were to be benefactors/recipients of tax payer largess then that would muddy the waters a bit for me.
Perhaps someone can explain.
June 11, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: Pivotal Day in US History Supreme Court says FU to Contract Law #414216felix
ParticipantI’m not sure whose side to be on in this fight. There seems to be conflicting issues involved.
On the one hand it would seem that precedent was on the bondholders side given that historically bondholders are at the top of the list when paying creditors. However, the government just pumped a sizable amount of cash into Chrysler. So if the bondholders were to be benefactors/recipients of tax payer largess then that would muddy the waters a bit for me.
Perhaps someone can explain.
June 11, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: Pivotal Day in US History Supreme Court says FU to Contract Law #414285felix
ParticipantI’m not sure whose side to be on in this fight. There seems to be conflicting issues involved.
On the one hand it would seem that precedent was on the bondholders side given that historically bondholders are at the top of the list when paying creditors. However, the government just pumped a sizable amount of cash into Chrysler. So if the bondholders were to be benefactors/recipients of tax payer largess then that would muddy the waters a bit for me.
Perhaps someone can explain.
June 11, 2009 at 6:53 AM in reply to: Pivotal Day in US History Supreme Court says FU to Contract Law #414438felix
ParticipantI’m not sure whose side to be on in this fight. There seems to be conflicting issues involved.
On the one hand it would seem that precedent was on the bondholders side given that historically bondholders are at the top of the list when paying creditors. However, the government just pumped a sizable amount of cash into Chrysler. So if the bondholders were to be benefactors/recipients of tax payer largess then that would muddy the waters a bit for me.
Perhaps someone can explain.
felix
ParticipantI also got a home warranty when I purchased. However, mine was with First American Home Buyers. I am very happy I did.
The house was over 20 years old when I bought it and it had much of the original equipment. We purchased it as a remodel project. I knew we’d have to soon replace some things in the home.
I did have issues both electrical and plumbing. Also I needed to replace the ovens, the heating/AC units and water heater. Getting all that done for ~$500/for the year plus some fees and the $50 for the visits was a great deal.
It has more than paid for itself.
felix
ParticipantI also got a home warranty when I purchased. However, mine was with First American Home Buyers. I am very happy I did.
The house was over 20 years old when I bought it and it had much of the original equipment. We purchased it as a remodel project. I knew we’d have to soon replace some things in the home.
I did have issues both electrical and plumbing. Also I needed to replace the ovens, the heating/AC units and water heater. Getting all that done for ~$500/for the year plus some fees and the $50 for the visits was a great deal.
It has more than paid for itself.
felix
ParticipantI also got a home warranty when I purchased. However, mine was with First American Home Buyers. I am very happy I did.
The house was over 20 years old when I bought it and it had much of the original equipment. We purchased it as a remodel project. I knew we’d have to soon replace some things in the home.
I did have issues both electrical and plumbing. Also I needed to replace the ovens, the heating/AC units and water heater. Getting all that done for ~$500/for the year plus some fees and the $50 for the visits was a great deal.
It has more than paid for itself.
felix
ParticipantI also got a home warranty when I purchased. However, mine was with First American Home Buyers. I am very happy I did.
The house was over 20 years old when I bought it and it had much of the original equipment. We purchased it as a remodel project. I knew we’d have to soon replace some things in the home.
I did have issues both electrical and plumbing. Also I needed to replace the ovens, the heating/AC units and water heater. Getting all that done for ~$500/for the year plus some fees and the $50 for the visits was a great deal.
It has more than paid for itself.
felix
ParticipantI also got a home warranty when I purchased. However, mine was with First American Home Buyers. I am very happy I did.
The house was over 20 years old when I bought it and it had much of the original equipment. We purchased it as a remodel project. I knew we’d have to soon replace some things in the home.
I did have issues both electrical and plumbing. Also I needed to replace the ovens, the heating/AC units and water heater. Getting all that done for ~$500/for the year plus some fees and the $50 for the visits was a great deal.
It has more than paid for itself.
-
AuthorPosts
