Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
EugeneParticipant
[quote=CognitiveDissonance]
Absolutely, they did! Actually today’s middle class uses more energy than kings of old. The US could get by on our internal allotment, which is 1/3 the amount, though, it would change the landscape, tremendously. You also have distribution issues with the top of the social strata trying to keep their allotment the same. Europe’s per capita is half of what American’s is today.[/quote]Is our internal allotment affected at all by widespread introduction of solar panels?
EugeneParticipant[quote=CognitiveDissonance]
Absolutely, they did! Actually today’s middle class uses more energy than kings of old. The US could get by on our internal allotment, which is 1/3 the amount, though, it would change the landscape, tremendously. You also have distribution issues with the top of the social strata trying to keep their allotment the same. Europe’s per capita is half of what American’s is today.[/quote]Is our internal allotment affected at all by widespread introduction of solar panels?
EugeneParticipant[quote=CognitiveDissonance]
Absolutely, they did! Actually today’s middle class uses more energy than kings of old. The US could get by on our internal allotment, which is 1/3 the amount, though, it would change the landscape, tremendously. You also have distribution issues with the top of the social strata trying to keep their allotment the same. Europe’s per capita is half of what American’s is today.[/quote]Is our internal allotment affected at all by widespread introduction of solar panels?
EugeneParticipant[quote=CognitiveDissonance]
Absolutely, they did! Actually today’s middle class uses more energy than kings of old. The US could get by on our internal allotment, which is 1/3 the amount, though, it would change the landscape, tremendously. You also have distribution issues with the top of the social strata trying to keep their allotment the same. Europe’s per capita is half of what American’s is today.[/quote]Is our internal allotment affected at all by widespread introduction of solar panels?
June 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #703161EugeneParticipantGiven the most recent developments, and the fact that Pawlenty’s federal budget perspective is as illogical and absurd as anything I might expect from the Tea Party (and, therefore, that he has no real advantage over a real Tea Party candidate), I feel reasonably comfortable forecasting that the GOP primary will be won (or, at least, strongly challenged) by either a Bachmann/Huckabee, or, somewhat less likely, a Palin/Huckabee ticket.
June 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #703258EugeneParticipantGiven the most recent developments, and the fact that Pawlenty’s federal budget perspective is as illogical and absurd as anything I might expect from the Tea Party (and, therefore, that he has no real advantage over a real Tea Party candidate), I feel reasonably comfortable forecasting that the GOP primary will be won (or, at least, strongly challenged) by either a Bachmann/Huckabee, or, somewhat less likely, a Palin/Huckabee ticket.
June 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #703848EugeneParticipantGiven the most recent developments, and the fact that Pawlenty’s federal budget perspective is as illogical and absurd as anything I might expect from the Tea Party (and, therefore, that he has no real advantage over a real Tea Party candidate), I feel reasonably comfortable forecasting that the GOP primary will be won (or, at least, strongly challenged) by either a Bachmann/Huckabee, or, somewhat less likely, a Palin/Huckabee ticket.
June 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #703996EugeneParticipantGiven the most recent developments, and the fact that Pawlenty’s federal budget perspective is as illogical and absurd as anything I might expect from the Tea Party (and, therefore, that he has no real advantage over a real Tea Party candidate), I feel reasonably comfortable forecasting that the GOP primary will be won (or, at least, strongly challenged) by either a Bachmann/Huckabee, or, somewhat less likely, a Palin/Huckabee ticket.
June 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM in reply to: OT – Who will run for President on the Republican side? #704357EugeneParticipantGiven the most recent developments, and the fact that Pawlenty’s federal budget perspective is as illogical and absurd as anything I might expect from the Tea Party (and, therefore, that he has no real advantage over a real Tea Party candidate), I feel reasonably comfortable forecasting that the GOP primary will be won (or, at least, strongly challenged) by either a Bachmann/Huckabee, or, somewhat less likely, a Palin/Huckabee ticket.
EugeneParticipantNonsense. There’s no overshoot, we can feed 50 billion on this planet without breaking a sweat.
[quote]Now, what is even more interesting is juxtaposing the peak oil chart with the human population chart.[/quote]
Populations of Europe and North America got within 1/3 to 1/2 of current levels before oil even became an industrial commodity.
EugeneParticipantNonsense. There’s no overshoot, we can feed 50 billion on this planet without breaking a sweat.
[quote]Now, what is even more interesting is juxtaposing the peak oil chart with the human population chart.[/quote]
Populations of Europe and North America got within 1/3 to 1/2 of current levels before oil even became an industrial commodity.
EugeneParticipantNonsense. There’s no overshoot, we can feed 50 billion on this planet without breaking a sweat.
[quote]Now, what is even more interesting is juxtaposing the peak oil chart with the human population chart.[/quote]
Populations of Europe and North America got within 1/3 to 1/2 of current levels before oil even became an industrial commodity.
EugeneParticipantNonsense. There’s no overshoot, we can feed 50 billion on this planet without breaking a sweat.
[quote]Now, what is even more interesting is juxtaposing the peak oil chart with the human population chart.[/quote]
Populations of Europe and North America got within 1/3 to 1/2 of current levels before oil even became an industrial commodity.
EugeneParticipantNonsense. There’s no overshoot, we can feed 50 billion on this planet without breaking a sweat.
[quote]Now, what is even more interesting is juxtaposing the peak oil chart with the human population chart.[/quote]
Populations of Europe and North America got within 1/3 to 1/2 of current levels before oil even became an industrial commodity.
-
AuthorPosts