[DWCAP]

That one had fallen out of escrow earlier if I remember right, and they were pretty desperate to just get it outa here. 291k is cheaper than I expected. I kinda wonder if it wont be on the rental block in a week or two.

[DWCAP]

That one had fallen out of escrow earlier if I remember right, and they were pretty desperate to just get it outa here. 291k is cheaper than I expected. I kinda wonder if it wont be on the rental block in a week or two.

[DWCAP]

First off I think it was funny how they finally mentioned that the error rates on this is very high (10%). You never hear that kinda stuff if it is a ‘good’ (increasing) report. Just “SALES UP XXX%”

Second, what about the CA tax credit? I know the double dip time was in early may, sign in April, close in May or June. Some people must have missed the cut-off but still purchased anyways to get the CA credit, right? Does anyone think the numbers out of CA would have been even worse without it? Just askin, not tellin.

[DWCAP]

First off I think it was funny how they finally mentioned that the error rates on this is very high (10%). You never hear that kinda stuff if it is a ‘good’ (increasing) report. Just “SALES UP XXX%”

Second, what about the CA tax credit? I know the double dip time was in early may, sign in April, close in May or June. Some people must have missed the cut-off but still purchased anyways to get the CA credit, right? Does anyone think the numbers out of CA would have been even worse without it? Just askin, not tellin.

[DWCAP]

First off I think it was funny how they finally mentioned that the error rates on this is very high (10%). You never hear that kinda stuff if it is a ‘good’ (increasing) report. Just “SALES UP XXX%”

Second, what about the CA tax credit? I know the double dip time was in early may, sign in April, close in May or June. Some people must have missed the cut-off but still purchased anyways to get the CA credit, right? Does anyone think the numbers out of CA would have been even worse without it? Just askin, not tellin.

[DWCAP]

First off I think it was funny how they finally mentioned that the error rates on this is very high (10%). You never hear that kinda stuff if it is a ‘good’ (increasing) report. Just “SALES UP XXX%”

Second, what about the CA tax credit? I know the double dip time was in early may, sign in April, close in May or June. Some people must have missed the cut-off but still purchased anyways to get the CA credit, right? Does anyone think the numbers out of CA would have been even worse without it? Just askin, not tellin.

[DWCAP]

First off I think it was funny how they finally mentioned that the error rates on this is very high (10%). You never hear that kinda stuff if it is a ‘good’ (increasing) report. Just “SALES UP XXX%”

Second, what about the CA tax credit? I know the double dip time was in early may, sign in April, close in May or June. Some people must have missed the cut-off but still purchased anyways to get the CA credit, right? Does anyone think the numbers out of CA would have been even worse without it? Just askin, not tellin.

[DWCAP]

Gender segregated classes may be a good idea for young children, but I wouldnt want it after the 8th grade except in a few cases, and the 10th grade in any way. Men and women need to be able to communicate with each other and be able to work together without fighting or f…..g.
I know it is sad to say, but I knew a bunch of people my freshman year in college who had no real interaction with the oposite sex previously. They had alot of problems interacting productivly. I know only a few now, mostly girls who went to all girls schools, and they also have the same problems.

And yes, little boys do need to run around and play. They NEED IT. I was a little boy once, and I remember the days when it rained and we couldnt go outside at school. As soon as that bell rang we were knee deep in the mud, cause they couldnt stop us anymore.

[DWCAP]

Gender segregated classes may be a good idea for young children, but I wouldnt want it after the 8th grade except in a few cases, and the 10th grade in any way. Men and women need to be able to communicate with each other and be able to work together without fighting or f…..g.
I know it is sad to say, but I knew a bunch of people my freshman year in college who had no real interaction with the oposite sex previously. They had alot of problems interacting productivly. I know only a few now, mostly girls who went to all girls schools, and they also have the same problems.

And yes, little boys do need to run around and play. They NEED IT. I was a little boy once, and I remember the days when it rained and we couldnt go outside at school. As soon as that bell rang we were knee deep in the mud, cause they couldnt stop us anymore.

[DWCAP]

Gender segregated classes may be a good idea for young children, but I wouldnt want it after the 8th grade except in a few cases, and the 10th grade in any way. Men and women need to be able to communicate with each other and be able to work together without fighting or f…..g.
I know it is sad to say, but I knew a bunch of people my freshman year in college who had no real interaction with the oposite sex previously. They had alot of problems interacting productivly. I know only a few now, mostly girls who went to all girls schools, and they also have the same problems.

And yes, little boys do need to run around and play. They NEED IT. I was a little boy once, and I remember the days when it rained and we couldnt go outside at school. As soon as that bell rang we were knee deep in the mud, cause they couldnt stop us anymore.

[DWCAP]

Gender segregated classes may be a good idea for young children, but I wouldnt want it after the 8th grade except in a few cases, and the 10th grade in any way. Men and women need to be able to communicate with each other and be able to work together without fighting or f…..g.
I know it is sad to say, but I knew a bunch of people my freshman year in college who had no real interaction with the oposite sex previously. They had alot of problems interacting productivly. I know only a few now, mostly girls who went to all girls schools, and they also have the same problems.

And yes, little boys do need to run around and play. They NEED IT. I was a little boy once, and I remember the days when it rained and we couldnt go outside at school. As soon as that bell rang we were knee deep in the mud, cause they couldnt stop us anymore.

[DWCAP]

Gender segregated classes may be a good idea for young children, but I wouldnt want it after the 8th grade except in a few cases, and the 10th grade in any way. Men and women need to be able to communicate with each other and be able to work together without fighting or f…..g.
I know it is sad to say, but I knew a bunch of people my freshman year in college who had no real interaction with the oposite sex previously. They had alot of problems interacting productivly. I know only a few now, mostly girls who went to all girls schools, and they also have the same problems.

And yes, little boys do need to run around and play. They NEED IT. I was a little boy once, and I remember the days when it rained and we couldnt go outside at school. As soon as that bell rang we were knee deep in the mud, cause they couldnt stop us anymore.

[DWCAP]

[quote=Eugene]Jp: those are all good arguments, but they are long term arguments, they don’t explain why we should be financially austere NOW NOW NOW as opposed to when unemployment comes down a bit from 10%.
xbox: this is not an ideological question, it’s fundamental macro economics: what happens if we cut govt spending and what happens if we don’t. It seems to me that Krugman’s position is much better defended with numbers.[/quote]

What about my post? Does that make an argument to why we cant be financially austere right now? (basically the ‘short term gain for long term pain’ argument.)
If not, then how do we force an economy tooled for government financed expansion back into a private expansion economy without going back into recession?

[DWCAP]

[quote=Eugene]Jp: those are all good arguments, but they are long term arguments, they don’t explain why we should be financially austere NOW NOW NOW as opposed to when unemployment comes down a bit from 10%.
xbox: this is not an ideological question, it’s fundamental macro economics: what happens if we cut govt spending and what happens if we don’t. It seems to me that Krugman’s position is much better defended with numbers.[/quote]

What about my post? Does that make an argument to why we cant be financially austere right now? (basically the ‘short term gain for long term pain’ argument.)
If not, then how do we force an economy tooled for government financed expansion back into a private expansion economy without going back into recession?

[DWCAP]

[quote=Eugene]Jp: those are all good arguments, but they are long term arguments, they don’t explain why we should be financially austere NOW NOW NOW as opposed to when unemployment comes down a bit from 10%.
xbox: this is not an ideological question, it’s fundamental macro economics: what happens if we cut govt spending and what happens if we don’t. It seems to me that Krugman’s position is much better defended with numbers.[/quote]

What about my post? Does that make an argument to why we cant be financially austere right now? (basically the ‘short term gain for long term pain’ argument.)
If not, then how do we force an economy tooled for government financed expansion back into a private expansion economy without going back into recession?

[Author]

Posts