Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
drunkle
Participant“Although I’m sure there are other zip codes that are also considered distressed, I’m not being asked to put down at least 15% in the other neighborhoods I’m considering – just North Park.”
i should have been more clear, i didn’t mean the lender had anything against you, rather, they didn’t like the house. ie., they don’t want to loan you the money to buy that house in north park. eg., they think the house is a high risk for depreciation. that is, the house will potentially lose some 15% value (at least), thereby necessitating the big dp. for example, if you bought the house with their money and got foreclosed on, they would be eating a loss if they didn’t have your dp. id est, they don’t want to buy the house. that is to say, they don’t want to loan you the money to buy the house since they’ll be on the hook for it. exempli gratia, you wouldn’t loan your 16 year old kid money to buy an 86 chevy camaro because of reliability, insurance and plain good sense, but that doesn’t mean you won’t help him buy a car at all. you know?
October 29, 2007 at 7:01 PM in reply to: New Contest – Best example of chasing the market down #93051drunkle
Participantoffer them (in non binding terms) 989k. see if they raise their price to 1 mil…
October 29, 2007 at 7:01 PM in reply to: New Contest – Best example of chasing the market down #93085drunkle
Participantoffer them (in non binding terms) 989k. see if they raise their price to 1 mil…
October 29, 2007 at 7:01 PM in reply to: New Contest – Best example of chasing the market down #93097drunkle
Participantoffer them (in non binding terms) 989k. see if they raise their price to 1 mil…
drunkle
Participantthat’s funny. at current “valuations”, 15% down is a veritable fortune. in the ghetto. for shitboxes (mexican prisons, adobe blocks with all the bars on the windows).
to be blunt, that lender just doesn’t want to loan you the money. which is fine, drive the market back down to reality.
drunkle
Participantthat’s funny. at current “valuations”, 15% down is a veritable fortune. in the ghetto. for shitboxes (mexican prisons, adobe blocks with all the bars on the windows).
to be blunt, that lender just doesn’t want to loan you the money. which is fine, drive the market back down to reality.
drunkle
Participantthat’s funny. at current “valuations”, 15% down is a veritable fortune. in the ghetto. for shitboxes (mexican prisons, adobe blocks with all the bars on the windows).
to be blunt, that lender just doesn’t want to loan you the money. which is fine, drive the market back down to reality.
drunkle
Participantexposing the auctions with actual proof could have interesting effects…
drunkle
Participantexposing the auctions with actual proof could have interesting effects…
drunkle
Participantexposing the auctions with actual proof could have interesting effects…
drunkle
Participantspeaking of which, doesn’t the guy from merrill lynch bear a striking resemblence? maybe they share the same ‘tanning’ secrets?
drunkle
Participantspeaking of which, doesn’t the guy from merrill lynch bear a striking resemblence? maybe they share the same ‘tanning’ secrets?
drunkle
Participantspeaking of which, doesn’t the guy from merrill lynch bear a striking resemblence? maybe they share the same ‘tanning’ secrets?
drunkle
Participantkewp, you make it sound like a fortune cookie.
cfc reported a loss of twice the ‘estimates’. what does that mean? does it mean the company is in good shape?
hell no. the stock is being gamed. stocks in general are gamed. forgetaboutit.
-
AuthorPosts
