Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 26, 2009 at 10:06 AM in reply to: How do lenders deal with houses with un-permitted additions #373754March 26, 2009 at 10:06 AM in reply to: How do lenders deal with houses with un-permitted additions #373871
drboom
Participant[quote=AN]HLS, what’s happening on May 1st?[/quote]
The NY Times has a writeup here.
Participant[quote=jpinpb]Did stocks go up when we had the very first 750 bailout?[/quote]
Circumstances were a little different, to put it mildly.
[quote]Give it some time. I don’t think this will do much. Like was said, unless the lax lending return and the strawberry pickers and lemonade stand owners can buy McMansions, the descent will continue and/or stagnation.
[/quote]… and the gubmint (aka Fannie & Freddie) will do everything it can to help those fine, deserving citrus beverage entrepreneurs keep their McMansions.
Rinse, repeat.
Participant[quote=jpinpb]Did stocks go up when we had the very first 750 bailout?[/quote]
Circumstances were a little different, to put it mildly.
[quote]Give it some time. I don’t think this will do much. Like was said, unless the lax lending return and the strawberry pickers and lemonade stand owners can buy McMansions, the descent will continue and/or stagnation.
[/quote]… and the gubmint (aka Fannie & Freddie) will do everything it can to help those fine, deserving citrus beverage entrepreneurs keep their McMansions.
Rinse, repeat.
Participant[quote=jpinpb]Did stocks go up when we had the very first 750 bailout?[/quote]
Circumstances were a little different, to put it mildly.
[quote]Give it some time. I don’t think this will do much. Like was said, unless the lax lending return and the strawberry pickers and lemonade stand owners can buy McMansions, the descent will continue and/or stagnation.
[/quote]… and the gubmint (aka Fannie & Freddie) will do everything it can to help those fine, deserving citrus beverage entrepreneurs keep their McMansions.
Rinse, repeat.
Participant[quote=jpinpb]Did stocks go up when we had the very first 750 bailout?[/quote]
Circumstances were a little different, to put it mildly.
[quote]Give it some time. I don’t think this will do much. Like was said, unless the lax lending return and the strawberry pickers and lemonade stand owners can buy McMansions, the descent will continue and/or stagnation.
[/quote]… and the gubmint (aka Fannie & Freddie) will do everything it can to help those fine, deserving citrus beverage entrepreneurs keep their McMansions.
Rinse, repeat.
Participant[quote=jpinpb]Did stocks go up when we had the very first 750 bailout?[/quote]
Circumstances were a little different, to put it mildly.
[quote]Give it some time. I don’t think this will do much. Like was said, unless the lax lending return and the strawberry pickers and lemonade stand owners can buy McMansions, the descent will continue and/or stagnation.
[/quote]… and the gubmint (aka Fannie & Freddie) will do everything it can to help those fine, deserving citrus beverage entrepreneurs keep their McMansions.
Rinse, repeat.
ParticipantAsk yourself one simple question: would the stock market have gone up 7% today if this was anything but a terrible deal for the taxpayer and a victory for the banksters?
We’ll pay dearly for this.
ParticipantAsk yourself one simple question: would the stock market have gone up 7% today if this was anything but a terrible deal for the taxpayer and a victory for the banksters?
We’ll pay dearly for this.
ParticipantAsk yourself one simple question: would the stock market have gone up 7% today if this was anything but a terrible deal for the taxpayer and a victory for the banksters?
We’ll pay dearly for this.
ParticipantAsk yourself one simple question: would the stock market have gone up 7% today if this was anything but a terrible deal for the taxpayer and a victory for the banksters?
We’ll pay dearly for this.
ParticipantAsk yourself one simple question: would the stock market have gone up 7% today if this was anything but a terrible deal for the taxpayer and a victory for the banksters?
We’ll pay dearly for this.
March 18, 2009 at 5:48 AM in reply to: I believe Home Prices (Most Places in San Diego) reached bottom or almost bottom #368820ParticipantDidn’t Rich tell us to expect something like this?
A rise in the DataQuack(tm) headline median could be a sign that the high end is starting to capitulate. This would drive up volume in that category and shift the overall median higher.
It will be interesting to see what the Case-Shiller report for February looks like.
March 18, 2009 at 5:48 AM in reply to: I believe Home Prices (Most Places in San Diego) reached bottom or almost bottom #368985ParticipantDidn’t Rich tell us to expect something like this?
A rise in the DataQuack(tm) headline median could be a sign that the high end is starting to capitulate. This would drive up volume in that category and shift the overall median higher.
It will be interesting to see what the Case-Shiller report for February looks like.
March 18, 2009 at 5:48 AM in reply to: I believe Home Prices (Most Places in San Diego) reached bottom or almost bottom #369024ParticipantDidn’t Rich tell us to expect something like this?
A rise in the DataQuack(tm) headline median could be a sign that the high end is starting to capitulate. This would drive up volume in that category and shift the overall median higher.
It will be interesting to see what the Case-Shiller report for February looks like.
-
AuthorPosts
