Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 4, 2008 at 12:48 PM in reply to: Off Topic Here is a test that tests your “political compass” #298802November 2, 2008 at 9:42 PM in reply to: OT: what do you folks use to prevent losing your docs/pictures/videos on your computer? #297092
Doofrat
ParticipantWhatever you decide is best, remember to always have a copy off site!
November 2, 2008 at 9:42 PM in reply to: OT: what do you folks use to prevent losing your docs/pictures/videos on your computer? #297435ParticipantWhatever you decide is best, remember to always have a copy off site!
November 2, 2008 at 9:42 PM in reply to: OT: what do you folks use to prevent losing your docs/pictures/videos on your computer? #297451ParticipantWhatever you decide is best, remember to always have a copy off site!
November 2, 2008 at 9:42 PM in reply to: OT: what do you folks use to prevent losing your docs/pictures/videos on your computer? #297464ParticipantWhatever you decide is best, remember to always have a copy off site!
November 2, 2008 at 9:42 PM in reply to: OT: what do you folks use to prevent losing your docs/pictures/videos on your computer? #297509ParticipantWhatever you decide is best, remember to always have a copy off site!
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
ParticipantLooks like the exuberance isn’t there anymore.
October 14, 2008 at 5:06 PM in reply to: National City – 85% of kids on Free and Reduced Lunch #287284ParticipantIt’s the lack of analysis like what you did for National City that got everybody into this mess. It’s called a reality check. The consumers were using pop phrases like “can’t lose money in Real Estate” or “They’re not making any more land” in the place of any real analysis and the banks were using data that was flawed from the start and not doing a reality check on who they were loaning money to.
The only catch to the National City prices is that it’s likely that somebody with $35,000 under their mattress would buy when the rental ratio became reasonable and then use the property as a rental. Who knows what that would be?
October 14, 2008 at 5:06 PM in reply to: National City – 85% of kids on Free and Reduced Lunch #287583ParticipantIt’s the lack of analysis like what you did for National City that got everybody into this mess. It’s called a reality check. The consumers were using pop phrases like “can’t lose money in Real Estate” or “They’re not making any more land” in the place of any real analysis and the banks were using data that was flawed from the start and not doing a reality check on who they were loaning money to.
The only catch to the National City prices is that it’s likely that somebody with $35,000 under their mattress would buy when the rental ratio became reasonable and then use the property as a rental. Who knows what that would be?
October 14, 2008 at 5:06 PM in reply to: National City – 85% of kids on Free and Reduced Lunch #287600ParticipantIt’s the lack of analysis like what you did for National City that got everybody into this mess. It’s called a reality check. The consumers were using pop phrases like “can’t lose money in Real Estate” or “They’re not making any more land” in the place of any real analysis and the banks were using data that was flawed from the start and not doing a reality check on who they were loaning money to.
The only catch to the National City prices is that it’s likely that somebody with $35,000 under their mattress would buy when the rental ratio became reasonable and then use the property as a rental. Who knows what that would be?
October 14, 2008 at 5:06 PM in reply to: National City – 85% of kids on Free and Reduced Lunch #287627ParticipantIt’s the lack of analysis like what you did for National City that got everybody into this mess. It’s called a reality check. The consumers were using pop phrases like “can’t lose money in Real Estate” or “They’re not making any more land” in the place of any real analysis and the banks were using data that was flawed from the start and not doing a reality check on who they were loaning money to.
The only catch to the National City prices is that it’s likely that somebody with $35,000 under their mattress would buy when the rental ratio became reasonable and then use the property as a rental. Who knows what that would be?
-
AuthorPosts
