Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 15, 2007 at 9:33 PM in reply to: By spot to live that isn’t more than 20 minutes from downtown… #118378December 15, 2007 at 5:33 PM in reply to: By spot to live that isn’t more than 20 minutes from downtown… #118036
DCRogers
ParticipantJumby,
Please tell me that this entire discussion wasn’t just a setup so the “Del Cerro” ad could be posted… I seem to recall an irritating thread earlier this month (complete with phony “postings”) that was just an excuse for advertising this same property.
So, are you for real?
December 15, 2007 at 5:33 PM in reply to: By spot to live that isn’t more than 20 minutes from downtown… #118169ParticipantJumby,
Please tell me that this entire discussion wasn’t just a setup so the “Del Cerro” ad could be posted… I seem to recall an irritating thread earlier this month (complete with phony “postings”) that was just an excuse for advertising this same property.
So, are you for real?
December 15, 2007 at 5:33 PM in reply to: By spot to live that isn’t more than 20 minutes from downtown… #118205ParticipantJumby,
Please tell me that this entire discussion wasn’t just a setup so the “Del Cerro” ad could be posted… I seem to recall an irritating thread earlier this month (complete with phony “postings”) that was just an excuse for advertising this same property.
So, are you for real?
December 15, 2007 at 5:33 PM in reply to: By spot to live that isn’t more than 20 minutes from downtown… #118244ParticipantJumby,
Please tell me that this entire discussion wasn’t just a setup so the “Del Cerro” ad could be posted… I seem to recall an irritating thread earlier this month (complete with phony “postings”) that was just an excuse for advertising this same property.
So, are you for real?
December 15, 2007 at 5:33 PM in reply to: By spot to live that isn’t more than 20 minutes from downtown… #118265ParticipantJumby,
Please tell me that this entire discussion wasn’t just a setup so the “Del Cerro” ad could be posted… I seem to recall an irritating thread earlier this month (complete with phony “postings”) that was just an excuse for advertising this same property.
So, are you for real?
Participantcooperthedog,
Thanks for all the work it took to “do the math”. It’s nice to see arguments backed up with data on this thread… it’s contained lots of conflicting information and opinions, and given the importance of this issue for people’s eventual security, I am glad to have your serious, and lengthy, study!
Participantcooperthedog,
Thanks for all the work it took to “do the math”. It’s nice to see arguments backed up with data on this thread… it’s contained lots of conflicting information and opinions, and given the importance of this issue for people’s eventual security, I am glad to have your serious, and lengthy, study!
Participantcooperthedog,
Thanks for all the work it took to “do the math”. It’s nice to see arguments backed up with data on this thread… it’s contained lots of conflicting information and opinions, and given the importance of this issue for people’s eventual security, I am glad to have your serious, and lengthy, study!
Participantcooperthedog,
Thanks for all the work it took to “do the math”. It’s nice to see arguments backed up with data on this thread… it’s contained lots of conflicting information and opinions, and given the importance of this issue for people’s eventual security, I am glad to have your serious, and lengthy, study!
Participantcooperthedog,
Thanks for all the work it took to “do the math”. It’s nice to see arguments backed up with data on this thread… it’s contained lots of conflicting information and opinions, and given the importance of this issue for people’s eventual security, I am glad to have your serious, and lengthy, study!
ParticipantOkay, someone answer me this: why was there an increase in price in the middle of the series of downward adjustments? “11/02/2007 from $2,450,000-$2,750,000 to $2,950,000”. Is it just so they can “reduce” it later? What gives?
ParticipantOkay, someone answer me this: why was there an increase in price in the middle of the series of downward adjustments? “11/02/2007 from $2,450,000-$2,750,000 to $2,950,000”. Is it just so they can “reduce” it later? What gives?
ParticipantOkay, someone answer me this: why was there an increase in price in the middle of the series of downward adjustments? “11/02/2007 from $2,450,000-$2,750,000 to $2,950,000”. Is it just so they can “reduce” it later? What gives?
ParticipantOkay, someone answer me this: why was there an increase in price in the middle of the series of downward adjustments? “11/02/2007 from $2,450,000-$2,750,000 to $2,950,000”. Is it just so they can “reduce” it later? What gives?
-
AuthorPosts
