Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
dbapig
Participant[quote=CBad]I find this part of the proposed bill especially scary:
immunization coverage[/quote]I’m especially scared at the prospect of losing health insurance if laid off.
Participant[quote=CBad]I find this part of the proposed bill especially scary:
immunization coverage[/quote]I’m especially scared at the prospect of losing health insurance if laid off.
Participant[quote=CBad]I find this part of the proposed bill especially scary:
immunization coverage[/quote]I’m especially scared at the prospect of losing health insurance if laid off.
Participant[quote=CBad]I find this part of the proposed bill especially scary:
immunization coverage[/quote]I’m especially scared at the prospect of losing health insurance if laid off.
Participant[quote=afx114]
Exactly my point. Isn’t the fact that the Dems are having trouble getting this thing through a good thing?[/quote]No it’s not. It’s bad because it shows just how POWERFUL special interests are in DC.
There was a editorial by Paul Krugman over at NYtimes.com pointing fingers at the Blue Dogs (conservative Dems).
You may or may not agree with Paul Krugman or the newspaper. But you should read it.
Basically insurance/pharms are pouring $$$ into the few Dems who are basically in control of the health bill debate. Hence what they are demanding don’t sound coherent.
Participant[quote=afx114]
Exactly my point. Isn’t the fact that the Dems are having trouble getting this thing through a good thing?[/quote]No it’s not. It’s bad because it shows just how POWERFUL special interests are in DC.
There was a editorial by Paul Krugman over at NYtimes.com pointing fingers at the Blue Dogs (conservative Dems).
You may or may not agree with Paul Krugman or the newspaper. But you should read it.
Basically insurance/pharms are pouring $$$ into the few Dems who are basically in control of the health bill debate. Hence what they are demanding don’t sound coherent.
Participant[quote=afx114]
Exactly my point. Isn’t the fact that the Dems are having trouble getting this thing through a good thing?[/quote]No it’s not. It’s bad because it shows just how POWERFUL special interests are in DC.
There was a editorial by Paul Krugman over at NYtimes.com pointing fingers at the Blue Dogs (conservative Dems).
You may or may not agree with Paul Krugman or the newspaper. But you should read it.
Basically insurance/pharms are pouring $$$ into the few Dems who are basically in control of the health bill debate. Hence what they are demanding don’t sound coherent.
Participant[quote=afx114]
Exactly my point. Isn’t the fact that the Dems are having trouble getting this thing through a good thing?[/quote]No it’s not. It’s bad because it shows just how POWERFUL special interests are in DC.
There was a editorial by Paul Krugman over at NYtimes.com pointing fingers at the Blue Dogs (conservative Dems).
You may or may not agree with Paul Krugman or the newspaper. But you should read it.
Basically insurance/pharms are pouring $$$ into the few Dems who are basically in control of the health bill debate. Hence what they are demanding don’t sound coherent.
Participant[quote=afx114]
Exactly my point. Isn’t the fact that the Dems are having trouble getting this thing through a good thing?[/quote]No it’s not. It’s bad because it shows just how POWERFUL special interests are in DC.
There was a editorial by Paul Krugman over at NYtimes.com pointing fingers at the Blue Dogs (conservative Dems).
You may or may not agree with Paul Krugman or the newspaper. But you should read it.
Basically insurance/pharms are pouring $$$ into the few Dems who are basically in control of the health bill debate. Hence what they are demanding don’t sound coherent.
Participant[quote=desmond]Here’s a quote from the article:
“Maybe some of my friends will be able to live there instead of having to go to Tijuana or Temecula,” he said.
What a low blow to Tijuana.[/quote]
Don’t mean to be disrespectful but I think that’s a complement to Tijuana, imho.
Participant[quote=desmond]Here’s a quote from the article:
“Maybe some of my friends will be able to live there instead of having to go to Tijuana or Temecula,” he said.
What a low blow to Tijuana.[/quote]
Don’t mean to be disrespectful but I think that’s a complement to Tijuana, imho.
Participant[quote=desmond]Here’s a quote from the article:
“Maybe some of my friends will be able to live there instead of having to go to Tijuana or Temecula,” he said.
What a low blow to Tijuana.[/quote]
Don’t mean to be disrespectful but I think that’s a complement to Tijuana, imho.
Participant[quote=desmond]Here’s a quote from the article:
“Maybe some of my friends will be able to live there instead of having to go to Tijuana or Temecula,” he said.
What a low blow to Tijuana.[/quote]
Don’t mean to be disrespectful but I think that’s a complement to Tijuana, imho.
Participant[quote=desmond]Here’s a quote from the article:
“Maybe some of my friends will be able to live there instead of having to go to Tijuana or Temecula,” he said.
What a low blow to Tijuana.[/quote]
Don’t mean to be disrespectful but I think that’s a complement to Tijuana, imho.
-
AuthorPosts
