Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
dbapig
Participant[quote=CONCHO]
I think we will see a lot more people from border areas heading to Mexico for treatment and abandoning US health insurance altogether. Of course if that happens they’ll make doing so illegal I’m sure.[/quote]I really doubt enough will really go across the border and abandon US health insurance. Many may, but will enough? Doubt it.
dbapig
Participant[quote=CONCHO]
I think we will see a lot more people from border areas heading to Mexico for treatment and abandoning US health insurance altogether. Of course if that happens they’ll make doing so illegal I’m sure.[/quote]I really doubt enough will really go across the border and abandon US health insurance. Many may, but will enough? Doubt it.
dbapig
Participant[quote=CONCHO]
I think we will see a lot more people from border areas heading to Mexico for treatment and abandoning US health insurance altogether. Of course if that happens they’ll make doing so illegal I’m sure.[/quote]I really doubt enough will really go across the border and abandon US health insurance. Many may, but will enough? Doubt it.
dbapig
Participant[quote=CONCHO]
I think we will see a lot more people from border areas heading to Mexico for treatment and abandoning US health insurance altogether. Of course if that happens they’ll make doing so illegal I’m sure.[/quote]I really doubt enough will really go across the border and abandon US health insurance. Many may, but will enough? Doubt it.
dbapig
Participant[quote=DWCAP][quote=dbapig][quote=DWCAP][quote=afx114]…………..
So, yes, I am happy.[/quote]And where do you think all the money to pay for all this is coming from? Your family doesnt have the money to cover the costs associated with the health care they demand. Few persons have that money, so most pool their money with their co-worker and their company and get it that way. Your family doesnt have that option apparently, so they need a subsidy from someone else, or they dont get it. Simple as that. Nothing is free in this world, and you are happy because the government has decided to transfer weath from others to pay for your familys needs. Not suprising, most people would feel the same way. But dont be supprised when others are frustrated at the reduction in their quality of life for your families health care expenses.[/quote]
Who’s you daddy? Is he Bill Gates? If so, than yeah, no need to worry about not having health insurance. But of course you are not. What’s the goal of having ‘insurance’? It exists because MOST people don’t have the means to be prepared for any surprises in life such as car accidents/fire/illness.
What the bill does is reform health insurance, not setting up a Universal Health care. No?
You talk about quality of life going down. I assure you for those who couldn’t get health insurance (about 30 million?) their quality of life is going way up. And it’s not just for those who don’t have health insurance now but others who have them but have to worry about losing it when they somehow lose their jobs. One (very important) less thing to feel insecure about. I’d say quality of life is going up.[/quote]
1. I was attempting to reply that the part of society that benifits most from this legeslation is the part that will pay little to nothing for this benifit.
…
2. But that should serve as a wakeup call to expain why it is important, not some angry ‘who’s your daddy’ detribes.
…
3. I am glad you so angrly agree with me.[/quote]1. Tax cuts benefit a few (rich) the most. It goes both ways.
2. I wasn’t trying to sound angry but funny. Sorry I failed. So let me rephrase it this way. Is Bill Gates your father?
3. Trust me, I am not angry. I am so happy. It could be better but still happy.
dbapig
Participant[quote=DWCAP][quote=dbapig][quote=DWCAP][quote=afx114]…………..
So, yes, I am happy.[/quote]And where do you think all the money to pay for all this is coming from? Your family doesnt have the money to cover the costs associated with the health care they demand. Few persons have that money, so most pool their money with their co-worker and their company and get it that way. Your family doesnt have that option apparently, so they need a subsidy from someone else, or they dont get it. Simple as that. Nothing is free in this world, and you are happy because the government has decided to transfer weath from others to pay for your familys needs. Not suprising, most people would feel the same way. But dont be supprised when others are frustrated at the reduction in their quality of life for your families health care expenses.[/quote]
Who’s you daddy? Is he Bill Gates? If so, than yeah, no need to worry about not having health insurance. But of course you are not. What’s the goal of having ‘insurance’? It exists because MOST people don’t have the means to be prepared for any surprises in life such as car accidents/fire/illness.
What the bill does is reform health insurance, not setting up a Universal Health care. No?
You talk about quality of life going down. I assure you for those who couldn’t get health insurance (about 30 million?) their quality of life is going way up. And it’s not just for those who don’t have health insurance now but others who have them but have to worry about losing it when they somehow lose their jobs. One (very important) less thing to feel insecure about. I’d say quality of life is going up.[/quote]
1. I was attempting to reply that the part of society that benifits most from this legeslation is the part that will pay little to nothing for this benifit.
…
2. But that should serve as a wakeup call to expain why it is important, not some angry ‘who’s your daddy’ detribes.
…
3. I am glad you so angrly agree with me.[/quote]1. Tax cuts benefit a few (rich) the most. It goes both ways.
2. I wasn’t trying to sound angry but funny. Sorry I failed. So let me rephrase it this way. Is Bill Gates your father?
3. Trust me, I am not angry. I am so happy. It could be better but still happy.
dbapig
Participant[quote=DWCAP][quote=dbapig][quote=DWCAP][quote=afx114]…………..
So, yes, I am happy.[/quote]And where do you think all the money to pay for all this is coming from? Your family doesnt have the money to cover the costs associated with the health care they demand. Few persons have that money, so most pool their money with their co-worker and their company and get it that way. Your family doesnt have that option apparently, so they need a subsidy from someone else, or they dont get it. Simple as that. Nothing is free in this world, and you are happy because the government has decided to transfer weath from others to pay for your familys needs. Not suprising, most people would feel the same way. But dont be supprised when others are frustrated at the reduction in their quality of life for your families health care expenses.[/quote]
Who’s you daddy? Is he Bill Gates? If so, than yeah, no need to worry about not having health insurance. But of course you are not. What’s the goal of having ‘insurance’? It exists because MOST people don’t have the means to be prepared for any surprises in life such as car accidents/fire/illness.
What the bill does is reform health insurance, not setting up a Universal Health care. No?
You talk about quality of life going down. I assure you for those who couldn’t get health insurance (about 30 million?) their quality of life is going way up. And it’s not just for those who don’t have health insurance now but others who have them but have to worry about losing it when they somehow lose their jobs. One (very important) less thing to feel insecure about. I’d say quality of life is going up.[/quote]
1. I was attempting to reply that the part of society that benifits most from this legeslation is the part that will pay little to nothing for this benifit.
…
2. But that should serve as a wakeup call to expain why it is important, not some angry ‘who’s your daddy’ detribes.
…
3. I am glad you so angrly agree with me.[/quote]1. Tax cuts benefit a few (rich) the most. It goes both ways.
2. I wasn’t trying to sound angry but funny. Sorry I failed. So let me rephrase it this way. Is Bill Gates your father?
3. Trust me, I am not angry. I am so happy. It could be better but still happy.
dbapig
Participant[quote=DWCAP][quote=dbapig][quote=DWCAP][quote=afx114]…………..
So, yes, I am happy.[/quote]And where do you think all the money to pay for all this is coming from? Your family doesnt have the money to cover the costs associated with the health care they demand. Few persons have that money, so most pool their money with their co-worker and their company and get it that way. Your family doesnt have that option apparently, so they need a subsidy from someone else, or they dont get it. Simple as that. Nothing is free in this world, and you are happy because the government has decided to transfer weath from others to pay for your familys needs. Not suprising, most people would feel the same way. But dont be supprised when others are frustrated at the reduction in their quality of life for your families health care expenses.[/quote]
Who’s you daddy? Is he Bill Gates? If so, than yeah, no need to worry about not having health insurance. But of course you are not. What’s the goal of having ‘insurance’? It exists because MOST people don’t have the means to be prepared for any surprises in life such as car accidents/fire/illness.
What the bill does is reform health insurance, not setting up a Universal Health care. No?
You talk about quality of life going down. I assure you for those who couldn’t get health insurance (about 30 million?) their quality of life is going way up. And it’s not just for those who don’t have health insurance now but others who have them but have to worry about losing it when they somehow lose their jobs. One (very important) less thing to feel insecure about. I’d say quality of life is going up.[/quote]
1. I was attempting to reply that the part of society that benifits most from this legeslation is the part that will pay little to nothing for this benifit.
…
2. But that should serve as a wakeup call to expain why it is important, not some angry ‘who’s your daddy’ detribes.
…
3. I am glad you so angrly agree with me.[/quote]1. Tax cuts benefit a few (rich) the most. It goes both ways.
2. I wasn’t trying to sound angry but funny. Sorry I failed. So let me rephrase it this way. Is Bill Gates your father?
3. Trust me, I am not angry. I am so happy. It could be better but still happy.
dbapig
Participant[quote=DWCAP][quote=dbapig][quote=DWCAP][quote=afx114]…………..
So, yes, I am happy.[/quote]And where do you think all the money to pay for all this is coming from? Your family doesnt have the money to cover the costs associated with the health care they demand. Few persons have that money, so most pool their money with their co-worker and their company and get it that way. Your family doesnt have that option apparently, so they need a subsidy from someone else, or they dont get it. Simple as that. Nothing is free in this world, and you are happy because the government has decided to transfer weath from others to pay for your familys needs. Not suprising, most people would feel the same way. But dont be supprised when others are frustrated at the reduction in their quality of life for your families health care expenses.[/quote]
Who’s you daddy? Is he Bill Gates? If so, than yeah, no need to worry about not having health insurance. But of course you are not. What’s the goal of having ‘insurance’? It exists because MOST people don’t have the means to be prepared for any surprises in life such as car accidents/fire/illness.
What the bill does is reform health insurance, not setting up a Universal Health care. No?
You talk about quality of life going down. I assure you for those who couldn’t get health insurance (about 30 million?) their quality of life is going way up. And it’s not just for those who don’t have health insurance now but others who have them but have to worry about losing it when they somehow lose their jobs. One (very important) less thing to feel insecure about. I’d say quality of life is going up.[/quote]
1. I was attempting to reply that the part of society that benifits most from this legeslation is the part that will pay little to nothing for this benifit.
…
2. But that should serve as a wakeup call to expain why it is important, not some angry ‘who’s your daddy’ detribes.
…
3. I am glad you so angrly agree with me.[/quote]1. Tax cuts benefit a few (rich) the most. It goes both ways.
2. I wasn’t trying to sound angry but funny. Sorry I failed. So let me rephrase it this way. Is Bill Gates your father?
3. Trust me, I am not angry. I am so happy. It could be better but still happy.
dbapig
Participant[quote=SK in CV]
Like you, I’m pleased that it passed. But this is far from historic legislation. It is filled with ideas supported and proposed by every Republican president since Nixon. That certainly doesn’t make it bad, it’s simply less than historic. It is not a progressive bill. When insurance doesn’t cover all of women’s parts, it cannot be progressive. Hopefully, as you say, it is a step in the right direction.[/quote]So why did ALL of the GOP in congress oppose it?
dbapig
Participant[quote=SK in CV]
Like you, I’m pleased that it passed. But this is far from historic legislation. It is filled with ideas supported and proposed by every Republican president since Nixon. That certainly doesn’t make it bad, it’s simply less than historic. It is not a progressive bill. When insurance doesn’t cover all of women’s parts, it cannot be progressive. Hopefully, as you say, it is a step in the right direction.[/quote]So why did ALL of the GOP in congress oppose it?
dbapig
Participant[quote=SK in CV]
Like you, I’m pleased that it passed. But this is far from historic legislation. It is filled with ideas supported and proposed by every Republican president since Nixon. That certainly doesn’t make it bad, it’s simply less than historic. It is not a progressive bill. When insurance doesn’t cover all of women’s parts, it cannot be progressive. Hopefully, as you say, it is a step in the right direction.[/quote]So why did ALL of the GOP in congress oppose it?
dbapig
Participant[quote=SK in CV]
Like you, I’m pleased that it passed. But this is far from historic legislation. It is filled with ideas supported and proposed by every Republican president since Nixon. That certainly doesn’t make it bad, it’s simply less than historic. It is not a progressive bill. When insurance doesn’t cover all of women’s parts, it cannot be progressive. Hopefully, as you say, it is a step in the right direction.[/quote]So why did ALL of the GOP in congress oppose it?
dbapig
Participant[quote=SK in CV]
Like you, I’m pleased that it passed. But this is far from historic legislation. It is filled with ideas supported and proposed by every Republican president since Nixon. That certainly doesn’t make it bad, it’s simply less than historic. It is not a progressive bill. When insurance doesn’t cover all of women’s parts, it cannot be progressive. Hopefully, as you say, it is a step in the right direction.[/quote]So why did ALL of the GOP in congress oppose it?
-
AuthorPosts
