Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
cr
ParticipantIf my Grandfather’s loan for his house built in the 50’s in OC was typical, then mortgage rates were much lower. His loan was at 1%.
That’s when businesses existed to make money by helping people, not screwing them over.
ParticipantIf my Grandfather’s loan for his house built in the 50’s in OC was typical, then mortgage rates were much lower. His loan was at 1%.
That’s when businesses existed to make money by helping people, not screwing them over.
ParticipantIf my Grandfather’s loan for his house built in the 50’s in OC was typical, then mortgage rates were much lower. His loan was at 1%.
That’s when businesses existed to make money by helping people, not screwing them over.
ParticipantIf my Grandfather’s loan for his house built in the 50’s in OC was typical, then mortgage rates were much lower. His loan was at 1%.
That’s when businesses existed to make money by helping people, not screwing them over.
ParticipantI agree. No one trying to save the FB’s thinks about the longer term repercussions on future generations that will support this economy in the coming decades and be the ones working off the trillions in bailouts we are wasting today.
That said, look at how successful the $300 Billion bailout from July wasn’t.
Maybe I’m overly wishful that this won’t amount to much in rewarding stupidity, and I agree the Government will do *something*, but the banks are the ones who have to take the hit. I suppose the Gov’t could cover those losses, but you reward the reckless <10% behind on payments you'll have to answer to an angrey 90%.
ParticipantI agree. No one trying to save the FB’s thinks about the longer term repercussions on future generations that will support this economy in the coming decades and be the ones working off the trillions in bailouts we are wasting today.
That said, look at how successful the $300 Billion bailout from July wasn’t.
Maybe I’m overly wishful that this won’t amount to much in rewarding stupidity, and I agree the Government will do *something*, but the banks are the ones who have to take the hit. I suppose the Gov’t could cover those losses, but you reward the reckless <10% behind on payments you'll have to answer to an angrey 90%.
ParticipantI agree. No one trying to save the FB’s thinks about the longer term repercussions on future generations that will support this economy in the coming decades and be the ones working off the trillions in bailouts we are wasting today.
That said, look at how successful the $300 Billion bailout from July wasn’t.
Maybe I’m overly wishful that this won’t amount to much in rewarding stupidity, and I agree the Government will do *something*, but the banks are the ones who have to take the hit. I suppose the Gov’t could cover those losses, but you reward the reckless <10% behind on payments you'll have to answer to an angrey 90%.
ParticipantI agree. No one trying to save the FB’s thinks about the longer term repercussions on future generations that will support this economy in the coming decades and be the ones working off the trillions in bailouts we are wasting today.
That said, look at how successful the $300 Billion bailout from July wasn’t.
Maybe I’m overly wishful that this won’t amount to much in rewarding stupidity, and I agree the Government will do *something*, but the banks are the ones who have to take the hit. I suppose the Gov’t could cover those losses, but you reward the reckless <10% behind on payments you'll have to answer to an angrey 90%.
ParticipantI agree. No one trying to save the FB’s thinks about the longer term repercussions on future generations that will support this economy in the coming decades and be the ones working off the trillions in bailouts we are wasting today.
That said, look at how successful the $300 Billion bailout from July wasn’t.
Maybe I’m overly wishful that this won’t amount to much in rewarding stupidity, and I agree the Government will do *something*, but the banks are the ones who have to take the hit. I suppose the Gov’t could cover those losses, but you reward the reckless <10% behind on payments you'll have to answer to an angrey 90%.
November 25, 2008 at 3:14 PM in reply to: Market soars like an eagle on heels of epic Chargers’ Defeat #308928ParticipantThis has to be spam and a hacked account. I wonder if it has anything to do with the new server.
November 25, 2008 at 3:14 PM in reply to: Market soars like an eagle on heels of epic Chargers’ Defeat #309296ParticipantThis has to be spam and a hacked account. I wonder if it has anything to do with the new server.
November 25, 2008 at 3:14 PM in reply to: Market soars like an eagle on heels of epic Chargers’ Defeat #309315ParticipantThis has to be spam and a hacked account. I wonder if it has anything to do with the new server.
November 25, 2008 at 3:14 PM in reply to: Market soars like an eagle on heels of epic Chargers’ Defeat #309337ParticipantThis has to be spam and a hacked account. I wonder if it has anything to do with the new server.
November 25, 2008 at 3:14 PM in reply to: Market soars like an eagle on heels of epic Chargers’ Defeat #309398ParticipantThis has to be spam and a hacked account. I wonder if it has anything to do with the new server.
-
AuthorPosts
