Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
cr
Participant[quote=sheilawellington]Shouldn’t these guys be subject to high ethical standards?[/quote]
Shouldn’t everyone?
Participant[quote=sheilawellington]Shouldn’t these guys be subject to high ethical standards?[/quote]
Shouldn’t everyone?
Participant[quote=sheilawellington]Shouldn’t these guys be subject to high ethical standards?[/quote]
Shouldn’t everyone?
Participant[quote=sheilawellington]Shouldn’t these guys be subject to high ethical standards?[/quote]
Shouldn’t everyone?
Participant[quote=Bryan]The answer is — Production With Savings.
Government and the private sector both create jobs in our economy.
Though the government does not produce anything.
It can create a job for Paul by taxing Peter first.
Or,
it can rely on the counterfeiter Fed to inflate the money supply to encourage business loans and jobs.But since the question calls for jobs without additional debt, taxes or inflation, government is out on all three counts. But are they?
Not unless we succeed in prying the magic checkbook from it’s tentacles.
Vote to End The Fed, and usher in the Free Market.[/quote]
Your job Gov’t creating scenarios fails to meet your goal of job creation w/o raising taxes or inflation.
The only way what you say would work is if the Gov’t reduced spending in one area and allocated that money to creating jobs.
One way, would be to use all this bailout money to create jobs instead of funding corporate weekends at the spa, but even that falls under the inflation category because it’s borrowed money, so the Gov’t has to spend less on other things. How about their salaries?
How the moon landing proves the gov’t is effcient with money is beyond me, and I’d hardly call the Gov’t payroll efficient.
Bryan is right when he says the Gov’t doesn’t produce anything. They can only raise money by printing it, raising taxes, or borrowing from the future. All of which are here or on the way.
And all of which will do far less to help than lower taxes and reallocating money they currently waste and create jobs.
Here’s some pork to cut, and I’m all for ending the Fed.
Participant[quote=Bryan]The answer is — Production With Savings.
Government and the private sector both create jobs in our economy.
Though the government does not produce anything.
It can create a job for Paul by taxing Peter first.
Or,
it can rely on the counterfeiter Fed to inflate the money supply to encourage business loans and jobs.But since the question calls for jobs without additional debt, taxes or inflation, government is out on all three counts. But are they?
Not unless we succeed in prying the magic checkbook from it’s tentacles.
Vote to End The Fed, and usher in the Free Market.[/quote]
Your job Gov’t creating scenarios fails to meet your goal of job creation w/o raising taxes or inflation.
The only way what you say would work is if the Gov’t reduced spending in one area and allocated that money to creating jobs.
One way, would be to use all this bailout money to create jobs instead of funding corporate weekends at the spa, but even that falls under the inflation category because it’s borrowed money, so the Gov’t has to spend less on other things. How about their salaries?
How the moon landing proves the gov’t is effcient with money is beyond me, and I’d hardly call the Gov’t payroll efficient.
Bryan is right when he says the Gov’t doesn’t produce anything. They can only raise money by printing it, raising taxes, or borrowing from the future. All of which are here or on the way.
And all of which will do far less to help than lower taxes and reallocating money they currently waste and create jobs.
Here’s some pork to cut, and I’m all for ending the Fed.
Participant[quote=Bryan]The answer is — Production With Savings.
Government and the private sector both create jobs in our economy.
Though the government does not produce anything.
It can create a job for Paul by taxing Peter first.
Or,
it can rely on the counterfeiter Fed to inflate the money supply to encourage business loans and jobs.But since the question calls for jobs without additional debt, taxes or inflation, government is out on all three counts. But are they?
Not unless we succeed in prying the magic checkbook from it’s tentacles.
Vote to End The Fed, and usher in the Free Market.[/quote]
Your job Gov’t creating scenarios fails to meet your goal of job creation w/o raising taxes or inflation.
The only way what you say would work is if the Gov’t reduced spending in one area and allocated that money to creating jobs.
One way, would be to use all this bailout money to create jobs instead of funding corporate weekends at the spa, but even that falls under the inflation category because it’s borrowed money, so the Gov’t has to spend less on other things. How about their salaries?
How the moon landing proves the gov’t is effcient with money is beyond me, and I’d hardly call the Gov’t payroll efficient.
Bryan is right when he says the Gov’t doesn’t produce anything. They can only raise money by printing it, raising taxes, or borrowing from the future. All of which are here or on the way.
And all of which will do far less to help than lower taxes and reallocating money they currently waste and create jobs.
Here’s some pork to cut, and I’m all for ending the Fed.
Participant[quote=Bryan]The answer is — Production With Savings.
Government and the private sector both create jobs in our economy.
Though the government does not produce anything.
It can create a job for Paul by taxing Peter first.
Or,
it can rely on the counterfeiter Fed to inflate the money supply to encourage business loans and jobs.But since the question calls for jobs without additional debt, taxes or inflation, government is out on all three counts. But are they?
Not unless we succeed in prying the magic checkbook from it’s tentacles.
Vote to End The Fed, and usher in the Free Market.[/quote]
Your job Gov’t creating scenarios fails to meet your goal of job creation w/o raising taxes or inflation.
The only way what you say would work is if the Gov’t reduced spending in one area and allocated that money to creating jobs.
One way, would be to use all this bailout money to create jobs instead of funding corporate weekends at the spa, but even that falls under the inflation category because it’s borrowed money, so the Gov’t has to spend less on other things. How about their salaries?
How the moon landing proves the gov’t is effcient with money is beyond me, and I’d hardly call the Gov’t payroll efficient.
Bryan is right when he says the Gov’t doesn’t produce anything. They can only raise money by printing it, raising taxes, or borrowing from the future. All of which are here or on the way.
And all of which will do far less to help than lower taxes and reallocating money they currently waste and create jobs.
Here’s some pork to cut, and I’m all for ending the Fed.
Participant[quote=Bryan]The answer is — Production With Savings.
Government and the private sector both create jobs in our economy.
Though the government does not produce anything.
It can create a job for Paul by taxing Peter first.
Or,
it can rely on the counterfeiter Fed to inflate the money supply to encourage business loans and jobs.But since the question calls for jobs without additional debt, taxes or inflation, government is out on all three counts. But are they?
Not unless we succeed in prying the magic checkbook from it’s tentacles.
Vote to End The Fed, and usher in the Free Market.[/quote]
Your job Gov’t creating scenarios fails to meet your goal of job creation w/o raising taxes or inflation.
The only way what you say would work is if the Gov’t reduced spending in one area and allocated that money to creating jobs.
One way, would be to use all this bailout money to create jobs instead of funding corporate weekends at the spa, but even that falls under the inflation category because it’s borrowed money, so the Gov’t has to spend less on other things. How about their salaries?
How the moon landing proves the gov’t is effcient with money is beyond me, and I’d hardly call the Gov’t payroll efficient.
Bryan is right when he says the Gov’t doesn’t produce anything. They can only raise money by printing it, raising taxes, or borrowing from the future. All of which are here or on the way.
And all of which will do far less to help than lower taxes and reallocating money they currently waste and create jobs.
Here’s some pork to cut, and I’m all for ending the Fed.
Participant[quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.Why is raising taxes the only answer? Why can’t the Government spend less? When did Congress last take a paycut?
Participant[quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.Why is raising taxes the only answer? Why can’t the Government spend less? When did Congress last take a paycut?
Participant[quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.Why is raising taxes the only answer? Why can’t the Government spend less? When did Congress last take a paycut?
Participant[quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.Why is raising taxes the only answer? Why can’t the Government spend less? When did Congress last take a paycut?
Participant[quote=UCGal]But small businesses in the wrong sector will fail.
Being a small business isn’t enough to guarantee success.[/quote]
Any company not good at what they do will likely fail. My point in attempting to answer the question was to identify where jobs will come from. It goes without saying businesses need to be competent, efficient and profitable. Only the Government (and now its list of bailed out companies) can operate incompetently, inefficiently and continue overspending.Why is raising taxes the only answer? Why can’t the Government spend less? When did Congress last take a paycut?
-
AuthorPosts
