[cr]

I wonder what the total amount of layoffs listed and unlisted is, including people who quit on their own, were fired, or are no longer working for any other reason. I.e. the actual total number of jobs lost.

Obama may or may not be able to create 2.5 million jobs here, but if he does, it may not even make up for the losses we will see by the time this thing is over.

Sad.

[cr]

I wonder what the total amount of layoffs listed and unlisted is, including people who quit on their own, were fired, or are no longer working for any other reason. I.e. the actual total number of jobs lost.

Obama may or may not be able to create 2.5 million jobs here, but if he does, it may not even make up for the losses we will see by the time this thing is over.

Sad.

[cr]

I wonder what the total amount of layoffs listed and unlisted is, including people who quit on their own, were fired, or are no longer working for any other reason. I.e. the actual total number of jobs lost.

Obama may or may not be able to create 2.5 million jobs here, but if he does, it may not even make up for the losses we will see by the time this thing is over.

Sad.

[cr]

I wonder what the total amount of layoffs listed and unlisted is, including people who quit on their own, were fired, or are no longer working for any other reason. I.e. the actual total number of jobs lost.

Obama may or may not be able to create 2.5 million jobs here, but if he does, it may not even make up for the losses we will see by the time this thing is over.

Sad.

[cr]

I wonder what the total amount of layoffs listed and unlisted is, including people who quit on their own, were fired, or are no longer working for any other reason. I.e. the actual total number of jobs lost.

Obama may or may not be able to create 2.5 million jobs here, but if he does, it may not even make up for the losses we will see by the time this thing is over.

Sad.

[cr]

“It’s absolutely counterproductive,” he said, “to try and prop up prices.”

Tell that to the Gov’t.

[cr]

“It’s absolutely counterproductive,” he said, “to try and prop up prices.”

Tell that to the Gov’t.

[cr]

“It’s absolutely counterproductive,” he said, “to try and prop up prices.”

Tell that to the Gov’t.

[cr]

“It’s absolutely counterproductive,” he said, “to try and prop up prices.”

Tell that to the Gov’t.

[cr]

“It’s absolutely counterproductive,” he said, “to try and prop up prices.”

Tell that to the Gov’t.

[cr]

[quote=reddgreen]Ahh, and that web site is not at all biased. Do you *honestly* think that a similar cross section of ill-informed republicans voting for McCain could not be found. American PEOPLE aren’t much involved in the voting process, i.e. education on the candidates, and their issues.

Im no Obama fan, nor am I a fan of McCain, or Guiliani, or any of the other losers we had for candidates.

If you believe what that web site is selling, then you get what you deserve. Its not a “republican vs democrat” or “liberal vs conservative” issue. Its much bigger than that. While we’re bickering over which candidate will destroy the country as we know it, we’re getting stuck with loser candidates all around.[/quote]

You missed the point: the media brain-washed the public into voting for Obama. Believing that means I deserve Obama being elected? That makes no sense. I didn’t vote for McCain or Obama.

I’ve said all along the two are no different.

Republicans are acting like Democrats, and Democrats (and Paulson) are acting like Socialists.

It’s all so F*#$%d up, and I’m dissapointed to see people here resort to petty comments and stereotyping of any group. So quick to deride Bush for a southern accent, yet so quick to defend Obama for not wanting to punish his daughters with a child, or having visited 57 states. So quick to accuse Bush of the housing crisis, yet so conveniently forgetting Obama’s role in the Community Reinvestment Act and subprime mortgages.

The fact that so many ardently defend Obama’s stupidity by pointing to Bush’s proves the media sold this election. The question is to who?

[cr]

[quote=reddgreen]Ahh, and that web site is not at all biased. Do you *honestly* think that a similar cross section of ill-informed republicans voting for McCain could not be found. American PEOPLE aren’t much involved in the voting process, i.e. education on the candidates, and their issues.

Im no Obama fan, nor am I a fan of McCain, or Guiliani, or any of the other losers we had for candidates.

If you believe what that web site is selling, then you get what you deserve. Its not a “republican vs democrat” or “liberal vs conservative” issue. Its much bigger than that. While we’re bickering over which candidate will destroy the country as we know it, we’re getting stuck with loser candidates all around.[/quote]

You missed the point: the media brain-washed the public into voting for Obama. Believing that means I deserve Obama being elected? That makes no sense. I didn’t vote for McCain or Obama.

I’ve said all along the two are no different.

Republicans are acting like Democrats, and Democrats (and Paulson) are acting like Socialists.

It’s all so F*#$%d up, and I’m dissapointed to see people here resort to petty comments and stereotyping of any group. So quick to deride Bush for a southern accent, yet so quick to defend Obama for not wanting to punish his daughters with a child, or having visited 57 states. So quick to accuse Bush of the housing crisis, yet so conveniently forgetting Obama’s role in the Community Reinvestment Act and subprime mortgages.

The fact that so many ardently defend Obama’s stupidity by pointing to Bush’s proves the media sold this election. The question is to who?

[cr]

[quote=reddgreen]Ahh, and that web site is not at all biased. Do you *honestly* think that a similar cross section of ill-informed republicans voting for McCain could not be found. American PEOPLE aren’t much involved in the voting process, i.e. education on the candidates, and their issues.

Im no Obama fan, nor am I a fan of McCain, or Guiliani, or any of the other losers we had for candidates.

If you believe what that web site is selling, then you get what you deserve. Its not a “republican vs democrat” or “liberal vs conservative” issue. Its much bigger than that. While we’re bickering over which candidate will destroy the country as we know it, we’re getting stuck with loser candidates all around.[/quote]

You missed the point: the media brain-washed the public into voting for Obama. Believing that means I deserve Obama being elected? That makes no sense. I didn’t vote for McCain or Obama.

I’ve said all along the two are no different.

Republicans are acting like Democrats, and Democrats (and Paulson) are acting like Socialists.

It’s all so F*#$%d up, and I’m dissapointed to see people here resort to petty comments and stereotyping of any group. So quick to deride Bush for a southern accent, yet so quick to defend Obama for not wanting to punish his daughters with a child, or having visited 57 states. So quick to accuse Bush of the housing crisis, yet so conveniently forgetting Obama’s role in the Community Reinvestment Act and subprime mortgages.

The fact that so many ardently defend Obama’s stupidity by pointing to Bush’s proves the media sold this election. The question is to who?

[cr]

[quote=reddgreen]Ahh, and that web site is not at all biased. Do you *honestly* think that a similar cross section of ill-informed republicans voting for McCain could not be found. American PEOPLE aren’t much involved in the voting process, i.e. education on the candidates, and their issues.

Im no Obama fan, nor am I a fan of McCain, or Guiliani, or any of the other losers we had for candidates.

If you believe what that web site is selling, then you get what you deserve. Its not a “republican vs democrat” or “liberal vs conservative” issue. Its much bigger than that. While we’re bickering over which candidate will destroy the country as we know it, we’re getting stuck with loser candidates all around.[/quote]

You missed the point: the media brain-washed the public into voting for Obama. Believing that means I deserve Obama being elected? That makes no sense. I didn’t vote for McCain or Obama.

I’ve said all along the two are no different.

Republicans are acting like Democrats, and Democrats (and Paulson) are acting like Socialists.

It’s all so F*#$%d up, and I’m dissapointed to see people here resort to petty comments and stereotyping of any group. So quick to deride Bush for a southern accent, yet so quick to defend Obama for not wanting to punish his daughters with a child, or having visited 57 states. So quick to accuse Bush of the housing crisis, yet so conveniently forgetting Obama’s role in the Community Reinvestment Act and subprime mortgages.

The fact that so many ardently defend Obama’s stupidity by pointing to Bush’s proves the media sold this election. The question is to who?

[cr]

[quote=reddgreen]Ahh, and that web site is not at all biased. Do you *honestly* think that a similar cross section of ill-informed republicans voting for McCain could not be found. American PEOPLE aren’t much involved in the voting process, i.e. education on the candidates, and their issues.

Im no Obama fan, nor am I a fan of McCain, or Guiliani, or any of the other losers we had for candidates.

If you believe what that web site is selling, then you get what you deserve. Its not a “republican vs democrat” or “liberal vs conservative” issue. Its much bigger than that. While we’re bickering over which candidate will destroy the country as we know it, we’re getting stuck with loser candidates all around.[/quote]

You missed the point: the media brain-washed the public into voting for Obama. Believing that means I deserve Obama being elected? That makes no sense. I didn’t vote for McCain or Obama.

I’ve said all along the two are no different.

Republicans are acting like Democrats, and Democrats (and Paulson) are acting like Socialists.

It’s all so F*#$%d up, and I’m dissapointed to see people here resort to petty comments and stereotyping of any group. So quick to deride Bush for a southern accent, yet so quick to defend Obama for not wanting to punish his daughters with a child, or having visited 57 states. So quick to accuse Bush of the housing crisis, yet so conveniently forgetting Obama’s role in the Community Reinvestment Act and subprime mortgages.

The fact that so many ardently defend Obama’s stupidity by pointing to Bush’s proves the media sold this election. The question is to who?

[Author]

Posts