Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
cr
Participant20% might not even cut it, and a lot of people in the worst hit areas like So Cal don’t even want to stay in a house that doesn’t make them feel rich by being worth more than they could possibly afford.
Participant20% might not even cut it, and a lot of people in the worst hit areas like So Cal don’t even want to stay in a house that doesn’t make them feel rich by being worth more than they could possibly afford.
Participant20% might not even cut it, and a lot of people in the worst hit areas like So Cal don’t even want to stay in a house that doesn’t make them feel rich by being worth more than they could possibly afford.
Participant20% might not even cut it, and a lot of people in the worst hit areas like So Cal don’t even want to stay in a house that doesn’t make them feel rich by being worth more than they could possibly afford.
Participant[quote=UCGal]Just an observation..
I think the days of 3.5% annual increases are gone for the near term.
More and more employers are looking at salary REDUCTIONS.
(Yes, it sucks.)[/quote]
Unless you’re a member of congress. Then it’s 2.8%. http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/97-1011.pdf
The sad thing is we pay for their increase despite getting a reduction.
Participant[quote=UCGal]Just an observation..
I think the days of 3.5% annual increases are gone for the near term.
More and more employers are looking at salary REDUCTIONS.
(Yes, it sucks.)[/quote]
Unless you’re a member of congress. Then it’s 2.8%. http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/97-1011.pdf
The sad thing is we pay for their increase despite getting a reduction.
Participant[quote=UCGal]Just an observation..
I think the days of 3.5% annual increases are gone for the near term.
More and more employers are looking at salary REDUCTIONS.
(Yes, it sucks.)[/quote]
Unless you’re a member of congress. Then it’s 2.8%. http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/97-1011.pdf
The sad thing is we pay for their increase despite getting a reduction.
Participant[quote=UCGal]Just an observation..
I think the days of 3.5% annual increases are gone for the near term.
More and more employers are looking at salary REDUCTIONS.
(Yes, it sucks.)[/quote]
Unless you’re a member of congress. Then it’s 2.8%. http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/97-1011.pdf
The sad thing is we pay for their increase despite getting a reduction.
Participant[quote=UCGal]Just an observation..
I think the days of 3.5% annual increases are gone for the near term.
More and more employers are looking at salary REDUCTIONS.
(Yes, it sucks.)[/quote]
Unless you’re a member of congress. Then it’s 2.8%. http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/97-1011.pdf
The sad thing is we pay for their increase despite getting a reduction.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM in reply to: OT: World Press Photo of the Year: 2008 – guess the subject? #345905ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM in reply to: OT: World Press Photo of the Year: 2008 – guess the subject? #346227ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM in reply to: OT: World Press Photo of the Year: 2008 – guess the subject? #346335ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM in reply to: OT: World Press Photo of the Year: 2008 – guess the subject? #346368ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
February 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM in reply to: OT: World Press Photo of the Year: 2008 – guess the subject? #346467ParticipantNext year’s will be the state of California being evicted from the union.
-
AuthorPosts
