Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
cr
ParticipantAt the risk of perpetuating OT posts, I’d suggest those who support Barack Hussein Obama II do a little reaserch on what he actually wants to do, and some of the things he has actually said before casting your vote for someone simply because they are not someone else.
Here’s one quote that literally made my skin crawl.
“I’ve got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
Punished with a baby? Teach them morals, but no responsibility for their actions? Forget the abortion issue here, read between the lines.
ParticipantAt the risk of perpetuating OT posts, I’d suggest those who support Barack Hussein Obama II do a little reaserch on what he actually wants to do, and some of the things he has actually said before casting your vote for someone simply because they are not someone else.
Here’s one quote that literally made my skin crawl.
“I’ve got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
Punished with a baby? Teach them morals, but no responsibility for their actions? Forget the abortion issue here, read between the lines.
ParticipantAt the risk of perpetuating OT posts, I’d suggest those who support Barack Hussein Obama II do a little reaserch on what he actually wants to do, and some of the things he has actually said before casting your vote for someone simply because they are not someone else.
Here’s one quote that literally made my skin crawl.
“I’ve got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
Punished with a baby? Teach them morals, but no responsibility for their actions? Forget the abortion issue here, read between the lines.
July 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM in reply to: SD New Home Sales up 42% – Existing inventory down 15% YOY — Means what? #242222Participanthttp://www.housingwire.com/2008/07/18/june-home-resales-in-california-slowest-since-1988/
Nowhere near bottom if these two bubble timelines conincide at all.
Then again, job losses caused the 90’s crash, and this time (really is different) the crash is causing job losses.
Conclusion? Bottom still out of sight.
July 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM in reply to: SD New Home Sales up 42% – Existing inventory down 15% YOY — Means what? #242363Participanthttp://www.housingwire.com/2008/07/18/june-home-resales-in-california-slowest-since-1988/
Nowhere near bottom if these two bubble timelines conincide at all.
Then again, job losses caused the 90’s crash, and this time (really is different) the crash is causing job losses.
Conclusion? Bottom still out of sight.
July 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM in reply to: SD New Home Sales up 42% – Existing inventory down 15% YOY — Means what? #242371Participanthttp://www.housingwire.com/2008/07/18/june-home-resales-in-california-slowest-since-1988/
Nowhere near bottom if these two bubble timelines conincide at all.
Then again, job losses caused the 90’s crash, and this time (really is different) the crash is causing job losses.
Conclusion? Bottom still out of sight.
July 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM in reply to: SD New Home Sales up 42% – Existing inventory down 15% YOY — Means what? #242427Participanthttp://www.housingwire.com/2008/07/18/june-home-resales-in-california-slowest-since-1988/
Nowhere near bottom if these two bubble timelines conincide at all.
Then again, job losses caused the 90’s crash, and this time (really is different) the crash is causing job losses.
Conclusion? Bottom still out of sight.
July 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM in reply to: SD New Home Sales up 42% – Existing inventory down 15% YOY — Means what? #242434Participanthttp://www.housingwire.com/2008/07/18/june-home-resales-in-california-slowest-since-1988/
Nowhere near bottom if these two bubble timelines conincide at all.
Then again, job losses caused the 90’s crash, and this time (really is different) the crash is causing job losses.
Conclusion? Bottom still out of sight.
July 18, 2008 at 3:13 PM in reply to: Recession-Plagued Nation Demands New Bubble To Invest In #242424ParticipantH2O
No, not the vehicle symbolizing the rise and fall of housing.
ParticipantZillow also occasionsally, (and seemingly more commonly) intentionally ignores the most recent sale of the house you’re looking at a Zestimate for.
I don’t understand this. Even if it’s a short isn’t that market value?
ParticipantZillow also occasionsally, (and seemingly more commonly) intentionally ignores the most recent sale of the house you’re looking at a Zestimate for.
I don’t understand this. Even if it’s a short isn’t that market value?
ParticipantZillow also occasionsally, (and seemingly more commonly) intentionally ignores the most recent sale of the house you’re looking at a Zestimate for.
I don’t understand this. Even if it’s a short isn’t that market value?
ParticipantZillow also occasionsally, (and seemingly more commonly) intentionally ignores the most recent sale of the house you’re looking at a Zestimate for.
I don’t understand this. Even if it’s a short isn’t that market value?
ParticipantZillow also occasionsally, (and seemingly more commonly) intentionally ignores the most recent sale of the house you’re looking at a Zestimate for.
I don’t understand this. Even if it’s a short isn’t that market value?
-
AuthorPosts
