Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142060January 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142287
CoronitaParticipantFor you folks in SD, homes up here tend to be old and not updated so when you find one that is newer or updated, people act like they just saw a shooting star and quickly wish upon it with their checkbooks before it dissapears.
Don't even get me started on this, especially homes in Cupertino and Palo Alto.
Seriously, the difference between price insanity here in SD and price insanity in the bay area is the former $1million buys you a nice stucco box about 10 years old around 2600sqft with a small backyard that will probably fall apart 10 years from the day you buy it. The latter will buy you a 2-3 bedroom 20 to 30+year hole in the wall, that has fallen apart, but nevertheless slapped together again by the previous owners.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142300
CoronitaParticipantFor you folks in SD, homes up here tend to be old and not updated so when you find one that is newer or updated, people act like they just saw a shooting star and quickly wish upon it with their checkbooks before it dissapears.
Don't even get me started on this, especially homes in Cupertino and Palo Alto.
Seriously, the difference between price insanity here in SD and price insanity in the bay area is the former $1million buys you a nice stucco box about 10 years old around 2600sqft with a small backyard that will probably fall apart 10 years from the day you buy it. The latter will buy you a 2-3 bedroom 20 to 30+year hole in the wall, that has fallen apart, but nevertheless slapped together again by the previous owners.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142327
CoronitaParticipantFor you folks in SD, homes up here tend to be old and not updated so when you find one that is newer or updated, people act like they just saw a shooting star and quickly wish upon it with their checkbooks before it dissapears.
Don't even get me started on this, especially homes in Cupertino and Palo Alto.
Seriously, the difference between price insanity here in SD and price insanity in the bay area is the former $1million buys you a nice stucco box about 10 years old around 2600sqft with a small backyard that will probably fall apart 10 years from the day you buy it. The latter will buy you a 2-3 bedroom 20 to 30+year hole in the wall, that has fallen apart, but nevertheless slapped together again by the previous owners.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 10:15 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142389
CoronitaParticipantFor you folks in SD, homes up here tend to be old and not updated so when you find one that is newer or updated, people act like they just saw a shooting star and quickly wish upon it with their checkbooks before it dissapears.
Don't even get me started on this, especially homes in Cupertino and Palo Alto.
Seriously, the difference between price insanity here in SD and price insanity in the bay area is the former $1million buys you a nice stucco box about 10 years old around 2600sqft with a small backyard that will probably fall apart 10 years from the day you buy it. The latter will buy you a 2-3 bedroom 20 to 30+year hole in the wall, that has fallen apart, but nevertheless slapped together again by the previous owners.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142051
CoronitaParticipantI've noticed in the past, the economies of norcal and socal often move tangential. When commercial tech is hot, non-tech isn't and vice versus. In the last major recession here in socal, mainly due to defense spending cutbacks, then spilling over int services such as RE, that same period, bay area was just fine.
During the dotcom bust, socal economy was doing fine (hence the migration from nor cal to so cal). I have a feeling tha we'll start to se a migration back from so cal to nor cal.
Honestly, I contemplated this myself. There aren't that many great opportunities natively in SoCal for what I do. And while I'm really well compensated at my current position and responsibilities, all good things must end at some point- one bad quarter, one bad relationship, anything random..poof. it's over.
So anticipating plan B is necessary, my options are really to start a company, work remotely for NorCal company, or move back to norCal in case something should happen to my current employment.
What I don't get is why people/companies here in SD have such a hard time understanding that there is nothing wrong with switching positions every 2-3 years. You sort of have to in order to stay current if your employer pigeon hole's you into a menial task. Employers want what is current. At the same time, i see it ironic that several down here frown on folks that move around or don't let people grow into that new role. In the bay area, you had no choice, because companies/positions come and go, the only thing constant was your skills, knowledge, and your relationships you build with people. So part of working in the bay area for me was just being use to moving around. Down here, layoffs are a big deal, because the markets not as fluid.
Oh well. Fortunately, having a place in both areas will make realization of plan B (if needed) more possible..which is why I tell people never to sell a primary home in the bay area. It was and always will be tech capital, irrespective of what happens in the rest of the world. If some ideas move overseas, some new idea will start up in the bay area. Has been that way, always will be.
The only real reason why i even moved back here was I lost a coin toss with the significant other. But the significant other is thinking about plan B these days too, as it seems like one of the major employer's growth is starting to stagnant.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142277
CoronitaParticipantI've noticed in the past, the economies of norcal and socal often move tangential. When commercial tech is hot, non-tech isn't and vice versus. In the last major recession here in socal, mainly due to defense spending cutbacks, then spilling over int services such as RE, that same period, bay area was just fine.
During the dotcom bust, socal economy was doing fine (hence the migration from nor cal to so cal). I have a feeling tha we'll start to se a migration back from so cal to nor cal.
Honestly, I contemplated this myself. There aren't that many great opportunities natively in SoCal for what I do. And while I'm really well compensated at my current position and responsibilities, all good things must end at some point- one bad quarter, one bad relationship, anything random..poof. it's over.
So anticipating plan B is necessary, my options are really to start a company, work remotely for NorCal company, or move back to norCal in case something should happen to my current employment.
What I don't get is why people/companies here in SD have such a hard time understanding that there is nothing wrong with switching positions every 2-3 years. You sort of have to in order to stay current if your employer pigeon hole's you into a menial task. Employers want what is current. At the same time, i see it ironic that several down here frown on folks that move around or don't let people grow into that new role. In the bay area, you had no choice, because companies/positions come and go, the only thing constant was your skills, knowledge, and your relationships you build with people. So part of working in the bay area for me was just being use to moving around. Down here, layoffs are a big deal, because the markets not as fluid.
Oh well. Fortunately, having a place in both areas will make realization of plan B (if needed) more possible..which is why I tell people never to sell a primary home in the bay area. It was and always will be tech capital, irrespective of what happens in the rest of the world. If some ideas move overseas, some new idea will start up in the bay area. Has been that way, always will be.
The only real reason why i even moved back here was I lost a coin toss with the significant other. But the significant other is thinking about plan B these days too, as it seems like one of the major employer's growth is starting to stagnant.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142290
CoronitaParticipantI've noticed in the past, the economies of norcal and socal often move tangential. When commercial tech is hot, non-tech isn't and vice versus. In the last major recession here in socal, mainly due to defense spending cutbacks, then spilling over int services such as RE, that same period, bay area was just fine.
During the dotcom bust, socal economy was doing fine (hence the migration from nor cal to so cal). I have a feeling tha we'll start to se a migration back from so cal to nor cal.
Honestly, I contemplated this myself. There aren't that many great opportunities natively in SoCal for what I do. And while I'm really well compensated at my current position and responsibilities, all good things must end at some point- one bad quarter, one bad relationship, anything random..poof. it's over.
So anticipating plan B is necessary, my options are really to start a company, work remotely for NorCal company, or move back to norCal in case something should happen to my current employment.
What I don't get is why people/companies here in SD have such a hard time understanding that there is nothing wrong with switching positions every 2-3 years. You sort of have to in order to stay current if your employer pigeon hole's you into a menial task. Employers want what is current. At the same time, i see it ironic that several down here frown on folks that move around or don't let people grow into that new role. In the bay area, you had no choice, because companies/positions come and go, the only thing constant was your skills, knowledge, and your relationships you build with people. So part of working in the bay area for me was just being use to moving around. Down here, layoffs are a big deal, because the markets not as fluid.
Oh well. Fortunately, having a place in both areas will make realization of plan B (if needed) more possible..which is why I tell people never to sell a primary home in the bay area. It was and always will be tech capital, irrespective of what happens in the rest of the world. If some ideas move overseas, some new idea will start up in the bay area. Has been that way, always will be.
The only real reason why i even moved back here was I lost a coin toss with the significant other. But the significant other is thinking about plan B these days too, as it seems like one of the major employer's growth is starting to stagnant.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142318
CoronitaParticipantI've noticed in the past, the economies of norcal and socal often move tangential. When commercial tech is hot, non-tech isn't and vice versus. In the last major recession here in socal, mainly due to defense spending cutbacks, then spilling over int services such as RE, that same period, bay area was just fine.
During the dotcom bust, socal economy was doing fine (hence the migration from nor cal to so cal). I have a feeling tha we'll start to se a migration back from so cal to nor cal.
Honestly, I contemplated this myself. There aren't that many great opportunities natively in SoCal for what I do. And while I'm really well compensated at my current position and responsibilities, all good things must end at some point- one bad quarter, one bad relationship, anything random..poof. it's over.
So anticipating plan B is necessary, my options are really to start a company, work remotely for NorCal company, or move back to norCal in case something should happen to my current employment.
What I don't get is why people/companies here in SD have such a hard time understanding that there is nothing wrong with switching positions every 2-3 years. You sort of have to in order to stay current if your employer pigeon hole's you into a menial task. Employers want what is current. At the same time, i see it ironic that several down here frown on folks that move around or don't let people grow into that new role. In the bay area, you had no choice, because companies/positions come and go, the only thing constant was your skills, knowledge, and your relationships you build with people. So part of working in the bay area for me was just being use to moving around. Down here, layoffs are a big deal, because the markets not as fluid.
Oh well. Fortunately, having a place in both areas will make realization of plan B (if needed) more possible..which is why I tell people never to sell a primary home in the bay area. It was and always will be tech capital, irrespective of what happens in the rest of the world. If some ideas move overseas, some new idea will start up in the bay area. Has been that way, always will be.
The only real reason why i even moved back here was I lost a coin toss with the significant other. But the significant other is thinking about plan B these days too, as it seems like one of the major employer's growth is starting to stagnant.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142379
CoronitaParticipantI've noticed in the past, the economies of norcal and socal often move tangential. When commercial tech is hot, non-tech isn't and vice versus. In the last major recession here in socal, mainly due to defense spending cutbacks, then spilling over int services such as RE, that same period, bay area was just fine.
During the dotcom bust, socal economy was doing fine (hence the migration from nor cal to so cal). I have a feeling tha we'll start to se a migration back from so cal to nor cal.
Honestly, I contemplated this myself. There aren't that many great opportunities natively in SoCal for what I do. And while I'm really well compensated at my current position and responsibilities, all good things must end at some point- one bad quarter, one bad relationship, anything random..poof. it's over.
So anticipating plan B is necessary, my options are really to start a company, work remotely for NorCal company, or move back to norCal in case something should happen to my current employment.
What I don't get is why people/companies here in SD have such a hard time understanding that there is nothing wrong with switching positions every 2-3 years. You sort of have to in order to stay current if your employer pigeon hole's you into a menial task. Employers want what is current. At the same time, i see it ironic that several down here frown on folks that move around or don't let people grow into that new role. In the bay area, you had no choice, because companies/positions come and go, the only thing constant was your skills, knowledge, and your relationships you build with people. So part of working in the bay area for me was just being use to moving around. Down here, layoffs are a big deal, because the markets not as fluid.
Oh well. Fortunately, having a place in both areas will make realization of plan B (if needed) more possible..which is why I tell people never to sell a primary home in the bay area. It was and always will be tech capital, irrespective of what happens in the rest of the world. If some ideas move overseas, some new idea will start up in the bay area. Has been that way, always will be.
The only real reason why i even moved back here was I lost a coin toss with the significant other. But the significant other is thinking about plan B these days too, as it seems like one of the major employer's growth is starting to stagnant.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 9:51 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142016
CoronitaParticipantYahoo is one screwed up company. (Don't ask me how I know, but I do..) In a perfect economy, they would still have trouble. In fact, if they laidoff 1/2 of the employees, I don't see that the company would suffer.
As far as the bay area. There's plenty of startups small and large, and plenty of inflow vc money into these startups. Where else is vc going to invest in these days?
Doing a comparable job search on something like hotjob (not that hotjob is that great)
i get 64 hits here in san diego
I get 640+ hits in the bay area.
Which tech industry in which location will evaporate first? You tell me.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 9:51 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142243
CoronitaParticipantYahoo is one screwed up company. (Don't ask me how I know, but I do..) In a perfect economy, they would still have trouble. In fact, if they laidoff 1/2 of the employees, I don't see that the company would suffer.
As far as the bay area. There's plenty of startups small and large, and plenty of inflow vc money into these startups. Where else is vc going to invest in these days?
Doing a comparable job search on something like hotjob (not that hotjob is that great)
i get 64 hits here in san diego
I get 640+ hits in the bay area.
Which tech industry in which location will evaporate first? You tell me.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 9:51 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142255
CoronitaParticipantYahoo is one screwed up company. (Don't ask me how I know, but I do..) In a perfect economy, they would still have trouble. In fact, if they laidoff 1/2 of the employees, I don't see that the company would suffer.
As far as the bay area. There's plenty of startups small and large, and plenty of inflow vc money into these startups. Where else is vc going to invest in these days?
Doing a comparable job search on something like hotjob (not that hotjob is that great)
i get 64 hits here in san diego
I get 640+ hits in the bay area.
Which tech industry in which location will evaporate first? You tell me.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 9:51 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142283
CoronitaParticipantYahoo is one screwed up company. (Don't ask me how I know, but I do..) In a perfect economy, they would still have trouble. In fact, if they laidoff 1/2 of the employees, I don't see that the company would suffer.
As far as the bay area. There's plenty of startups small and large, and plenty of inflow vc money into these startups. Where else is vc going to invest in these days?
Doing a comparable job search on something like hotjob (not that hotjob is that great)
i get 64 hits here in san diego
I get 640+ hits in the bay area.
Which tech industry in which location will evaporate first? You tell me.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
January 24, 2008 at 9:51 AM in reply to: Price movement over 3 years in certain RSF and Bay Area homes #142344
CoronitaParticipantYahoo is one screwed up company. (Don't ask me how I know, but I do..) In a perfect economy, they would still have trouble. In fact, if they laidoff 1/2 of the employees, I don't see that the company would suffer.
As far as the bay area. There's plenty of startups small and large, and plenty of inflow vc money into these startups. Where else is vc going to invest in these days?
Doing a comparable job search on something like hotjob (not that hotjob is that great)
i get 64 hits here in san diego
I get 640+ hits in the bay area.
Which tech industry in which location will evaporate first? You tell me.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
AuthorPosts
