Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
CDMA ENG
ParticipantSo,
I have to ask, what is the benefit in this. Even if the current home owners want to stay in the property for the next couple of years at some point aren’t they going to say “why the hell am I paying 400K for this house when its only worth 300K?”. At some point they will walk away anyway?!?
Sounds like good money after bad again to me.
Take Care Piggs…
CDMA ENG
ParticipantSo,
I have to ask, what is the benefit in this. Even if the current home owners want to stay in the property for the next couple of years at some point aren’t they going to say “why the hell am I paying 400K for this house when its only worth 300K?”. At some point they will walk away anyway?!?
Sounds like good money after bad again to me.
Take Care Piggs…
July 28, 2008 at 11:18 PM in reply to: Off Topic: “Moon-walker claims alien contact cover-up” #248510CDMA ENG
Participant“They don’t let anyone go to the moon. If he was the slightest bit nutty it would have come out in his pysch evaluations and he would have never gone on Apollo 14.”
The didnt catch Carpenter and he damn near didnt make de-orbit. NASA made sure he never flew again. He is a very cool but very loony dude. And the reason the dont show the stream live and unscrambled is because some female astronuat said “hey look its a UFO”. Happened not to long ago and you can find the footage on youtube! Makes you go hmmm…
CE
July 28, 2008 at 11:18 PM in reply to: Off Topic: “Moon-walker claims alien contact cover-up” #248667CDMA ENG
Participant“They don’t let anyone go to the moon. If he was the slightest bit nutty it would have come out in his pysch evaluations and he would have never gone on Apollo 14.”
The didnt catch Carpenter and he damn near didnt make de-orbit. NASA made sure he never flew again. He is a very cool but very loony dude. And the reason the dont show the stream live and unscrambled is because some female astronuat said “hey look its a UFO”. Happened not to long ago and you can find the footage on youtube! Makes you go hmmm…
CE
July 28, 2008 at 11:18 PM in reply to: Off Topic: “Moon-walker claims alien contact cover-up” #248673CDMA ENG
Participant“They don’t let anyone go to the moon. If he was the slightest bit nutty it would have come out in his pysch evaluations and he would have never gone on Apollo 14.”
The didnt catch Carpenter and he damn near didnt make de-orbit. NASA made sure he never flew again. He is a very cool but very loony dude. And the reason the dont show the stream live and unscrambled is because some female astronuat said “hey look its a UFO”. Happened not to long ago and you can find the footage on youtube! Makes you go hmmm…
CE
July 28, 2008 at 11:18 PM in reply to: Off Topic: “Moon-walker claims alien contact cover-up” #248731CDMA ENG
Participant“They don’t let anyone go to the moon. If he was the slightest bit nutty it would have come out in his pysch evaluations and he would have never gone on Apollo 14.”
The didnt catch Carpenter and he damn near didnt make de-orbit. NASA made sure he never flew again. He is a very cool but very loony dude. And the reason the dont show the stream live and unscrambled is because some female astronuat said “hey look its a UFO”. Happened not to long ago and you can find the footage on youtube! Makes you go hmmm…
CE
July 28, 2008 at 11:18 PM in reply to: Off Topic: “Moon-walker claims alien contact cover-up” #248740CDMA ENG
Participant“They don’t let anyone go to the moon. If he was the slightest bit nutty it would have come out in his pysch evaluations and he would have never gone on Apollo 14.”
The didnt catch Carpenter and he damn near didnt make de-orbit. NASA made sure he never flew again. He is a very cool but very loony dude. And the reason the dont show the stream live and unscrambled is because some female astronuat said “hey look its a UFO”. Happened not to long ago and you can find the footage on youtube! Makes you go hmmm…
CE
CDMA ENG
ParticipantYeah I am with you on a lot of what you have said Grey Pilgrim. I did not like the Schivo thing either and when it comes to the whole Republican – Religious thing I am right with you in disgust.
As for engery policy… Shhhhyyyttttt… Don’t get me started. As some one who has done a little research in the alternative engery area… The R’s have thrown more money at it than the D’s in the last twenty years. But even that is not really a valid arguement when considering the amoutn of money it was. The R’s pushed “a drop in the bucket” kinda of money at it and the D’s pushed a little less than that. Don’t look to either for energy policy. The market will take care of that one on its own. So no… You can’t sell my on that point.
JM blathering about his tax holiday was only supposed to be a temporary thing to give some quick relief to some. It was never intended to be a long term strategy so that is not a valid arguement. And I even have to agree with the policy somewhat because even though oil has fallen I still hear and see people struggling to get to work (at least in the very short term)
As for the paritisanship… McCain was considered an under-dog from day one BECAUSE of his voting record AGAINST the republicans. Remember he has had a hell of a time courting the right and has been considered traitorous because he will not vote party lines. This is the one republican candidate that the democrats should be rooting for. I think he is the most moderate of the other R’s out there. As for Obama I think he would be more polarizing. In his defense I am sure that there are many schmuck R’s out there that would vote against him only because he is a D’s. I think the D’s would be more open minded to JM so you have so wiggle room there.
So inconclusion, you haven’t sold me yet. But I will do my homework that you have asked me to and google that.
I don’t believe that Obama is a flaming liberal lefty. I know that he is more moderate than that but I really think all this Camelot crap is dissaffecting (did I use the word correctly) and most of his team encourge him. I think without all the hype I could be more convinced but he really isn’t going to change the direction of this country dramatically and I am concerned with someone that would propagate that myth.
It is like Frodo said in books… “Some how I think the enemy would look fair and feel foul” to which Aragon replied “while I look foul and feel fair?”. That is how I feel about the two.
Gandalf I will reply when I have read that article chartible. I promised to keep an open mind and I will.
Take Care Piggs!
CE
CDMA ENG
ParticipantYeah I am with you on a lot of what you have said Grey Pilgrim. I did not like the Schivo thing either and when it comes to the whole Republican – Religious thing I am right with you in disgust.
As for engery policy… Shhhhyyyttttt… Don’t get me started. As some one who has done a little research in the alternative engery area… The R’s have thrown more money at it than the D’s in the last twenty years. But even that is not really a valid arguement when considering the amoutn of money it was. The R’s pushed “a drop in the bucket” kinda of money at it and the D’s pushed a little less than that. Don’t look to either for energy policy. The market will take care of that one on its own. So no… You can’t sell my on that point.
JM blathering about his tax holiday was only supposed to be a temporary thing to give some quick relief to some. It was never intended to be a long term strategy so that is not a valid arguement. And I even have to agree with the policy somewhat because even though oil has fallen I still hear and see people struggling to get to work (at least in the very short term)
As for the paritisanship… McCain was considered an under-dog from day one BECAUSE of his voting record AGAINST the republicans. Remember he has had a hell of a time courting the right and has been considered traitorous because he will not vote party lines. This is the one republican candidate that the democrats should be rooting for. I think he is the most moderate of the other R’s out there. As for Obama I think he would be more polarizing. In his defense I am sure that there are many schmuck R’s out there that would vote against him only because he is a D’s. I think the D’s would be more open minded to JM so you have so wiggle room there.
So inconclusion, you haven’t sold me yet. But I will do my homework that you have asked me to and google that.
I don’t believe that Obama is a flaming liberal lefty. I know that he is more moderate than that but I really think all this Camelot crap is dissaffecting (did I use the word correctly) and most of his team encourge him. I think without all the hype I could be more convinced but he really isn’t going to change the direction of this country dramatically and I am concerned with someone that would propagate that myth.
It is like Frodo said in books… “Some how I think the enemy would look fair and feel foul” to which Aragon replied “while I look foul and feel fair?”. That is how I feel about the two.
Gandalf I will reply when I have read that article chartible. I promised to keep an open mind and I will.
Take Care Piggs!
CE
CDMA ENG
ParticipantYeah I am with you on a lot of what you have said Grey Pilgrim. I did not like the Schivo thing either and when it comes to the whole Republican – Religious thing I am right with you in disgust.
As for engery policy… Shhhhyyyttttt… Don’t get me started. As some one who has done a little research in the alternative engery area… The R’s have thrown more money at it than the D’s in the last twenty years. But even that is not really a valid arguement when considering the amoutn of money it was. The R’s pushed “a drop in the bucket” kinda of money at it and the D’s pushed a little less than that. Don’t look to either for energy policy. The market will take care of that one on its own. So no… You can’t sell my on that point.
JM blathering about his tax holiday was only supposed to be a temporary thing to give some quick relief to some. It was never intended to be a long term strategy so that is not a valid arguement. And I even have to agree with the policy somewhat because even though oil has fallen I still hear and see people struggling to get to work (at least in the very short term)
As for the paritisanship… McCain was considered an under-dog from day one BECAUSE of his voting record AGAINST the republicans. Remember he has had a hell of a time courting the right and has been considered traitorous because he will not vote party lines. This is the one republican candidate that the democrats should be rooting for. I think he is the most moderate of the other R’s out there. As for Obama I think he would be more polarizing. In his defense I am sure that there are many schmuck R’s out there that would vote against him only because he is a D’s. I think the D’s would be more open minded to JM so you have so wiggle room there.
So inconclusion, you haven’t sold me yet. But I will do my homework that you have asked me to and google that.
I don’t believe that Obama is a flaming liberal lefty. I know that he is more moderate than that but I really think all this Camelot crap is dissaffecting (did I use the word correctly) and most of his team encourge him. I think without all the hype I could be more convinced but he really isn’t going to change the direction of this country dramatically and I am concerned with someone that would propagate that myth.
It is like Frodo said in books… “Some how I think the enemy would look fair and feel foul” to which Aragon replied “while I look foul and feel fair?”. That is how I feel about the two.
Gandalf I will reply when I have read that article chartible. I promised to keep an open mind and I will.
Take Care Piggs!
CE
CDMA ENG
ParticipantYeah I am with you on a lot of what you have said Grey Pilgrim. I did not like the Schivo thing either and when it comes to the whole Republican – Religious thing I am right with you in disgust.
As for engery policy… Shhhhyyyttttt… Don’t get me started. As some one who has done a little research in the alternative engery area… The R’s have thrown more money at it than the D’s in the last twenty years. But even that is not really a valid arguement when considering the amoutn of money it was. The R’s pushed “a drop in the bucket” kinda of money at it and the D’s pushed a little less than that. Don’t look to either for energy policy. The market will take care of that one on its own. So no… You can’t sell my on that point.
JM blathering about his tax holiday was only supposed to be a temporary thing to give some quick relief to some. It was never intended to be a long term strategy so that is not a valid arguement. And I even have to agree with the policy somewhat because even though oil has fallen I still hear and see people struggling to get to work (at least in the very short term)
As for the paritisanship… McCain was considered an under-dog from day one BECAUSE of his voting record AGAINST the republicans. Remember he has had a hell of a time courting the right and has been considered traitorous because he will not vote party lines. This is the one republican candidate that the democrats should be rooting for. I think he is the most moderate of the other R’s out there. As for Obama I think he would be more polarizing. In his defense I am sure that there are many schmuck R’s out there that would vote against him only because he is a D’s. I think the D’s would be more open minded to JM so you have so wiggle room there.
So inconclusion, you haven’t sold me yet. But I will do my homework that you have asked me to and google that.
I don’t believe that Obama is a flaming liberal lefty. I know that he is more moderate than that but I really think all this Camelot crap is dissaffecting (did I use the word correctly) and most of his team encourge him. I think without all the hype I could be more convinced but he really isn’t going to change the direction of this country dramatically and I am concerned with someone that would propagate that myth.
It is like Frodo said in books… “Some how I think the enemy would look fair and feel foul” to which Aragon replied “while I look foul and feel fair?”. That is how I feel about the two.
Gandalf I will reply when I have read that article chartible. I promised to keep an open mind and I will.
Take Care Piggs!
CE
CDMA ENG
ParticipantYeah I am with you on a lot of what you have said Grey Pilgrim. I did not like the Schivo thing either and when it comes to the whole Republican – Religious thing I am right with you in disgust.
As for engery policy… Shhhhyyyttttt… Don’t get me started. As some one who has done a little research in the alternative engery area… The R’s have thrown more money at it than the D’s in the last twenty years. But even that is not really a valid arguement when considering the amoutn of money it was. The R’s pushed “a drop in the bucket” kinda of money at it and the D’s pushed a little less than that. Don’t look to either for energy policy. The market will take care of that one on its own. So no… You can’t sell my on that point.
JM blathering about his tax holiday was only supposed to be a temporary thing to give some quick relief to some. It was never intended to be a long term strategy so that is not a valid arguement. And I even have to agree with the policy somewhat because even though oil has fallen I still hear and see people struggling to get to work (at least in the very short term)
As for the paritisanship… McCain was considered an under-dog from day one BECAUSE of his voting record AGAINST the republicans. Remember he has had a hell of a time courting the right and has been considered traitorous because he will not vote party lines. This is the one republican candidate that the democrats should be rooting for. I think he is the most moderate of the other R’s out there. As for Obama I think he would be more polarizing. In his defense I am sure that there are many schmuck R’s out there that would vote against him only because he is a D’s. I think the D’s would be more open minded to JM so you have so wiggle room there.
So inconclusion, you haven’t sold me yet. But I will do my homework that you have asked me to and google that.
I don’t believe that Obama is a flaming liberal lefty. I know that he is more moderate than that but I really think all this Camelot crap is dissaffecting (did I use the word correctly) and most of his team encourge him. I think without all the hype I could be more convinced but he really isn’t going to change the direction of this country dramatically and I am concerned with someone that would propagate that myth.
It is like Frodo said in books… “Some how I think the enemy would look fair and feel foul” to which Aragon replied “while I look foul and feel fair?”. That is how I feel about the two.
Gandalf I will reply when I have read that article chartible. I promised to keep an open mind and I will.
Take Care Piggs!
CE
CDMA ENG
ParticipantI would also be interested in hearing about his “new” ideals. McCain has a huge following and I ,for one, was willing to vote for a democratic president but it was neither of the big two. Every time I see that stupid sticker that says “hope” I cringe. What does he offer that earn that title? Please explain it to me.
Everytime I hear McCain is the next Bush it makes me cringe. Are these the only two platforms that he is running on? Hope and McCain = Bush. Please explain with a valid arguement and I will promise to have an open mind.
And while you are explaining I will provide the following accompainment. It was suited for Kennedy… Maybe good for Obama too…
It’s true! It’s true! The crown has made it clear.
The climate must be perfect all the year.A law was made a distant moon ago here:
July and August cannot be too hot.
And there’s a legal limit to the snow here
In Camelot.
The winter is forbidden till December
And exits March the second on the dot.
By order, summer lingers through September
In Camelot.
Camelot! Camelot!
I know it sounds a bit bizarre,
But in Camelot, Camelot
That’s how conditions are.
The rain may never fall till after sundown.
By eight, the morning fog must disappear.
In short, there’s simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In Camelot.Camelot! Camelot!
I know it gives a person pause,
But in Camelot, Camelot
Those are the legal laws.
The snow may never slush upon the hillside.
By nine p.m. the moonlight must appear.
In short, there’s simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In CamelotJust want a healthy dose of reality from our next president. Good know this one does know it…
Take Care People,
CE
CDMA ENG
ParticipantI would also be interested in hearing about his “new” ideals. McCain has a huge following and I ,for one, was willing to vote for a democratic president but it was neither of the big two. Every time I see that stupid sticker that says “hope” I cringe. What does he offer that earn that title? Please explain it to me.
Everytime I hear McCain is the next Bush it makes me cringe. Are these the only two platforms that he is running on? Hope and McCain = Bush. Please explain with a valid arguement and I will promise to have an open mind.
And while you are explaining I will provide the following accompainment. It was suited for Kennedy… Maybe good for Obama too…
It’s true! It’s true! The crown has made it clear.
The climate must be perfect all the year.A law was made a distant moon ago here:
July and August cannot be too hot.
And there’s a legal limit to the snow here
In Camelot.
The winter is forbidden till December
And exits March the second on the dot.
By order, summer lingers through September
In Camelot.
Camelot! Camelot!
I know it sounds a bit bizarre,
But in Camelot, Camelot
That’s how conditions are.
The rain may never fall till after sundown.
By eight, the morning fog must disappear.
In short, there’s simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In Camelot.Camelot! Camelot!
I know it gives a person pause,
But in Camelot, Camelot
Those are the legal laws.
The snow may never slush upon the hillside.
By nine p.m. the moonlight must appear.
In short, there’s simply not
A more congenial spot
For happily-ever-aftering than here
In CamelotJust want a healthy dose of reality from our next president. Good know this one does know it…
Take Care People,
CE
-
AuthorPosts
