[CBad]

[quote=NicMM]CBad, what kind of keyboard do you have? Do you recommend it?[/quote]

It’s a Yamaha YPG535 and yes I would recommend it. I inherited this from my brother (bought it for his daughter who ended up quitting). From my perspective it sounds great and has a pretty decent feel. The keys are semi weighted so it’s not as much like an acoustic as the pricier keyboards with fully weighted keys. It has a ton of features that I never use but my kids like playing around with them. The one feature I like is recording songs. My kids are good at learning by ear so they like me to play and record a song to help them learn it. Since this was given to me, I didn’t shop around and compare so I don’t know if I would have bought this particular one or not. But for what you need it for it will do the job.

[CBad]

[quote=flu]
CA is one bureaucratic state. There’s a bunch of self interest groups that will prevent most things from passing…And something does pass…It doesn’t matter anyway, because there’s always an opposition group that will just file a bunch of lawsuits to have it overturned by a judge anyway.
[/quote]

Ok, thanks for clarifying, I understand what you mean now.

[CBad]

[quote=flu]
CA is one bureaucratic state. There’s a bunch of self interest groups that will prevent most things from passing…And something does pass…It doesn’t matter anyway, because there’s always an opposition group that will just file a bunch of lawsuits to have it overturned by a judge anyway.
[/quote]

Ok, thanks for clarifying, I understand what you mean now.

[CBad]

[quote=flu]
CA is one bureaucratic state. There’s a bunch of self interest groups that will prevent most things from passing…And something does pass…It doesn’t matter anyway, because there’s always an opposition group that will just file a bunch of lawsuits to have it overturned by a judge anyway.
[/quote]

Ok, thanks for clarifying, I understand what you mean now.

[CBad]

[quote=flu]
CA is one bureaucratic state. There’s a bunch of self interest groups that will prevent most things from passing…And something does pass…It doesn’t matter anyway, because there’s always an opposition group that will just file a bunch of lawsuits to have it overturned by a judge anyway.
[/quote]

Ok, thanks for clarifying, I understand what you mean now.

[CBad]

[quote=flu]
CA is one bureaucratic state. There’s a bunch of self interest groups that will prevent most things from passing…And something does pass…It doesn’t matter anyway, because there’s always an opposition group that will just file a bunch of lawsuits to have it overturned by a judge anyway.
[/quote]

Ok, thanks for clarifying, I understand what you mean now.

[CBad]

Only in CA? I don’t understand that comment. It seems to me most laws that regulate personal choice originate in CA or NY. So I’m surprised this didn’t pass.

I didn’t see the merit in this ban for a few reasons. The biggest reason is that you have to wash reusable bags. Oh you don’t wash yours? It’s pretty obvious that the bag is a breeding ground for germs and there have been recent obvious studies backing this up showing they are carrying E. Coli and Salmonella. If everyone was forced to use them, how many people do you think would bother to wash them? How many people would not only not wash them but also leave them in their hot car for the next shopping trip? Then you have the germy thing handled back and forth by both the consumer and the cashier (adding new germs) and introduce food into that environment. I can see this becoming a big problem if consumers at large were forced to use them.

By the way, I use reusable bags almost all of the time but I do wash mine. And I wonder how much of the environment am I saving if I have to use water and energy on the darn thing?

[CBad]

Only in CA? I don’t understand that comment. It seems to me most laws that regulate personal choice originate in CA or NY. So I’m surprised this didn’t pass.

I didn’t see the merit in this ban for a few reasons. The biggest reason is that you have to wash reusable bags. Oh you don’t wash yours? It’s pretty obvious that the bag is a breeding ground for germs and there have been recent obvious studies backing this up showing they are carrying E. Coli and Salmonella. If everyone was forced to use them, how many people do you think would bother to wash them? How many people would not only not wash them but also leave them in their hot car for the next shopping trip? Then you have the germy thing handled back and forth by both the consumer and the cashier (adding new germs) and introduce food into that environment. I can see this becoming a big problem if consumers at large were forced to use them.

By the way, I use reusable bags almost all of the time but I do wash mine. And I wonder how much of the environment am I saving if I have to use water and energy on the darn thing?

[CBad]

Only in CA? I don’t understand that comment. It seems to me most laws that regulate personal choice originate in CA or NY. So I’m surprised this didn’t pass.

I didn’t see the merit in this ban for a few reasons. The biggest reason is that you have to wash reusable bags. Oh you don’t wash yours? It’s pretty obvious that the bag is a breeding ground for germs and there have been recent obvious studies backing this up showing they are carrying E. Coli and Salmonella. If everyone was forced to use them, how many people do you think would bother to wash them? How many people would not only not wash them but also leave them in their hot car for the next shopping trip? Then you have the germy thing handled back and forth by both the consumer and the cashier (adding new germs) and introduce food into that environment. I can see this becoming a big problem if consumers at large were forced to use them.

By the way, I use reusable bags almost all of the time but I do wash mine. And I wonder how much of the environment am I saving if I have to use water and energy on the darn thing?

[CBad]

Only in CA? I don’t understand that comment. It seems to me most laws that regulate personal choice originate in CA or NY. So I’m surprised this didn’t pass.

I didn’t see the merit in this ban for a few reasons. The biggest reason is that you have to wash reusable bags. Oh you don’t wash yours? It’s pretty obvious that the bag is a breeding ground for germs and there have been recent obvious studies backing this up showing they are carrying E. Coli and Salmonella. If everyone was forced to use them, how many people do you think would bother to wash them? How many people would not only not wash them but also leave them in their hot car for the next shopping trip? Then you have the germy thing handled back and forth by both the consumer and the cashier (adding new germs) and introduce food into that environment. I can see this becoming a big problem if consumers at large were forced to use them.

By the way, I use reusable bags almost all of the time but I do wash mine. And I wonder how much of the environment am I saving if I have to use water and energy on the darn thing?

[CBad]

Only in CA? I don’t understand that comment. It seems to me most laws that regulate personal choice originate in CA or NY. So I’m surprised this didn’t pass.

I didn’t see the merit in this ban for a few reasons. The biggest reason is that you have to wash reusable bags. Oh you don’t wash yours? It’s pretty obvious that the bag is a breeding ground for germs and there have been recent obvious studies backing this up showing they are carrying E. Coli and Salmonella. If everyone was forced to use them, how many people do you think would bother to wash them? How many people would not only not wash them but also leave them in their hot car for the next shopping trip? Then you have the germy thing handled back and forth by both the consumer and the cashier (adding new germs) and introduce food into that environment. I can see this becoming a big problem if consumers at large were forced to use them.

By the way, I use reusable bags almost all of the time but I do wash mine. And I wonder how much of the environment am I saving if I have to use water and energy on the darn thing?

[CBad]

We replaced all of ours several years ago and it’s truly one of the best aesthetic upgrades we’ve done in my opinion. As far as energy savings, not so much for us. We don’t use AC, don’t even have it and barely turn the heat on in the winter. So it didn’t change our utility bill but I’m sure it can affect others with higher utilization. It does help with furniture fading which is a plus. I also open/close all the windows daily and the new windows move like a dream compared to the old ones.

[CBad]

We replaced all of ours several years ago and it’s truly one of the best aesthetic upgrades we’ve done in my opinion. As far as energy savings, not so much for us. We don’t use AC, don’t even have it and barely turn the heat on in the winter. So it didn’t change our utility bill but I’m sure it can affect others with higher utilization. It does help with furniture fading which is a plus. I also open/close all the windows daily and the new windows move like a dream compared to the old ones.

[CBad]

We replaced all of ours several years ago and it’s truly one of the best aesthetic upgrades we’ve done in my opinion. As far as energy savings, not so much for us. We don’t use AC, don’t even have it and barely turn the heat on in the winter. So it didn’t change our utility bill but I’m sure it can affect others with higher utilization. It does help with furniture fading which is a plus. I also open/close all the windows daily and the new windows move like a dream compared to the old ones.

[CBad]

We replaced all of ours several years ago and it’s truly one of the best aesthetic upgrades we’ve done in my opinion. As far as energy savings, not so much for us. We don’t use AC, don’t even have it and barely turn the heat on in the winter. So it didn’t change our utility bill but I’m sure it can affect others with higher utilization. It does help with furniture fading which is a plus. I also open/close all the windows daily and the new windows move like a dream compared to the old ones.

[Author]

Posts