Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Casca
ParticipantTrying to slime McCain with Keating is the most distant of reaches. Unlike democrat icons Glenn and Cranston, McCain was the Senator from Keating’s home state. The only services provided by McCain were what might have been minimally expected as constituent services. The Senate Ethics Committee held McCain under the investigation for political cover, since the four senators who WERE owned by Keating were all democrats. All the while, the prosecutor wanted him released because he knew he was innocent. Of course none of this matters to democrats. Spin on with your lies. Certainly the truth won’t get you to the White House.
ParticipantTrying to slime McCain with Keating is the most distant of reaches. Unlike democrat icons Glenn and Cranston, McCain was the Senator from Keating’s home state. The only services provided by McCain were what might have been minimally expected as constituent services. The Senate Ethics Committee held McCain under the investigation for political cover, since the four senators who WERE owned by Keating were all democrats. All the while, the prosecutor wanted him released because he knew he was innocent. Of course none of this matters to democrats. Spin on with your lies. Certainly the truth won’t get you to the White House.
ParticipantTrying to slime McCain with Keating is the most distant of reaches. Unlike democrat icons Glenn and Cranston, McCain was the Senator from Keating’s home state. The only services provided by McCain were what might have been minimally expected as constituent services. The Senate Ethics Committee held McCain under the investigation for political cover, since the four senators who WERE owned by Keating were all democrats. All the while, the prosecutor wanted him released because he knew he was innocent. Of course none of this matters to democrats. Spin on with your lies. Certainly the truth won’t get you to the White House.
ParticipantTrying to slime McCain with Keating is the most distant of reaches. Unlike democrat icons Glenn and Cranston, McCain was the Senator from Keating’s home state. The only services provided by McCain were what might have been minimally expected as constituent services. The Senate Ethics Committee held McCain under the investigation for political cover, since the four senators who WERE owned by Keating were all democrats. All the while, the prosecutor wanted him released because he knew he was innocent. Of course none of this matters to democrats. Spin on with your lies. Certainly the truth won’t get you to the White House.
ParticipantThe class warfare nitwits are out in force. There’s not much that I’d agree with the Obamas on, but $250k a year isn’t rich. Technically it may be, but in reality it just isn’t all that much. I probably know a half dozen folks with more than $50 mil. Amazingly, they’re mostly liberal twits who dedicate their lives to tax avoidance.
BTW esmith, I take it back. You’re an idiot. Now go on out there, and eat the rich.
ParticipantThe class warfare nitwits are out in force. There’s not much that I’d agree with the Obamas on, but $250k a year isn’t rich. Technically it may be, but in reality it just isn’t all that much. I probably know a half dozen folks with more than $50 mil. Amazingly, they’re mostly liberal twits who dedicate their lives to tax avoidance.
BTW esmith, I take it back. You’re an idiot. Now go on out there, and eat the rich.
ParticipantThe class warfare nitwits are out in force. There’s not much that I’d agree with the Obamas on, but $250k a year isn’t rich. Technically it may be, but in reality it just isn’t all that much. I probably know a half dozen folks with more than $50 mil. Amazingly, they’re mostly liberal twits who dedicate their lives to tax avoidance.
BTW esmith, I take it back. You’re an idiot. Now go on out there, and eat the rich.
ParticipantThe class warfare nitwits are out in force. There’s not much that I’d agree with the Obamas on, but $250k a year isn’t rich. Technically it may be, but in reality it just isn’t all that much. I probably know a half dozen folks with more than $50 mil. Amazingly, they’re mostly liberal twits who dedicate their lives to tax avoidance.
BTW esmith, I take it back. You’re an idiot. Now go on out there, and eat the rich.
ParticipantThe class warfare nitwits are out in force. There’s not much that I’d agree with the Obamas on, but $250k a year isn’t rich. Technically it may be, but in reality it just isn’t all that much. I probably know a half dozen folks with more than $50 mil. Amazingly, they’re mostly liberal twits who dedicate their lives to tax avoidance.
BTW esmith, I take it back. You’re an idiot. Now go on out there, and eat the rich.
September 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM in reply to: Clinton, Republicans agree to deregulation of US financial system #273145Participant[quote=temeculaguy]All politicians are the same…[/quote]
TG, you’re obviously a very bright guy, but this sort of comment is at best intellectually lazy, and at worst simply ignorant. We live in a country where one party is entirely owned by identity politics, and totally incorrigible. The other is dominated by opportunists, but there are many good people there trying to do what is best for the Republic. That the polity as a whole is too indolent to participate meaningfully in the course we steer is the fault, and the pity.
September 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM in reply to: Clinton, Republicans agree to deregulation of US financial system #273392Participant[quote=temeculaguy]All politicians are the same…[/quote]
TG, you’re obviously a very bright guy, but this sort of comment is at best intellectually lazy, and at worst simply ignorant. We live in a country where one party is entirely owned by identity politics, and totally incorrigible. The other is dominated by opportunists, but there are many good people there trying to do what is best for the Republic. That the polity as a whole is too indolent to participate meaningfully in the course we steer is the fault, and the pity.
September 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM in reply to: Clinton, Republicans agree to deregulation of US financial system #273396Participant[quote=temeculaguy]All politicians are the same…[/quote]
TG, you’re obviously a very bright guy, but this sort of comment is at best intellectually lazy, and at worst simply ignorant. We live in a country where one party is entirely owned by identity politics, and totally incorrigible. The other is dominated by opportunists, but there are many good people there trying to do what is best for the Republic. That the polity as a whole is too indolent to participate meaningfully in the course we steer is the fault, and the pity.
September 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM in reply to: Clinton, Republicans agree to deregulation of US financial system #273439Participant[quote=temeculaguy]All politicians are the same…[/quote]
TG, you’re obviously a very bright guy, but this sort of comment is at best intellectually lazy, and at worst simply ignorant. We live in a country where one party is entirely owned by identity politics, and totally incorrigible. The other is dominated by opportunists, but there are many good people there trying to do what is best for the Republic. That the polity as a whole is too indolent to participate meaningfully in the course we steer is the fault, and the pity.
September 20, 2008 at 12:42 PM in reply to: Clinton, Republicans agree to deregulation of US financial system #273463Participant[quote=temeculaguy]All politicians are the same…[/quote]
TG, you’re obviously a very bright guy, but this sort of comment is at best intellectually lazy, and at worst simply ignorant. We live in a country where one party is entirely owned by identity politics, and totally incorrigible. The other is dominated by opportunists, but there are many good people there trying to do what is best for the Republic. That the polity as a whole is too indolent to participate meaningfully in the course we steer is the fault, and the pity.
-
AuthorPosts
