Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM in reply to: Hahahaha….how you like us now permabulls, RE cheerleaders, trolls, and e-ballers?!?! #134439January 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM in reply to: Hahahaha….how you like us now permabulls, RE cheerleaders, trolls, and e-ballers?!?! #134630
Bugs
ParticipantIf they were fortunate as an accident of birth and inherited their properties they were never part of the problem. Of course, they also aren’t the financial geniuses either.
January 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM in reply to: Hahahaha….how you like us now permabulls, RE cheerleaders, trolls, and e-ballers?!?! #134638ParticipantIf they were fortunate as an accident of birth and inherited their properties they were never part of the problem. Of course, they also aren’t the financial geniuses either.
January 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM in reply to: Hahahaha….how you like us now permabulls, RE cheerleaders, trolls, and e-ballers?!?! #134692ParticipantIf they were fortunate as an accident of birth and inherited their properties they were never part of the problem. Of course, they also aren’t the financial geniuses either.
January 11, 2008 at 3:35 PM in reply to: Hahahaha….how you like us now permabulls, RE cheerleaders, trolls, and e-ballers?!?! #134735ParticipantIf they were fortunate as an accident of birth and inherited their properties they were never part of the problem. Of course, they also aren’t the financial geniuses either.
ParticipantIt’s a function of the distribution of the data. Disparate datasets. A couple of the boosters even alluded to it without understanding its significance.
As far as I can tell the U-T editors either didn’t read the reporter’s notes or they did read them and they decided to rewrite the story so they could put that headline up.
ParticipantIt’s a function of the distribution of the data. Disparate datasets. A couple of the boosters even alluded to it without understanding its significance.
As far as I can tell the U-T editors either didn’t read the reporter’s notes or they did read them and they decided to rewrite the story so they could put that headline up.
ParticipantIt’s a function of the distribution of the data. Disparate datasets. A couple of the boosters even alluded to it without understanding its significance.
As far as I can tell the U-T editors either didn’t read the reporter’s notes or they did read them and they decided to rewrite the story so they could put that headline up.
ParticipantIt’s a function of the distribution of the data. Disparate datasets. A couple of the boosters even alluded to it without understanding its significance.
As far as I can tell the U-T editors either didn’t read the reporter’s notes or they did read them and they decided to rewrite the story so they could put that headline up.
ParticipantIt’s a function of the distribution of the data. Disparate datasets. A couple of the boosters even alluded to it without understanding its significance.
As far as I can tell the U-T editors either didn’t read the reporter’s notes or they did read them and they decided to rewrite the story so they could put that headline up.
ParticipantChula Vista is cutting back services. City of San Diego is cutting back services, the County is cutting back services. Now the state is cutting back services.
Does anyone see a pattern here? The political acceptability of cutting back services is moving up the governmental pecking order.
Before you know it, we’ll get a Presidential line-item veto along with some serious campaign contribution reform for Congress.
Or not.
ParticipantChula Vista is cutting back services. City of San Diego is cutting back services, the County is cutting back services. Now the state is cutting back services.
Does anyone see a pattern here? The political acceptability of cutting back services is moving up the governmental pecking order.
Before you know it, we’ll get a Presidential line-item veto along with some serious campaign contribution reform for Congress.
Or not.
ParticipantChula Vista is cutting back services. City of San Diego is cutting back services, the County is cutting back services. Now the state is cutting back services.
Does anyone see a pattern here? The political acceptability of cutting back services is moving up the governmental pecking order.
Before you know it, we’ll get a Presidential line-item veto along with some serious campaign contribution reform for Congress.
Or not.
ParticipantChula Vista is cutting back services. City of San Diego is cutting back services, the County is cutting back services. Now the state is cutting back services.
Does anyone see a pattern here? The political acceptability of cutting back services is moving up the governmental pecking order.
Before you know it, we’ll get a Presidential line-item veto along with some serious campaign contribution reform for Congress.
Or not.
ParticipantChula Vista is cutting back services. City of San Diego is cutting back services, the County is cutting back services. Now the state is cutting back services.
Does anyone see a pattern here? The political acceptability of cutting back services is moving up the governmental pecking order.
Before you know it, we’ll get a Presidential line-item veto along with some serious campaign contribution reform for Congress.
Or not.
-
AuthorPosts
