Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Bugs
ParticipantPerceptions count. Homes in the Rancho Santa Fe Covenant sell for 20+% more than do similar homes located outside the covenant area. Homes in the southern area of La Jolla’s 92037 zip area sell for 20% more than similar homes on the same hill but with the 92109 PB zip.
If you’re buying for shelter San Elijo is probably the better buy. If you’re buying for resale then Carillo Ranch might be the better choice.
ParticipantPerceptions count. Homes in the Rancho Santa Fe Covenant sell for 20+% more than do similar homes located outside the covenant area. Homes in the southern area of La Jolla’s 92037 zip area sell for 20% more than similar homes on the same hill but with the 92109 PB zip.
If you’re buying for shelter San Elijo is probably the better buy. If you’re buying for resale then Carillo Ranch might be the better choice.
ParticipantPerceptions count. Homes in the Rancho Santa Fe Covenant sell for 20+% more than do similar homes located outside the covenant area. Homes in the southern area of La Jolla’s 92037 zip area sell for 20% more than similar homes on the same hill but with the 92109 PB zip.
If you’re buying for shelter San Elijo is probably the better buy. If you’re buying for resale then Carillo Ranch might be the better choice.
ParticipantPerceptions count. Homes in the Rancho Santa Fe Covenant sell for 20+% more than do similar homes located outside the covenant area. Homes in the southern area of La Jolla’s 92037 zip area sell for 20% more than similar homes on the same hill but with the 92109 PB zip.
If you’re buying for shelter San Elijo is probably the better buy. If you’re buying for resale then Carillo Ranch might be the better choice.
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
ParticipantChances are pretty good that they didn’t sell at a loss like this because they wanted to or that they had other options. They were probably forced to sell, in which case there were no alternatives at all.
And no, a wage earner doesn’t come back to pay off a $100k+ shortfall; they go BK and start over.
ParticipantMP,
You do know that I’m an appraiser, right? The reason I can’t comment on specifics is because it would be unethical for me to do so.
ParticipantMP,
You do know that I’m an appraiser, right? The reason I can’t comment on specifics is because it would be unethical for me to do so.
ParticipantMP,
You do know that I’m an appraiser, right? The reason I can’t comment on specifics is because it would be unethical for me to do so.
ParticipantMP,
You do know that I’m an appraiser, right? The reason I can’t comment on specifics is because it would be unethical for me to do so.
ParticipantMP,
You do know that I’m an appraiser, right? The reason I can’t comment on specifics is because it would be unethical for me to do so.
-
AuthorPosts
