[bob2007]

Find an excuse to work in your front yard or garage. I’m always amazed at how the neighbors take that opportunity to talk. The fact that everyone there purposely bought behind a gate is one strike against you.

The individual makes a big difference. We have lived in 3 places here in SD over 15 years. In each place we found the neighbors to be very nice once the ice is broken. In the current, and hopefully last, location we know everyone on the street, always wave and talk.

[bob2007]

Find an excuse to work in your front yard or garage. I’m always amazed at how the neighbors take that opportunity to talk. The fact that everyone there purposely bought behind a gate is one strike against you.

The individual makes a big difference. We have lived in 3 places here in SD over 15 years. In each place we found the neighbors to be very nice once the ice is broken. In the current, and hopefully last, location we know everyone on the street, always wave and talk.

[bob2007]

I’m not in that range, but I do aspire to be. A couple thoughts come to mind:

1. Those who are not affected usually think its a great idea, and are voting on what to do with other peoples money. That sucks.

2. If you are making more than $250k and think it is a good idea, then there is nothing stopping you right now if you want to contribute more. If is is such a good thing to do, why do you need a law to make you do it?

3. I agree with the post that said you can’t tax your way out of this. The way to make this country stronger is to generate things of value, not spend. If you don’t reward those who generate things of value (penalize them instead with tax) it won’t work.

4. Any business with more than 1 or 2 people needs cash reserves well in excess of $250k, so taxing above that amount does have an effect.

5. Those that are wealthy above the $2M mark usually have more options for avoiding tax. So the burden will be put more on the small business
owners than the larger corporations.

[bob2007]

I’m not in that range, but I do aspire to be. A couple thoughts come to mind:

1. Those who are not affected usually think its a great idea, and are voting on what to do with other peoples money. That sucks.

2. If you are making more than $250k and think it is a good idea, then there is nothing stopping you right now if you want to contribute more. If is is such a good thing to do, why do you need a law to make you do it?

3. I agree with the post that said you can’t tax your way out of this. The way to make this country stronger is to generate things of value, not spend. If you don’t reward those who generate things of value (penalize them instead with tax) it won’t work.

4. Any business with more than 1 or 2 people needs cash reserves well in excess of $250k, so taxing above that amount does have an effect.

5. Those that are wealthy above the $2M mark usually have more options for avoiding tax. So the burden will be put more on the small business
owners than the larger corporations.

[bob2007]

I’m not in that range, but I do aspire to be. A couple thoughts come to mind:

1. Those who are not affected usually think its a great idea, and are voting on what to do with other peoples money. That sucks.

2. If you are making more than $250k and think it is a good idea, then there is nothing stopping you right now if you want to contribute more. If is is such a good thing to do, why do you need a law to make you do it?

3. I agree with the post that said you can’t tax your way out of this. The way to make this country stronger is to generate things of value, not spend. If you don’t reward those who generate things of value (penalize them instead with tax) it won’t work.

4. Any business with more than 1 or 2 people needs cash reserves well in excess of $250k, so taxing above that amount does have an effect.

5. Those that are wealthy above the $2M mark usually have more options for avoiding tax. So the burden will be put more on the small business
owners than the larger corporations.

[bob2007]

I’m not in that range, but I do aspire to be. A couple thoughts come to mind:

1. Those who are not affected usually think its a great idea, and are voting on what to do with other peoples money. That sucks.

2. If you are making more than $250k and think it is a good idea, then there is nothing stopping you right now if you want to contribute more. If is is such a good thing to do, why do you need a law to make you do it?

3. I agree with the post that said you can’t tax your way out of this. The way to make this country stronger is to generate things of value, not spend. If you don’t reward those who generate things of value (penalize them instead with tax) it won’t work.

4. Any business with more than 1 or 2 people needs cash reserves well in excess of $250k, so taxing above that amount does have an effect.

5. Those that are wealthy above the $2M mark usually have more options for avoiding tax. So the burden will be put more on the small business
owners than the larger corporations.

[bob2007]

I’m not in that range, but I do aspire to be. A couple thoughts come to mind:

1. Those who are not affected usually think its a great idea, and are voting on what to do with other peoples money. That sucks.

2. If you are making more than $250k and think it is a good idea, then there is nothing stopping you right now if you want to contribute more. If is is such a good thing to do, why do you need a law to make you do it?

3. I agree with the post that said you can’t tax your way out of this. The way to make this country stronger is to generate things of value, not spend. If you don’t reward those who generate things of value (penalize them instead with tax) it won’t work.

4. Any business with more than 1 or 2 people needs cash reserves well in excess of $250k, so taxing above that amount does have an effect.

5. Those that are wealthy above the $2M mark usually have more options for avoiding tax. So the burden will be put more on the small business
owners than the larger corporations.

[bob2007]

Thanks for posting this information. He can claim things changed from the time he wrote his book, but the fact he is losing money proves the point because he can adjust is investments to market conditions.

[bob2007]

Thanks for posting this information. He can claim things changed from the time he wrote his book, but the fact he is losing money proves the point because he can adjust is investments to market conditions.

[bob2007]

Thanks for posting this information. He can claim things changed from the time he wrote his book, but the fact he is losing money proves the point because he can adjust is investments to market conditions.

[bob2007]

Thanks for posting this information. He can claim things changed from the time he wrote his book, but the fact he is losing money proves the point because he can adjust is investments to market conditions.

[bob2007]

Thanks for posting this information. He can claim things changed from the time he wrote his book, but the fact he is losing money proves the point because he can adjust is investments to market conditions.

[bob2007]

This is the way it used to be, and should be now.

[bob2007]

This is the way it used to be, and should be now.

[bob2007]

This is the way it used to be, and should be now.

[Author]

Posts