Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
BigGovernmentIsGood
Participant[quote=davelj]I spend three days a month in New Orleans. Louisiana has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the U.S. And I’ve been eating copious amounts of seafood before, during and after the Oil Spill to zero ill effect. Don’t get me wrong, no oil spills are preferable to oil spills. But I’m not overly concerned about the long-term effects.[/quote]
Hmmmm …. Here are some recent headlines from the Florida Oil Spill Law blog:
ALERT: Florida medical doctor begins “treating patients in relation to high levels of volatile solvents in the blood stream” — “Tremendous implications”
Desparation: “Local economy will completely collapse” without help soon — “Going to be true devastation” (VIDEO)
Crab containing 8,815 ppm of hydrocarbons had NO smell or sight of oil — “We were astonished there were levels like that”
University scientist’s seafood sample results were “hundreds of times higher than the levels the government tests found”
TV report on shrimp with nearly 200 ppm oil in digestive system (VIDEO)
LSU professor: Crude oil in seafood NOT detectable by ‘smell test’ — “We are being lied to”
Single mother of two young children on third job around Gulf since blowout — “Everything’s going bankrupt” …more (VIDEO)
193 ppm of oil found inside shrimp purchased on Oct. 22 (Lab Results)
Fish organs are NOT the same color as they used to be, says BP/P2S worker — “You cut them open and they’re not the same” (VIDEO)
Chemist: Women more at risk — “Bleeding from their vagina and anus. Small kids are bleeding from their ears. This stuff is busting red blood cells”
“They are dying” says registered nurse working in Florida — I’m seeing “people who have been chemically poisoned”
“They are literally shrimping in oil” says eyewitness — “It’s criminal” that officials keep waters open
http://www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/
Enjoy that seafood. And let’s check back on that Louisiana unemployment rate in a few months.
Participant[quote=davelj]I spend three days a month in New Orleans. Louisiana has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the U.S. And I’ve been eating copious amounts of seafood before, during and after the Oil Spill to zero ill effect. Don’t get me wrong, no oil spills are preferable to oil spills. But I’m not overly concerned about the long-term effects.[/quote]
Hmmmm …. Here are some recent headlines from the Florida Oil Spill Law blog:
ALERT: Florida medical doctor begins “treating patients in relation to high levels of volatile solvents in the blood stream” — “Tremendous implications”
Desparation: “Local economy will completely collapse” without help soon — “Going to be true devastation” (VIDEO)
Crab containing 8,815 ppm of hydrocarbons had NO smell or sight of oil — “We were astonished there were levels like that”
University scientist’s seafood sample results were “hundreds of times higher than the levels the government tests found”
TV report on shrimp with nearly 200 ppm oil in digestive system (VIDEO)
LSU professor: Crude oil in seafood NOT detectable by ‘smell test’ — “We are being lied to”
Single mother of two young children on third job around Gulf since blowout — “Everything’s going bankrupt” …more (VIDEO)
193 ppm of oil found inside shrimp purchased on Oct. 22 (Lab Results)
Fish organs are NOT the same color as they used to be, says BP/P2S worker — “You cut them open and they’re not the same” (VIDEO)
Chemist: Women more at risk — “Bleeding from their vagina and anus. Small kids are bleeding from their ears. This stuff is busting red blood cells”
“They are dying” says registered nurse working in Florida — I’m seeing “people who have been chemically poisoned”
“They are literally shrimping in oil” says eyewitness — “It’s criminal” that officials keep waters open
http://www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/
Enjoy that seafood. And let’s check back on that Louisiana unemployment rate in a few months.
Participant[quote=davelj]I spend three days a month in New Orleans. Louisiana has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the U.S. And I’ve been eating copious amounts of seafood before, during and after the Oil Spill to zero ill effect. Don’t get me wrong, no oil spills are preferable to oil spills. But I’m not overly concerned about the long-term effects.[/quote]
Hmmmm …. Here are some recent headlines from the Florida Oil Spill Law blog:
ALERT: Florida medical doctor begins “treating patients in relation to high levels of volatile solvents in the blood stream” — “Tremendous implications”
Desparation: “Local economy will completely collapse” without help soon — “Going to be true devastation” (VIDEO)
Crab containing 8,815 ppm of hydrocarbons had NO smell or sight of oil — “We were astonished there were levels like that”
University scientist’s seafood sample results were “hundreds of times higher than the levels the government tests found”
TV report on shrimp with nearly 200 ppm oil in digestive system (VIDEO)
LSU professor: Crude oil in seafood NOT detectable by ‘smell test’ — “We are being lied to”
Single mother of two young children on third job around Gulf since blowout — “Everything’s going bankrupt” …more (VIDEO)
193 ppm of oil found inside shrimp purchased on Oct. 22 (Lab Results)
Fish organs are NOT the same color as they used to be, says BP/P2S worker — “You cut them open and they’re not the same” (VIDEO)
Chemist: Women more at risk — “Bleeding from their vagina and anus. Small kids are bleeding from their ears. This stuff is busting red blood cells”
“They are dying” says registered nurse working in Florida — I’m seeing “people who have been chemically poisoned”
“They are literally shrimping in oil” says eyewitness — “It’s criminal” that officials keep waters open
http://www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/
Enjoy that seafood. And let’s check back on that Louisiana unemployment rate in a few months.
Participant[quote=davelj]I spend three days a month in New Orleans. Louisiana has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the U.S. And I’ve been eating copious amounts of seafood before, during and after the Oil Spill to zero ill effect. Don’t get me wrong, no oil spills are preferable to oil spills. But I’m not overly concerned about the long-term effects.[/quote]
Hmmmm …. Here are some recent headlines from the Florida Oil Spill Law blog:
ALERT: Florida medical doctor begins “treating patients in relation to high levels of volatile solvents in the blood stream” — “Tremendous implications”
Desparation: “Local economy will completely collapse” without help soon — “Going to be true devastation” (VIDEO)
Crab containing 8,815 ppm of hydrocarbons had NO smell or sight of oil — “We were astonished there were levels like that”
University scientist’s seafood sample results were “hundreds of times higher than the levels the government tests found”
TV report on shrimp with nearly 200 ppm oil in digestive system (VIDEO)
LSU professor: Crude oil in seafood NOT detectable by ‘smell test’ — “We are being lied to”
Single mother of two young children on third job around Gulf since blowout — “Everything’s going bankrupt” …more (VIDEO)
193 ppm of oil found inside shrimp purchased on Oct. 22 (Lab Results)
Fish organs are NOT the same color as they used to be, says BP/P2S worker — “You cut them open and they’re not the same” (VIDEO)
Chemist: Women more at risk — “Bleeding from their vagina and anus. Small kids are bleeding from their ears. This stuff is busting red blood cells”
“They are dying” says registered nurse working in Florida — I’m seeing “people who have been chemically poisoned”
“They are literally shrimping in oil” says eyewitness — “It’s criminal” that officials keep waters open
http://www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/
Enjoy that seafood. And let’s check back on that Louisiana unemployment rate in a few months.
ParticipantGreetings close-minded idealogues! What a fabulous day this is! Proposition 23 was not just defeated, it was destroyed.
The big, evil, dirty, Texas oil companies are on the run. I guess they even got word that all it took to turn a California voter against Proposition 23 was to tell them that the Prop was funded by BIG-EVIL-DIRTY Texas oil:
By the end of September, grassroots activists had successfully turned voters against the measure by branding the Yes on 23 campaign as being bought and paid for by the Texas oil companies, which prompted the oil companies to go on the defensive and freeze all funding to the campaign.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/02/grassroots-no-on-prop-23-_n_777785.html?ir=Los+Angeles
I participated in several calling parties that helped to turn the tide (quite massively, I might add) against Proposition 23. It was a great feeling telling voters about who was really behind Proposition 23 and using the oil company donations against them.
We can now all look forward to a cleaner, greener California with gobs of green energy jobs for all. You’re Welcome.
ParticipantGreetings close-minded idealogues! What a fabulous day this is! Proposition 23 was not just defeated, it was destroyed.
The big, evil, dirty, Texas oil companies are on the run. I guess they even got word that all it took to turn a California voter against Proposition 23 was to tell them that the Prop was funded by BIG-EVIL-DIRTY Texas oil:
By the end of September, grassroots activists had successfully turned voters against the measure by branding the Yes on 23 campaign as being bought and paid for by the Texas oil companies, which prompted the oil companies to go on the defensive and freeze all funding to the campaign.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/02/grassroots-no-on-prop-23-_n_777785.html?ir=Los+Angeles
I participated in several calling parties that helped to turn the tide (quite massively, I might add) against Proposition 23. It was a great feeling telling voters about who was really behind Proposition 23 and using the oil company donations against them.
We can now all look forward to a cleaner, greener California with gobs of green energy jobs for all. You’re Welcome.
ParticipantGreetings close-minded idealogues! What a fabulous day this is! Proposition 23 was not just defeated, it was destroyed.
The big, evil, dirty, Texas oil companies are on the run. I guess they even got word that all it took to turn a California voter against Proposition 23 was to tell them that the Prop was funded by BIG-EVIL-DIRTY Texas oil:
By the end of September, grassroots activists had successfully turned voters against the measure by branding the Yes on 23 campaign as being bought and paid for by the Texas oil companies, which prompted the oil companies to go on the defensive and freeze all funding to the campaign.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/02/grassroots-no-on-prop-23-_n_777785.html?ir=Los+Angeles
I participated in several calling parties that helped to turn the tide (quite massively, I might add) against Proposition 23. It was a great feeling telling voters about who was really behind Proposition 23 and using the oil company donations against them.
We can now all look forward to a cleaner, greener California with gobs of green energy jobs for all. You’re Welcome.
ParticipantGreetings close-minded idealogues! What a fabulous day this is! Proposition 23 was not just defeated, it was destroyed.
The big, evil, dirty, Texas oil companies are on the run. I guess they even got word that all it took to turn a California voter against Proposition 23 was to tell them that the Prop was funded by BIG-EVIL-DIRTY Texas oil:
By the end of September, grassroots activists had successfully turned voters against the measure by branding the Yes on 23 campaign as being bought and paid for by the Texas oil companies, which prompted the oil companies to go on the defensive and freeze all funding to the campaign.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/02/grassroots-no-on-prop-23-_n_777785.html?ir=Los+Angeles
I participated in several calling parties that helped to turn the tide (quite massively, I might add) against Proposition 23. It was a great feeling telling voters about who was really behind Proposition 23 and using the oil company donations against them.
We can now all look forward to a cleaner, greener California with gobs of green energy jobs for all. You’re Welcome.
ParticipantGreetings close-minded idealogues! What a fabulous day this is! Proposition 23 was not just defeated, it was destroyed.
The big, evil, dirty, Texas oil companies are on the run. I guess they even got word that all it took to turn a California voter against Proposition 23 was to tell them that the Prop was funded by BIG-EVIL-DIRTY Texas oil:
By the end of September, grassroots activists had successfully turned voters against the measure by branding the Yes on 23 campaign as being bought and paid for by the Texas oil companies, which prompted the oil companies to go on the defensive and freeze all funding to the campaign.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/02/grassroots-no-on-prop-23-_n_777785.html?ir=Los+Angeles
I participated in several calling parties that helped to turn the tide (quite massively, I might add) against Proposition 23. It was a great feeling telling voters about who was really behind Proposition 23 and using the oil company donations against them.
We can now all look forward to a cleaner, greener California with gobs of green energy jobs for all. You’re Welcome.
Participantparamount,
Question: Would you prefer to see massive tax cuts for the richest 2% of Americans leading to eventual bankruptcy of the government or wage increases for your fellow workers?
Those are basically your two choices. Republicans like to pay lip service to cutting spending, but no government ever has cut spending. It’s not going to happen. So a vote for Republicans is basically a vote for massive tax cuts for the rich which will lead to massive budget deficits and eventual bankrupting of the government.
On the other side, you have the Democrats who are in the back pocket of the unions. Unions are great for all workers. When union wages go up, that puts pressure on non-union employers to raise wages.
I prefer to vote for the corrupt party that is on the side of the working man as opposed to the corrupt party that only cares about the richest 2% of Americans.
Participantparamount,
Question: Would you prefer to see massive tax cuts for the richest 2% of Americans leading to eventual bankruptcy of the government or wage increases for your fellow workers?
Those are basically your two choices. Republicans like to pay lip service to cutting spending, but no government ever has cut spending. It’s not going to happen. So a vote for Republicans is basically a vote for massive tax cuts for the rich which will lead to massive budget deficits and eventual bankrupting of the government.
On the other side, you have the Democrats who are in the back pocket of the unions. Unions are great for all workers. When union wages go up, that puts pressure on non-union employers to raise wages.
I prefer to vote for the corrupt party that is on the side of the working man as opposed to the corrupt party that only cares about the richest 2% of Americans.
Participantparamount,
Question: Would you prefer to see massive tax cuts for the richest 2% of Americans leading to eventual bankruptcy of the government or wage increases for your fellow workers?
Those are basically your two choices. Republicans like to pay lip service to cutting spending, but no government ever has cut spending. It’s not going to happen. So a vote for Republicans is basically a vote for massive tax cuts for the rich which will lead to massive budget deficits and eventual bankrupting of the government.
On the other side, you have the Democrats who are in the back pocket of the unions. Unions are great for all workers. When union wages go up, that puts pressure on non-union employers to raise wages.
I prefer to vote for the corrupt party that is on the side of the working man as opposed to the corrupt party that only cares about the richest 2% of Americans.
Participantparamount,
Question: Would you prefer to see massive tax cuts for the richest 2% of Americans leading to eventual bankruptcy of the government or wage increases for your fellow workers?
Those are basically your two choices. Republicans like to pay lip service to cutting spending, but no government ever has cut spending. It’s not going to happen. So a vote for Republicans is basically a vote for massive tax cuts for the rich which will lead to massive budget deficits and eventual bankrupting of the government.
On the other side, you have the Democrats who are in the back pocket of the unions. Unions are great for all workers. When union wages go up, that puts pressure on non-union employers to raise wages.
I prefer to vote for the corrupt party that is on the side of the working man as opposed to the corrupt party that only cares about the richest 2% of Americans.
Participantparamount,
Question: Would you prefer to see massive tax cuts for the richest 2% of Americans leading to eventual bankruptcy of the government or wage increases for your fellow workers?
Those are basically your two choices. Republicans like to pay lip service to cutting spending, but no government ever has cut spending. It’s not going to happen. So a vote for Republicans is basically a vote for massive tax cuts for the rich which will lead to massive budget deficits and eventual bankrupting of the government.
On the other side, you have the Democrats who are in the back pocket of the unions. Unions are great for all workers. When union wages go up, that puts pressure on non-union employers to raise wages.
I prefer to vote for the corrupt party that is on the side of the working man as opposed to the corrupt party that only cares about the richest 2% of Americans.
-
AuthorPosts
