Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
bearishgurl
Participant[quote=spdrun]Not really. Just download the GWX tool that blocks this filth.[/quote]
Yes, I saw your link, spdrun. I guess downloading and installing your link is preferable to downgrading my laptop to Win Vista. I have full licenses of Win XP Professional and Vista Premium in my name but the Win 7 Premium was preloaded in my laptop prior to purchase. If I get rid of it, I may not be able to get it back.I like Win 7 the best of the three and Win Vista the least.
Participant[quote=paramount][quote=spdrun]
Nope. They may force download of this item of spyware as an update, but installation would still require some sort of manual intervention. 7 is supported until at least 2019.[/quote]
I agree 100% with you and BG – part of the reason for this push is spyware.
Happy using Windows 7 or Windows 8? You might not be happy much longer, because Microsoft has announced Windows 10 will now start installing automatically on Windows 7 and Windows 8 PCs…
The development sees Microsoft follow through on its controversial October roadmap which said Windows 10 would have its status changed in 2016 to become a ‘Recommended’ upgrade in Windows Update. In basic terms this means anyone who uses Windows 7 or Windows 8 with default Windows Update settings (the vast majority) will now see Windows 10 begin installing by itself.
The good news is Windows 7 and Windows 8 users will still have the power to interrupt the installation once it has started, but this still represents by far the most aggressive measure Microsoft has taken to achieve its stated goal of one billion Windows 10 installations by 2017.[/quote]
Well, it looks like it might getting close to the time where I’ll have to schedule the WIN “updates” on my WIN 7 computer to notify me first before downloading. My (late 2009) laptop is my only computer using WIN 7 and it is not my main computer. I mainly use it for traveling and decided after my last trip that I will get my own (private) wifi for it when/if I should take it on another long trip as I have had some issues in the past with semi-public wifis (such as hotels, etc).
Participant[quote=Blogstar]EPA might not be unconstitutional but it can be so extreme in power grabs that it seems like it should be.[/quote]I think that the various environmental agencies in SD County should have been more thorough in their studies of the environmental impact at the base of Mt Miguel and southward. As it stands, it is now full of (mostly tightly packed) residential development from the Sweetwater Reservoir all the way down to nearly the northern edge of Brown Field (about 8-9 miles, including the west/southwest sides of the base of the transmitter) as a result of the residential “building spree” of the early/mid ’00’s.
These unwise choices have caused the coyote population living out there to run scared into town. By the time they are able to successfully sprint into my (urban) area 9-10 miles west (near SD Bay), they are emaciated, thirsty and starving. Several small pets of my neighbors have been killed while in their front yards … even tied up (one small dog was killed right in front of its owner)! I’ve helped their distraught owners transport and bury three of these pet bodies where there was just basically eyes, spine and a few entrials left, if that. It’s really sad that Big Development has been allowed to essentially destroy the habitat of these wild animals only to add to the headaches and congestion of the area with overbuilding. These bad decisions also led to gross overpopulation and lack of safety for the pets of those residents of even the long-established areas.
We have only our “esteemed” greedy (and corrupt) leaders to thank for this travesty.
Participant[quote=spdrun] . . . (Some are even stuck on XP due to compatibility issues.)[/quote]This is why I still have one computer running XP. It can run WinVista but then I would have compatibility issues with the specialized business software I need on it, which is very, very costly to upgrade.
Participant[quote=spdrun]
It is my understanding that Microsoft will be FORCING Windows 7 users to update to Windows 10!!!
Nope. They may force download of this item of spyware as an update, but installation would still require some sort of manual intervention. 7 is supported until at least 2019.
A truly automated update process would result in a lot of software that would suddenly not work and lawsuits. (e.g. any Quickbooks older than 2015)
Also, there’s an easy way to block Win 10 installation entirely — GWX Control Panel which can be downloaded here:
http://ultimateoutsider.com/downloads/
In short: shove Windows 10 up your raw arsehole, Satan Nadella. I’ll update when I’m good and fucking ready.
Oh, and my next “upgrade” will be to Ubuntu if/when Win 7 is no longer supported.[/quote]Thanks for the tips, spdrun!
Participant[quote=Blogstar][quote=FlyerInHi][quote=Blogstar]I’ll be o.k. if I can just get a discount code and maybe free shipping on the new security gate from Walmart.
That looks like the entrance to a nice estate.[/quote]
Maybe it’s not the right gate then.
I like this one. http://www.alekoproducts.com/Paris-Swing-Dual-Iron-Driveway-Pedestrian-Gate-p/set16x4pard-ap.htm
The little side gate would be useful.[/quote]Those are very nice gates, blogstar …. both of them!
Participant[quote=paramount][quote=scaredyclassic]
Watches are a,liability, require maintenance.
I did buy some mac stuff recently, even a desktop.
But the last mac we had for 7 years.[/quote]
Speaking of Mac and PC
**WARNING WARNING WARNING**
It is my understanding that Microsoft will be FORCING Windows 7 users to update to Windows 10!!![/quote]If this happens, I’ll use the older WIN 7/Vista/XP “unsupported” and keep on keepin’ on (with a locked up router and updated malwarebytes and anti-virus). The older operating systems should work a few more years before completely crashing beyond repair. I’m still running one computer successfully on Win XP, which is no longer supported, but don’t go on the internet much with it. If the time comes where Win XP to Win 7 is no longer useable (should happen staggered over years), I’ll switch to Linux or get a Mac. I’ve got a decent older version of Linux Red Hat which will work on at least my oldest computer (heavy Pentium III MMX circa 2000). It still has all sizes of SCSI available as well as a SCSI hard drive!
I’m not running any OS full of spyware. Period.
Participant[quote=njtosd][quote=bearishgurl]This timely chart was in my e-mail this morning:
http://journal.firsttuesday.us/wp-content/uploads/Buyer-Seller-Breach.png%5B/quote%5D
Thanks BG-but this chart relates to situations where an enforceable contract is in place. You can’t breach a contract until it exists. The question is when does the contract come into being. To summarize-if the buyer can walk away at any time until the contingencies are removed, it’s not a real contract. The Steiner case sort of suggests that if the buyer can walk away then the seller should be able to walk away too. Once the buyer can’t walk away then there is consideration and an enforceable contract comes into being. I am not saying this is settled law. It could be that court could find consideration in the money and time the buyer puts into removing contingencies. I just think it’s a good idea for the buyer to give the seller a certain amount of money that is itrevocable so that there is consideration on the buyers part. Can’t hurt.[/quote]Yeah, I like the idea of the $100 set aside for that purpose.
A buyer whose seller backed out “could” have their own house in escrow and some or all of their stuff in storage. They also could have given notice for the rental they are occupying and a new tenant had already been found by their LL, esp in most urban coastal areas of CA where the vacancy rate is <=3%. The buyer could also have money wrapped up in a physical inspection and/or engineer's report and have a rate lock that is soon to expire. So the buyer can be "damaged" if their seller pulls this stunt. I'm just wondering if a hundred or a few hundred non-refundable deposit from a buyer plus the buyer insisting on that extra language in the contract (as suggested in your link) might deter some sellers from accepting their offer ... especially if their listed property lies in an area with a critical shortage of housing, such as Silicon Valley. Maybe some of these sellers are so cocky that they think qualified buyers who will "overpay" for their property are a dime a dozen.
ParticipantA seller backing out at the eleventh hour should be required to pay their buyer liquidated damages IF that buyer did everything they were supposed to in a timely manner during escrow to purchase their property. Those actual damages will vary wildly from buyer to buyer.
ParticipantThis timely chart was in my e-mail this morning:
http://journal.firsttuesday.us/wp-content/uploads/Buyer-Seller-Breach.png
Participant[quote=Blogstar]Thanks for the info: I doubt I’ll try to go limited scope representation. I am leaning toward giving a solid firm some money to do all those steps gzz outlined.[/quote]I was just reminding you that with a Limited Scope Representation retainer agreement, you will typically be quoted a flat rate for agreed upon tasks. You had mentioned today, I believe, that you were interested in getting a flat rate quote and in my experience, that is one way to compel attorneys to work for a flat rate. Many will not even entertain this idea.
Participant[quote=FlyerInHi]”Husband and Wife, as Community Property with Right of Survivorship”
I was just talking to friends over dinner earlier.
Has anyone seen a deed for a gay couple? How do they word it? Wife and wife, husband and husband?[/quote]That’s a good question, FIH, but I suspect it’s still the same language in CA. I’ve seen a gay wedding on TV and the officiant still used the language, “I now pronounce you husband and wife,” as in “his husband” or “her wife.”Actual gender of the parties has nothing to do with it.
Participant[quote=FlyerInHi]The seller lives out of state. He just has 2 investment properties in this county.
Nothing with their names (he and his wife)
He’s owned them for a long time. He didn’t tell me anything but I believe he answered the title questionnaire which caused title not to want to write a policy.[/quote]Deep red FLAG (maroon, actually) :=0
Participant[quote=FlyerInHi]I got the prelim from the title officer. it’s a day old.
The property is in escrow. The seller is about to file for bankruptcy I believe, and he’s in talks with his bankruptcy attorney. Of course, there’s more that I’m not privy to.I think this is a case where spdrun would say the seller is stupid in that there’s no need to tell title/escrow what they can’t find out by themselves.
It looks like a deal to me for I can’t foresee anyone bringing suit to get title, and successfully doing so. If anything, any claimant would only be entitled to a share of the proceed of the sale.[/quote]Did you check the civil and domestic (court) registers in your county for the seller’s name, FIH? Is/was the seller party to suit that is about to conclude or has recently concluded? If so, have you seen the judgment?
You do realize that there is a waiting period (varies by state) before a judgment creditor can take legal action to collect their judgment, right?
You didn’t state if the seller had always owned the property by themselves or if it was quitclaimed to them as sole owner at some point.
Since your seller told you he/she was considering filing for BK protection, have you asked them why they are finding it necessary to consider that? Are you sure they haven’t already filed? If they waffle the answer to this question or refuse to discuss it with you, that is a “red flag” indicating they have something to hide from you.
The fact that they are contemplating filing for BK protection (and refuse to pay for a title report to guarantee marketable title to real property they want to unload on some poor sucker?) should be another waving red flag to their prospective buyer who knew about their intention but was “not privy” to the details.
-
AuthorPosts
