Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
aldante
ParticipantHELL YES!
ParticipantHELL YES!
ParticipantBrian
S&P can downgrade us anytime. They are their own company. Your arguement all along has been so annoying.
*******If the country was not in such a terrible situation it never would have been faced with a downgrade. ********
If the market did not have at least some recognition that S&P has some reason for the downgrade the market would not have reacted.
Now do you want to blame the “market”?ParticipantBrian
S&P can downgrade us anytime. They are their own company. Your arguement all along has been so annoying.
*******If the country was not in such a terrible situation it never would have been faced with a downgrade. ********
If the market did not have at least some recognition that S&P has some reason for the downgrade the market would not have reacted.
Now do you want to blame the “market”?ParticipantBrian
S&P can downgrade us anytime. They are their own company. Your arguement all along has been so annoying.
*******If the country was not in such a terrible situation it never would have been faced with a downgrade. ********
If the market did not have at least some recognition that S&P has some reason for the downgrade the market would not have reacted.
Now do you want to blame the “market”?ParticipantBrian
S&P can downgrade us anytime. They are their own company. Your arguement all along has been so annoying.
*******If the country was not in such a terrible situation it never would have been faced with a downgrade. ********
If the market did not have at least some recognition that S&P has some reason for the downgrade the market would not have reacted.
Now do you want to blame the “market”?ParticipantBrian
S&P can downgrade us anytime. They are their own company. Your arguement all along has been so annoying.
*******If the country was not in such a terrible situation it never would have been faced with a downgrade. ********
If the market did not have at least some recognition that S&P has some reason for the downgrade the market would not have reacted.
Now do you want to blame the “market”?ParticipantSorry Brian! I am not buying the : “Things would have been so much worse if we did not do the bailout” argument. As far as can see that side tried to convince us that unemployment would be below 8% and it never happened. Why were they wrong? What is their process? What is their logic?
Nope dude your side has not data to support that argument that can be verified. What prediction did they make that you can actually point to as being correct that has had any lasting effect?
Nope. The debt must be paid. By keeping the money supply cheap and plentiful ie. interest rates and federal reserve lending – malinvestment has taken place. The type of investment that does not produce. The type like buying stocks, or commodities that are liquid or can be sold.
I think that if you take a page for the depression of 1920 you see that when the government gets smaller real investment takes place at the proper price point. We have not had that happen. All the POTUS did was put off the inevitable.ParticipantSorry Brian! I am not buying the : “Things would have been so much worse if we did not do the bailout” argument. As far as can see that side tried to convince us that unemployment would be below 8% and it never happened. Why were they wrong? What is their process? What is their logic?
Nope dude your side has not data to support that argument that can be verified. What prediction did they make that you can actually point to as being correct that has had any lasting effect?
Nope. The debt must be paid. By keeping the money supply cheap and plentiful ie. interest rates and federal reserve lending – malinvestment has taken place. The type of investment that does not produce. The type like buying stocks, or commodities that are liquid or can be sold.
I think that if you take a page for the depression of 1920 you see that when the government gets smaller real investment takes place at the proper price point. We have not had that happen. All the POTUS did was put off the inevitable.ParticipantSorry Brian! I am not buying the : “Things would have been so much worse if we did not do the bailout” argument. As far as can see that side tried to convince us that unemployment would be below 8% and it never happened. Why were they wrong? What is their process? What is their logic?
Nope dude your side has not data to support that argument that can be verified. What prediction did they make that you can actually point to as being correct that has had any lasting effect?
Nope. The debt must be paid. By keeping the money supply cheap and plentiful ie. interest rates and federal reserve lending – malinvestment has taken place. The type of investment that does not produce. The type like buying stocks, or commodities that are liquid or can be sold.
I think that if you take a page for the depression of 1920 you see that when the government gets smaller real investment takes place at the proper price point. We have not had that happen. All the POTUS did was put off the inevitable.ParticipantSorry Brian! I am not buying the : “Things would have been so much worse if we did not do the bailout” argument. As far as can see that side tried to convince us that unemployment would be below 8% and it never happened. Why were they wrong? What is their process? What is their logic?
Nope dude your side has not data to support that argument that can be verified. What prediction did they make that you can actually point to as being correct that has had any lasting effect?
Nope. The debt must be paid. By keeping the money supply cheap and plentiful ie. interest rates and federal reserve lending – malinvestment has taken place. The type of investment that does not produce. The type like buying stocks, or commodities that are liquid or can be sold.
I think that if you take a page for the depression of 1920 you see that when the government gets smaller real investment takes place at the proper price point. We have not had that happen. All the POTUS did was put off the inevitable.ParticipantSorry Brian! I am not buying the : “Things would have been so much worse if we did not do the bailout” argument. As far as can see that side tried to convince us that unemployment would be below 8% and it never happened. Why were they wrong? What is their process? What is their logic?
Nope dude your side has not data to support that argument that can be verified. What prediction did they make that you can actually point to as being correct that has had any lasting effect?
Nope. The debt must be paid. By keeping the money supply cheap and plentiful ie. interest rates and federal reserve lending – malinvestment has taken place. The type of investment that does not produce. The type like buying stocks, or commodities that are liquid or can be sold.
I think that if you take a page for the depression of 1920 you see that when the government gets smaller real investment takes place at the proper price point. We have not had that happen. All the POTUS did was put off the inevitable.ParticipantThe house recorded on Friday I had the locks changed yesterday and spent all of today moving. Tonight is the first night in the new place. Btw sellers paid for all of the needed home repair without any negotiation. It was about 11k. I really thank all of you and your observations. It has made me realize that in the end we all have to live somewhere.
ParticipantThe house recorded on Friday I had the locks changed yesterday and spent all of today moving. Tonight is the first night in the new place. Btw sellers paid for all of the needed home repair without any negotiation. It was about 11k. I really thank all of you and your observations. It has made me realize that in the end we all have to live somewhere.
-
AuthorPosts