Menu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,056 through 2,070 (of 2,475 total)
1 2 3 … 137 138 139 … 163 164 165
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 2, 2009 at 10:39 AM in reply to: Lockbox or Appointment Only #340430
    AK
    Participant

    I understand why you might not want a lockbox … heck, I wouldn’t want people like me tromping through my own home 🙂

    If your house is in a very active area / price point, and the listing agent isn’t too busy, I wonder if the weekend open house thing would work for you.

    If not … see if you can get one of those electronic lockbox thingies. Like this:

    http://www.sentrilock.com/products.php

    February 1, 2009 at 10:44 PM in reply to: 4% mortage Rate #339767
    AK
    Participant

    It would be very nice indeed, at least for those who aren’t underwater and have a reasonable chance of refinancing.

    I wouldn’t mind buying at 4% myself.

    I’m just not sure where they’ll find investors willing to lend long at 4% secured by U.S. residential property. Unless, of course, those investors are us taxpayers … and I’m not sure they can squeeze that kind of money out of us.

    February 1, 2009 at 10:44 PM in reply to: 4% mortage Rate #340093
    AK
    Participant

    It would be very nice indeed, at least for those who aren’t underwater and have a reasonable chance of refinancing.

    I wouldn’t mind buying at 4% myself.

    I’m just not sure where they’ll find investors willing to lend long at 4% secured by U.S. residential property. Unless, of course, those investors are us taxpayers … and I’m not sure they can squeeze that kind of money out of us.

    February 1, 2009 at 10:44 PM in reply to: 4% mortage Rate #340189
    AK
    Participant

    It would be very nice indeed, at least for those who aren’t underwater and have a reasonable chance of refinancing.

    I wouldn’t mind buying at 4% myself.

    I’m just not sure where they’ll find investors willing to lend long at 4% secured by U.S. residential property. Unless, of course, those investors are us taxpayers … and I’m not sure they can squeeze that kind of money out of us.

    February 1, 2009 at 10:44 PM in reply to: 4% mortage Rate #340216
    AK
    Participant

    It would be very nice indeed, at least for those who aren’t underwater and have a reasonable chance of refinancing.

    I wouldn’t mind buying at 4% myself.

    I’m just not sure where they’ll find investors willing to lend long at 4% secured by U.S. residential property. Unless, of course, those investors are us taxpayers … and I’m not sure they can squeeze that kind of money out of us.

    February 1, 2009 at 10:44 PM in reply to: 4% mortage Rate #340310
    AK
    Participant

    It would be very nice indeed, at least for those who aren’t underwater and have a reasonable chance of refinancing.

    I wouldn’t mind buying at 4% myself.

    I’m just not sure where they’ll find investors willing to lend long at 4% secured by U.S. residential property. Unless, of course, those investors are us taxpayers … and I’m not sure they can squeeze that kind of money out of us.

    January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM in reply to: Delusional? You wanna see delusional???? #339512
    AK
    Participant

    I’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.

    January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM in reply to: Delusional? You wanna see delusional???? #339838
    AK
    Participant

    I’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.

    January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM in reply to: Delusional? You wanna see delusional???? #339934
    AK
    Participant

    I’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.

    January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM in reply to: Delusional? You wanna see delusional???? #339961
    AK
    Participant

    I’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.

    January 31, 2009 at 8:19 PM in reply to: Delusional? You wanna see delusional???? #340055
    AK
    Participant

    I’m surprised even 20% of lease-to-own deals ever go through.

    January 30, 2009 at 10:24 PM in reply to: WSJ lets Ramsey sneak in an op-ed #339126
    AK
    Participant

    The media should interview those who had been foreclosed upon. Do they feel sorry or relieved? Are they rebuilding their credit, not to mention their lives? Do they miss the pressure of having to make payments they cannot afford on a McMansion that belongs to the lender?

    Definitely something we need to see more of. Thank you, Ramsey.

    January 30, 2009 at 10:24 PM in reply to: WSJ lets Ramsey sneak in an op-ed #339454
    AK
    Participant

    The media should interview those who had been foreclosed upon. Do they feel sorry or relieved? Are they rebuilding their credit, not to mention their lives? Do they miss the pressure of having to make payments they cannot afford on a McMansion that belongs to the lender?

    Definitely something we need to see more of. Thank you, Ramsey.

    January 30, 2009 at 10:24 PM in reply to: WSJ lets Ramsey sneak in an op-ed #339548
    AK
    Participant

    The media should interview those who had been foreclosed upon. Do they feel sorry or relieved? Are they rebuilding their credit, not to mention their lives? Do they miss the pressure of having to make payments they cannot afford on a McMansion that belongs to the lender?

    Definitely something we need to see more of. Thank you, Ramsey.

    January 30, 2009 at 10:24 PM in reply to: WSJ lets Ramsey sneak in an op-ed #339576
    AK
    Participant

    The media should interview those who had been foreclosed upon. Do they feel sorry or relieved? Are they rebuilding their credit, not to mention their lives? Do they miss the pressure of having to make payments they cannot afford on a McMansion that belongs to the lender?

    Definitely something we need to see more of. Thank you, Ramsey.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 2,056 through 2,070 (of 2,475 total)
1 2 3 … 137 138 139 … 163 164 165