- This topic has 155 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by
Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 1, 2009 at 10:59 PM #340315February 2, 2009 at 9:27 AM #339852
HLS
ParticipantHOLY CRAP,, what a great idea!
While they are at it, they can go to AA meetings and pass out 2 for 1 coupons for alcohol,
Go to drug rehab houses and pass out free drugs, and go to Weight Watcher & Jenny Craig meetings and give out discount coupons for Fried Chicken, Ice Cream, Pizza and Pies and stand at the door of casinos handing out gift cards to cover their losses..
May as well give beer & wine to homeless people too, so they can drown their sorrows.This $#!(*^&% government is DELUSIONAL about believing that they can fix this problem by spending money that doesn’t exist.
Give people whatever they want because it’s good for the economy ????
The answer is changing foreclosure law to 60 days instead of 6 months +. GET PEOPLE OUT that cannot afford whatever they agreed to.
The house wont get burnt down, and it wont sit empty very long if they grow up and are willing to sell it for “what it’s worth”..
Someone who can actually afford it will buy it, instead of saving a gambler who made a bad bet..
This is worse than any episode of the TWILIGHT ZONE, and is scarier than any horror movie I have ever seen…..HLS
February 2, 2009 at 9:27 AM #340178ParticipantHOLY CRAP,, what a great idea!
While they are at it, they can go to AA meetings and pass out 2 for 1 coupons for alcohol,
Go to drug rehab houses and pass out free drugs, and go to Weight Watcher & Jenny Craig meetings and give out discount coupons for Fried Chicken, Ice Cream, Pizza and Pies and stand at the door of casinos handing out gift cards to cover their losses..
May as well give beer & wine to homeless people too, so they can drown their sorrows.This $#!(*^&% government is DELUSIONAL about believing that they can fix this problem by spending money that doesn’t exist.
Give people whatever they want because it’s good for the economy ????
The answer is changing foreclosure law to 60 days instead of 6 months +. GET PEOPLE OUT that cannot afford whatever they agreed to.
The house wont get burnt down, and it wont sit empty very long if they grow up and are willing to sell it for “what it’s worth”..
Someone who can actually afford it will buy it, instead of saving a gambler who made a bad bet..
This is worse than any episode of the TWILIGHT ZONE, and is scarier than any horror movie I have ever seen…..HLS
February 2, 2009 at 9:27 AM #340275ParticipantHOLY CRAP,, what a great idea!
While they are at it, they can go to AA meetings and pass out 2 for 1 coupons for alcohol,
Go to drug rehab houses and pass out free drugs, and go to Weight Watcher & Jenny Craig meetings and give out discount coupons for Fried Chicken, Ice Cream, Pizza and Pies and stand at the door of casinos handing out gift cards to cover their losses..
May as well give beer & wine to homeless people too, so they can drown their sorrows.This $#!(*^&% government is DELUSIONAL about believing that they can fix this problem by spending money that doesn’t exist.
Give people whatever they want because it’s good for the economy ????
The answer is changing foreclosure law to 60 days instead of 6 months +. GET PEOPLE OUT that cannot afford whatever they agreed to.
The house wont get burnt down, and it wont sit empty very long if they grow up and are willing to sell it for “what it’s worth”..
Someone who can actually afford it will buy it, instead of saving a gambler who made a bad bet..
This is worse than any episode of the TWILIGHT ZONE, and is scarier than any horror movie I have ever seen…..HLS
February 2, 2009 at 9:27 AM #340301ParticipantHOLY CRAP,, what a great idea!
While they are at it, they can go to AA meetings and pass out 2 for 1 coupons for alcohol,
Go to drug rehab houses and pass out free drugs, and go to Weight Watcher & Jenny Craig meetings and give out discount coupons for Fried Chicken, Ice Cream, Pizza and Pies and stand at the door of casinos handing out gift cards to cover their losses..
May as well give beer & wine to homeless people too, so they can drown their sorrows.This $#!(*^&% government is DELUSIONAL about believing that they can fix this problem by spending money that doesn’t exist.
Give people whatever they want because it’s good for the economy ????
The answer is changing foreclosure law to 60 days instead of 6 months +. GET PEOPLE OUT that cannot afford whatever they agreed to.
The house wont get burnt down, and it wont sit empty very long if they grow up and are willing to sell it for “what it’s worth”..
Someone who can actually afford it will buy it, instead of saving a gambler who made a bad bet..
This is worse than any episode of the TWILIGHT ZONE, and is scarier than any horror movie I have ever seen…..HLS
February 2, 2009 at 9:27 AM #340395ParticipantHOLY CRAP,, what a great idea!
While they are at it, they can go to AA meetings and pass out 2 for 1 coupons for alcohol,
Go to drug rehab houses and pass out free drugs, and go to Weight Watcher & Jenny Craig meetings and give out discount coupons for Fried Chicken, Ice Cream, Pizza and Pies and stand at the door of casinos handing out gift cards to cover their losses..
May as well give beer & wine to homeless people too, so they can drown their sorrows.This $#!(*^&% government is DELUSIONAL about believing that they can fix this problem by spending money that doesn’t exist.
Give people whatever they want because it’s good for the economy ????
The answer is changing foreclosure law to 60 days instead of 6 months +. GET PEOPLE OUT that cannot afford whatever they agreed to.
The house wont get burnt down, and it wont sit empty very long if they grow up and are willing to sell it for “what it’s worth”..
Someone who can actually afford it will buy it, instead of saving a gambler who made a bad bet..
This is worse than any episode of the TWILIGHT ZONE, and is scarier than any horror movie I have ever seen…..HLS
February 2, 2009 at 10:07 AM #339862cr
ParticipantWell – and colorfully – said HLS.
Another thing the gov’t fails to even recognize much less acknowledge and act according to is that a lot of people upside down don’t want to refi and stay in a home that won’t make them rich like they thought when they bought.
Some might say the gov’t would rather have “owners” paying whatever they can, but that will only lead to more losses at banks, less lending, more bailouts, and so on down the vicious cycle of government problem “solving”.
Cold turkey would have been best 3 years ago. Just imagine in Bernanke had come in and said rates are too low, prices are too high, and the economy can handle a rate hike right now.
It’s hard to imagine that being any worse than what we’re seeing now.
February 2, 2009 at 10:07 AM #340188ParticipantWell – and colorfully – said HLS.
Another thing the gov’t fails to even recognize much less acknowledge and act according to is that a lot of people upside down don’t want to refi and stay in a home that won’t make them rich like they thought when they bought.
Some might say the gov’t would rather have “owners” paying whatever they can, but that will only lead to more losses at banks, less lending, more bailouts, and so on down the vicious cycle of government problem “solving”.
Cold turkey would have been best 3 years ago. Just imagine in Bernanke had come in and said rates are too low, prices are too high, and the economy can handle a rate hike right now.
It’s hard to imagine that being any worse than what we’re seeing now.
February 2, 2009 at 10:07 AM #340284ParticipantWell – and colorfully – said HLS.
Another thing the gov’t fails to even recognize much less acknowledge and act according to is that a lot of people upside down don’t want to refi and stay in a home that won’t make them rich like they thought when they bought.
Some might say the gov’t would rather have “owners” paying whatever they can, but that will only lead to more losses at banks, less lending, more bailouts, and so on down the vicious cycle of government problem “solving”.
Cold turkey would have been best 3 years ago. Just imagine in Bernanke had come in and said rates are too low, prices are too high, and the economy can handle a rate hike right now.
It’s hard to imagine that being any worse than what we’re seeing now.
February 2, 2009 at 10:07 AM #340311ParticipantWell – and colorfully – said HLS.
Another thing the gov’t fails to even recognize much less acknowledge and act according to is that a lot of people upside down don’t want to refi and stay in a home that won’t make them rich like they thought when they bought.
Some might say the gov’t would rather have “owners” paying whatever they can, but that will only lead to more losses at banks, less lending, more bailouts, and so on down the vicious cycle of government problem “solving”.
Cold turkey would have been best 3 years ago. Just imagine in Bernanke had come in and said rates are too low, prices are too high, and the economy can handle a rate hike right now.
It’s hard to imagine that being any worse than what we’re seeing now.
February 2, 2009 at 10:07 AM #340405ParticipantWell – and colorfully – said HLS.
Another thing the gov’t fails to even recognize much less acknowledge and act according to is that a lot of people upside down don’t want to refi and stay in a home that won’t make them rich like they thought when they bought.
Some might say the gov’t would rather have “owners” paying whatever they can, but that will only lead to more losses at banks, less lending, more bailouts, and so on down the vicious cycle of government problem “solving”.
Cold turkey would have been best 3 years ago. Just imagine in Bernanke had come in and said rates are too low, prices are too high, and the economy can handle a rate hike right now.
It’s hard to imagine that being any worse than what we’re seeing now.
February 2, 2009 at 11:42 AM #339922patientlywaiting
Participant[quote=SD Realtor]
The problem is your presuming we actually have a say in what our tax dollars, our childrens tax dollars, and our grandchildrens tax dollars are spent on. Clearly they are not. In fact the first failed bailout was a joke and this recent bailout is not much more then a spending spree by our government. Explain to me how over 300 million in std prevention is a bailout?
The bottom line is this will all be backstopped by the government.
It doesn’t matter if our leaders are democrats or republicans.
[/quote]
SD Realtor, we need to differentiate between bailout, stimulus and spending.
I’m for letting the market self-correct.
But how is a bailout of the irresponsible better then spending to help the people who were left out during the prosperous years?
Isn’t stimulus all about getting the money flowing in the economy?
February 2, 2009 at 11:42 AM #340247Participant[quote=SD Realtor]
The problem is your presuming we actually have a say in what our tax dollars, our childrens tax dollars, and our grandchildrens tax dollars are spent on. Clearly they are not. In fact the first failed bailout was a joke and this recent bailout is not much more then a spending spree by our government. Explain to me how over 300 million in std prevention is a bailout?
The bottom line is this will all be backstopped by the government.
It doesn’t matter if our leaders are democrats or republicans.
[/quote]
SD Realtor, we need to differentiate between bailout, stimulus and spending.
I’m for letting the market self-correct.
But how is a bailout of the irresponsible better then spending to help the people who were left out during the prosperous years?
Isn’t stimulus all about getting the money flowing in the economy?
February 2, 2009 at 11:42 AM #340344Participant[quote=SD Realtor]
The problem is your presuming we actually have a say in what our tax dollars, our childrens tax dollars, and our grandchildrens tax dollars are spent on. Clearly they are not. In fact the first failed bailout was a joke and this recent bailout is not much more then a spending spree by our government. Explain to me how over 300 million in std prevention is a bailout?
The bottom line is this will all be backstopped by the government.
It doesn’t matter if our leaders are democrats or republicans.
[/quote]
SD Realtor, we need to differentiate between bailout, stimulus and spending.
I’m for letting the market self-correct.
But how is a bailout of the irresponsible better then spending to help the people who were left out during the prosperous years?
Isn’t stimulus all about getting the money flowing in the economy?
February 2, 2009 at 11:42 AM #340371Participant[quote=SD Realtor]
The problem is your presuming we actually have a say in what our tax dollars, our childrens tax dollars, and our grandchildrens tax dollars are spent on. Clearly they are not. In fact the first failed bailout was a joke and this recent bailout is not much more then a spending spree by our government. Explain to me how over 300 million in std prevention is a bailout?
The bottom line is this will all be backstopped by the government.
It doesn’t matter if our leaders are democrats or republicans.
[/quote]
SD Realtor, we need to differentiate between bailout, stimulus and spending.
I’m for letting the market self-correct.
But how is a bailout of the irresponsible better then spending to help the people who were left out during the prosperous years?
Isn’t stimulus all about getting the money flowing in the economy?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.