Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 20, 2010 at 8:09 AM in reply to: OT: Chase sucks………………….fees fees fees fees fees fees #607360September 20, 2010 at 8:09 AM in reply to: OT: Chase sucks………………….fees fees fees fees fees fees #607468
afx114
Participant[quote=KSMountain] Does that mean Ben Bridge and Jessup’s should be forced to give some or all of us free watch cleaning and repair, because they “make enough”?
Should we reduce their profits? Should we be able to say what they can charge, or be able to limit their markup, so that the “most vulnerable among us” aren’t victimized? [BTW, I’m one of them].[/quote]
That depends. Did the jewelry store get a 0% loan from the taxpayers to purchase their inventory and pay their payroll, lease, and insurance?
September 20, 2010 at 8:09 AM in reply to: OT: Chase sucks………………….fees fees fees fees fees fees #607786afx114
Participant[quote=KSMountain] Does that mean Ben Bridge and Jessup’s should be forced to give some or all of us free watch cleaning and repair, because they “make enough”?
Should we reduce their profits? Should we be able to say what they can charge, or be able to limit their markup, so that the “most vulnerable among us” aren’t victimized? [BTW, I’m one of them].[/quote]
That depends. Did the jewelry store get a 0% loan from the taxpayers to purchase their inventory and pay their payroll, lease, and insurance?
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]a huge area of Hoovervilles surrounding the major cities.[/quote]
But what would we call them? Cartereaganushtonushbamavilles?
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]a huge area of Hoovervilles surrounding the major cities.[/quote]
But what would we call them? Cartereaganushtonushbamavilles?
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]a huge area of Hoovervilles surrounding the major cities.[/quote]
But what would we call them? Cartereaganushtonushbamavilles?
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]a huge area of Hoovervilles surrounding the major cities.[/quote]
But what would we call them? Cartereaganushtonushbamavilles?
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]a huge area of Hoovervilles surrounding the major cities.[/quote]
But what would we call them? Cartereaganushtonushbamavilles?
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
afx114
Participant[quote=Aecetia]Obama is doing great, just look at his standings in the polls. “Number of Americans in poverty jumps to 43.6M; working-age poor at highest level since 1960s.” He is right up there with LBJ and Hoover.
Gallup has an interactive graph that lets you compare presidential approval ratings. Here is how the presidents have ranked at roughly 600 days into office:
76 G Bush
70 G W Bush
66 Eisenhower
65 Johnson
63 Kennedy
57 Nixon
48 Ford
46 Obama
45 Carter
42 Clinton
42 Regan
35 TrumanApproval @ 600 days averages around 54%.
These are intersting numbers, but when you compare them to how the various administrations eventually panned out, they don’t reveal much. Polls schmolls.
afx114
Participant[quote=JC]3521 Mississippi, 92104 has been on the market for a long time and for good reason(s).[/quote]
Care to elaborate?
afx114
Participant[quote=JC]3521 Mississippi, 92104 has been on the market for a long time and for good reason(s).[/quote]
Care to elaborate?
-
AuthorPosts
